No, I see it as an exercise of bashing every awesome looking game that is not in people´s console of choice, not just the PS3.

God of War: GOW

Gears of War:  GeOW (or something like that, but different than the previous acronym)

God of War was released first so the "GOW" acronym is used for that franchise.   Gears of War came later so it needs another acronym.

Cant come up with any "bad games".

I generally am not fond of Crysis 1 & 2, but it's still a good game in all fairness.

The thread topic was just asking for it. I secretly think that is why it was created :x

Honestly? There aren't any.

There are quite a few forgettable games with great graphics (like Crysis), but when you're pouring enough money into the game that it looks that good, you will probably have spent a fair bit on the gameplay as well, so it won't be broken or anything.

No this is quite a good  sign, this thread shows really good  that most gamers  actually aren't really like this grafik rail Shooter like Uncharted. The Gaming press and the developer want make us believe that everyone love this games but that is obviously not true. The developer only want make us believe that this games are so great because this games are not that difficult to develop, they need no innovation, no new ideas, no risk. For a game like Uncharted, they don't have to create really good levels with good leveldesign because this games are linear like rail Shooters, and the gameplay in Uncharted is made for casual players. All they have to get right in a game like Uncharted are the graphics.  

It is really time that the gamers show there real opinion  and show the developers that they cant fool us, we gamers don't want 1000 of this boring crap games only because it is a save way to making money, the developers should get up thair asses and stop making that many of this graphic shit games and give us creative, innovativ new games with cool settings, good storys, creative gameplay and they should not concentrate that much on graphics.

Games like Uncharted are the reason why gaming is nowadays way more borig  than it was former in the 90s.

Modern Warfare 3.

oh how could I forget, the new Medal of Honor, great graphics, shit game

 Games like Uncharted need nothing new, they don't need creative people to make a game like this and it is without a doubt way easiere to finde staff who can develope nice graphics than to finde a really good, creative creative-director  and it is way more risky to try to make  creative  games. There are many developers out there who are able to develop an uncharted or a call of duty but how many developers nowadays are out there who are able to made a shenmue, a Portal or a Shadow of the Colossus?

I think there could be way more crative developers out there because the crative people are not died out, but as long as gamers buy always this boring graphic games and made it that easie for developers to earn money as long we only get Call of duty 1 till 100 and Uncharted 1 till 100.

Gamers have to show the developers and the press that we want more then boring graphic games and casual wii fit shit.

And yet everybody keeps talking about Crysis. Maybe it is not that forgetable.