I don't think technology can accomplish what you want. This is a job for medical science.

First, women need to:

1-Live shorter like men.

2-Go bald like men

3-Get male-only or mostly-men diseases/affections, from testicular cancer to color blindness.

4-Suffer an unfair judicial system like men. (When divorced, house, child and pension go to woman, men condemned to misery).

5-Suffer sexist "anti-sexism" comments and general disdain like men.

6-Suffer a female companion like (straight) men, and having to know exactly what's going on in her mind and meet impossible demands.

7-Suffer existing sexism toward men like equating working 40h+/w to doing home chores, having to be responsible for bringing money, dealing with paperwork, dealing with "manly" chores like piping and technology and more stupid stuff like that. Not always, but in some cases.

8-Only being able to have one orgasm per "session".

9-Suffer threads like this.

And I'm sure other things I'm missing.

Society puts more pressure on men than women, that's why 90% of suicides are from men. The fact that we have to protect women like they're delicate flowers at the expense of equal rights is what I consider sexism.

please tell me how a man would give birth, to me it's just sounds impossible, wrong and unnatural. If a man wanted to give birth, they can have a sex change can't they? ain't that enough?

I believe there is a REASON why women and untimately all female animals give birth rather than male, i don't know why but i believe that's how nature intended it and we humans should not being messing around with natural things like birth.

and How would giving a man the ability to give birth somehow completely remove sexism, i don't understand.

Also, technology has gone quite far to improve our lifes but stuff like this shouldn't be made possible. This is almost like making women get pregnant without having sex without a man, it's just plain wrong i think.

The only way i see racism or sexism going away is if people got to know each other better and become more tolerant themselves, you can't just force change like that

Males are designed to fertilize and then leave, possible to fertilize more. That happens a large majority of the time in nature. It's instinct, an uncontrollable desire. The wild animals can't help it, they might not be able to form thoughts, but they always know how to reproduce.

If you think asexualism is the way to go (I think that's what you think), then you must understand, that two different pairs of DNA are required to make a new creature. Man DNA + Woman DNA = new offspring. If you create offspring using the same pair of DNA, then there is no biodiversity. Biodiversity and reproduction between male and female is what creates evolution. Two different immune systems have a larger potential to create healthy offspring than similar immune systems (relatives). Scent and smell is very important in the science of attraction. People with similar immune systems (which is defined by DNA) will not find each other attractive by their scent, because they have similar immune systems. This is a built in mechanism to try to prevent incest.
Maybe that didn't really have anything to do with the topic, but oh well.

If the male carries the egg using his DNA, then who fertilizes the egg? Another man, a woman?? I don't really think either of those options would work

Actually, I'm pretty sure that it's possible (at least in theory) for a woman to make another woman pregnant. Both me and my younger sister (who also get more recent scientific updates...) have heard our teachers say that.

But yeah, a man getting pregnant is still out of this world.

Not to rain on your he-man / women-hater parade (which I'd happily march in any day of the week lol), but didn't a guy invent the Wonderbra?

No, a Canadian did. Are you suggesting that the Wonderbra hasn't benefitted menfolk, though? Sure, it can be deceptive, but it also enables us to ogle otherwise unogleable titties. I'm going to say it's a qualified win for guys.