By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo Discussion - Nintendo Wii U supports 1080p, CPU and GPU confirmed - UPDATE: Spec sheet! 1.5 GB RAM, 3 core PowerPC CPU etc. Thread now includes FREE Icelandic lessons!

Andrespetmonkey said:
lilbroex said:
Andrespetmonkey said:
Durango and Orbis may have six-core cpus and and for sure will have at least 3gb on RAM. Crazy to think they may have double the cores and will have double the RAM.


Crazy? Not in the slightest. It will just make dev cost 3-4 times higher. Is that all that you came to this thread to say though?

I think it's a pretty crazy statistic.

It will not make dev costs 3-4 times higher lol double at most. And several things happening next gen will cut costs in other areas, but that's off topic.

@bolded Clearly not as I've made several other posts throughout this thread.

What's your problem? You don't have to be so hostile.

Hmm...I can see you understand very little about technical specs and working with hardware.



Around the Network

lilbroex said:

Now that more like it and YES!!!!! They added the Tesselation unit. That automatically make it superior to any console to date.

X360 already have a tessalation unit... Halo Reach, Crisis 3, etc  uses it.



TadpoleJackson said:
ethomaz said:
forest-spirit said:

I want Smash Bros. to support six players!

Two Wii U's pad controllers causes fps drop .


30FPS is pretty standard... Only one PS3 game runs at 60FPS in multiplayer that I can think of. A few more for the 360. I really don't see the problem here :3

For this gen? No problem...
For next gen? That's a big problem...



While not the most impressive specs, and they may run into the same Wii problems if 3'rd party abandons them, the 32mb eDRAM and Tesselation support are good though.

No standard 60GB (At least) harddrive is a mistake though.



lilbroex said:
Hmm...I can see you understand very little about technical specs and working with hardware.

If you say so.

Again, why so hostile? 

What was your problem with the first post you replied to? Which dev costs had absolutely nothing to do with by the way.



Around the Network
Andrespetmonkey said:
lilbroex said:
Hmm...I can see you understand very little about technical specs and working with hardware.

If you say so.

Again, why so hostile? 

What was your problem with the first post you replied to? Which dev costs had absolutely nothing to do with by the way.


Hostile? In what way?

 



lilbroex said:
Andrespetmonkey said:
lilbroex said:
Hmm...I can see you understand very little about technical specs and working with hardware.

If you say so.

Again, why so hostile? 

What was your problem with the first post you replied to? Which dev costs had absolutely nothing to do with by the way.


Hostile? In what way?

Sensed hostility in "Is that all that you came to this thread to say though?" and "I can see you understand very little about technical specs and working with hardware."

Not to mention these replies have nothing of worth in them. So what was your problem with the first post you replied to?



lilbroex said:
Andrespetmonkey said:
lilbroex said:
Hmm...I can see you understand very little about technical specs and working with hardware.

If you say so.

Again, why so hostile? 

What was your problem with the first post you replied to? Which dev costs had absolutely nothing to do with by the way.


Hostile? In what way?

I was just curious as to what your intentions were. It seemed like a typical doomsayer here to defend there more preferred companies console type of post. Nothing knew on to me. Just varifying whether or not you had any progressive intent.

It was just a thought, an observation. Definitely not a "typical doomsayer type of post," I'm not defending any company and I have no idea where you got that idea from.



Millenium said:
While not the most impressive specs, and they may run into the same Wii problems if 3'rd party abandons them, the 32mb eDRAM and Tesselation support are good though.

No standard 60GB (At least) harddrive is a mistake though.

To be honest an internal drive doesn't seem like a necessity. Almost anyone has an external HDD drive at home, and if not a new one comes for cheap, also you're not forced to buy a proprietary hard dirve (like on 360) or to break the warranty seal (like on Ps3).



Andrespetmonkey said:
lilbroex said:
Andrespetmonkey said:
lilbroex said:
Hmm...I can see you understand very little about technical specs and working with hardware.

If you say so.

Again, why so hostile? 

What was your problem with the first post you replied to? Which dev costs had absolutely nothing to do with by the way.


Hostile? In what way?

Sensed hostility in "Is that all that you came to this thread to say though?" and "I can see you understand very little about technical specs and working with hardware."

Not to mention these replies have nothing of worth in them. So what was your problem with the first post you replied to?

That is called a question. I was just curious as to what your intentions were. It seemed like a typical doomsayer here to defend there more preferred companies console type of post. Nothing knew to me.  Just varifying whether or not you had any progressive intent.

Your comment lacked signs of any comrehension of tech or hardware. Not a single comment about anything specific in the topic post about specs. No logic used. No reasoning. No supporting facts or info. Nothing more than unfounded dreams and asperations of Microsoft and Sony's next console which would more than likely be better discussed in their own sections.

 

I was expecting something a little more unique and creative.

I guess some things will never change.