By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Nintendo is the only one in the room displaying leadership and innovation.

Innovation is NOT R&D.  It doesn't consist of having the largest research budget and betting on everything.  It isn't either that you do what is out there currently, "bigger, badder, and better".  What it consists of is beating others to the market with new changes and features that others aren't coming up with that others, and masses on forums will end up mocking and saying is stupid.  You then win by this.

The room I speak of is this website, and videogame industry, consisting of console makers.  Of the tree, Nintendo is the only one displaying leadership and innovation.  One can argue Apple has been up there, but this is not the room I am referring to. 

You may doubt me, but answer me this: Exactly WHAT are Microsoft and Sony bringing to the table now that is new, and different that changes the game the way Nintendo has been doing since the Wii?  Microsoft brought Achievements.  Sony brought what, Home?  Fact is Nintendo is actually not caring what rabble on forums think, nor the media coverage of things.  They are doing stuff new.  It is not the same old.

And this goes as far as how they talk about things.  You actually see thought going into what they are doing that is NEW, to address problems seen that aren't currently addressed.  In this, people will then talk about, "But, but... Microsoft's talk about Natal show intellectual understanding of things, that counts, right?"  Does it?  What I heard from Microsoft regarding Natal was what Nintendo said years earlier.  They just do it bigger and more extreme.  And Sony?  Take motion control and say "We do it better".  It isn't innovation, it is refinement.  

It is all red ocean thinking here, outside of Nintendo.  It is not innovation or leadership, it is bullying for a set market currently.  Disagree with me, show where exactly Microsoft and Sony are bringing out anything new here, that changes the game, and causes much debate.   All I can see is, "Wow, X won E3 because Y game title".  Game titles are not innovation, they are content.  They don't change how people play.  They can lead to an evolving of the art of entertainment, but they don't fundamentally change how people play.

Ok, I will let others jump in here and show otherwise.  I would be interested in hearing how Sony and Microsoft are doing anything to advance the art.  Only thing you can really knock here is that Microsoft and Sony have not leaked info regarding their next generation systems.  Anyone here care to guess what they will offer different than what is out now, the way Nintendo did with the WiiU, which lead to first to people thinking it was pointless, to now saying SmartGlass does it better?



Around the Network

Sony brought good games



ǝןdɯıs ʇı dǝǝʞ oʇ ǝʞıן ı ʍouʞ noʎ 

Ask me about being an elitist jerk

Time for hype

leatherhat said:
Sony brought good games


So did Nintendo.



Yes.

www.spacemag.org - contribute your stuff... satire, comics, ideas, debate, stupidy stupid etc.

bazmeistergen said:
leatherhat said:
Sony brought good games


So did Nintendo.

Good games are what keep you in the videogame industry.  It is producing stuff that people want and enjoy.  That is neither leadershop nor innovation, but what is needed.  Microsoft also has good games for the XBox also, and more coming.



bazmeistergen said:
leatherhat said:
Sony brought good games


So did Nintendo.


Name 12



ǝןdɯıs ʇı dǝǝʞ oʇ ǝʞıן ı ʍouʞ noʎ 

Ask me about being an elitist jerk

Time for hype

Around the Network
RolStoppable said:
Nintendo showed off the Wii U. That's not leadership and innovation, that's idiocy.

Let's go back to 2005-2006.  The quote was then:

Nintendo showed off the Wii. That's not leadership and innovation, that's idiocy.

Back then, the Wii was forecast to be a failure, mocked, called a gimmick and left for dead.  Now it is the Wii U that is getting that.



This is actually...kinda...already known.



Innovation is not always useful or meaningful.

and I certainly didn't see leadership, but a manufacturer desperately trying to make up for the colossal ground it has lost to the competition.

And yes, they completely lack decisive sofware atm.



richardhutnik said:

It is all red ocean thinking here, outside of Nintendo.

Seriously? "Hey kids, do you want to play with an iPad while sitting on a Wii Fit board while your friends waggle around with Wiimotes and your Xbox loving older bro plays along with a controller that will make him feel right at home?" That doesn't sound like red ocean thinking to you? The Wii was about making gaming simpler and more accessible. The Wii U's philosophy is just "more cowbell".

It's very telling that you didn't even try and make a case for Nintendo. All you did is run down Sony and Microsoft. Just because they stink doesn't mean Nintendon't.

I leave you with this:



leatherhat said:
bazmeistergen said:
leatherhat said:
Sony brought good games


So did Nintendo.


Name 12


Do they have to be made by Nintendo, can we include 3rd parties, and are we only talking about the Wii U?



Love and tolerate.