ok wanted to post but andrespetmonkey already said what i wanted to say with other species. it can't be "coincidence" that almost every species has some gay. i already explained in another thread that some biologists believe there is a reason for that and that relatives of gay people are more fertile. so that means if a gay guy has a sister, she is more fertile than a woman without gay in the family. no clue how this works but i believe that and it should have a reason why nature works like that.
and even if it would be an "error" and not "normal", it would be still not wrong, why should it be wrong? is it wrong that some straight people don't want kids? nowadays it is very good that we have some of them even if i am not one of them but some might think this is also wrong because a man has a penis and a woman has a vagina to make babies...is it wrong if people use a plain to fly? humans didn't get wings as part of their body, that has to mean humans shouldn't fly! (yeah bad example but still some truth in it haha)
so when i see the poll and see that i voted no as a straight and some gay should have voted no as well, seems like most straight voted with yes...