A common observation is that Sony sucks at marketing their games and that's because they don't have enough money to do so. Why? Because they pay off reviewers left, right and center to get good scores for their games.
Legend11 correctly predicted that GTA IV (360+PS3) would outsell SSBB. I was wrong.
Biased reviews are a pleasure to read. Just my opinion, of course.
You'd think that I'd be flattered that you copied my thread, but I'm not. Your copying is annoying as fuck. STOP SAYING LULZ. STOP SAYING INDUBITABLY. STOP COPYING MY THREADS.
What are you talking about? I did not copy your thread. I haven't even read your thread (did I comment there? Don't think so)... Lulz
The thing is, a game that was a 95% two years ago may just be an 85% today. Standards change. If Super Mario Bros. 1 released today, it wouldn't be considered one of the greatest games of all time. Killzone was a 91% back when. Halo is an 87%, now. If we could go back in time and release Halo 4 back in 2009 (or whatever), it would dominate. Nothing is immune to time.
Nice original thread OP but i expect MS fan to retaliate with their own thread, comparing forza to metal gear solid or even gt5
No, this is not right.
Only you could come up with a thread like this.
Too many people think like you do.
But I see what this is about.
Any minute now, everyone else will too.
And I agree. Quality=/= sales.