By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General Discussion - Execution of an innocent man

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-18091903

Texas 'executed an innocent man', report claims

 
Texas has the highest execution rate in the US with 482 prisoners killed since 1976

The US state of Texas is likely to have executed an innocent man due to careless handling of the case, a report by US law students claims.

Carlos de Luna was killed by lethal injection in 1989 for the brutal murder of a single mother six years earlier.

Right up until his execution, de Luna maintained a fellow Hispanic called Carlos Hernandez was the real culprit.

The Columbia University report backs his claim. It says "shoddy police work" probably led to the wrong man dying.

Under the supervision of Professor James Liebman, 12 students spent five years painstakingly dissecting the 1983 murder of Wanda Lopez in the Texan city of Corpus Christi. The petrol station clerk was stabbed in the chest with a lock-blade buck knife.

The students combed through endless police files and crime scene footage, and interviewed more than 100 witnesses, including detectives who had worked on the case.

The result is a 436-page book entitled Los Tocayos Carlos: An Anatomy of a Wrongful Execution, which, according to Professor Liebman, reveals an "emblematic" failure of the legal system.

The same factors that sent de Luna to his death continue to put innocent people at risk of execution today”

Professor James Liebman Columbia University

"It looked like a common case, but we found that there was a very serious claim of innocence," said Prof Liebman.

The study details how 40 minutes after Lopez's murder, officers found de Luna hiding underneath a pick-up truck near the crime scene and arrested him.

He was charged with capital murder despite contradictory eyewitness accounts - the killer was seen fleeing towards the north, while de Luna was caught in the east - and the absence of blood on his clothing.

The law students also found that police had failed to test the murder weapon and victim's nails for blood and tissue samples.

Most importantly, investigators ignored de Luna's insistence that the real perpetrator was another Hispanic man known as Carlos Hernandez.

"I didn't do it, but I know who did," de Luna is quoted in the study as repeatedly saying, adding that he saw Hernandez entering the service station.

'Spitting image'

At the trial, the prosecution dismissed Hernandez as a "phantom" of the defendant's imagination. The Columbia study, however, confirms Hernandez was a well-known dangerous criminal.

Grim statistics

  • There have been 1,295 executions in the US since the Supreme Court reinstated capital punishment in 1976
  • So far 482 prisoners have been killed in Texas, making it the state with highest execution rate

"Carlos Hernandez was always involved in violent crimes, and his weapon of choice was the knife," retired Corpus Christi detective Eddie Garza said in a video testimonial included in the report.

"My informants told me Hernandez had got someone else to take the fall [for Lopez's murder]. I contacted the detective in charge of the case. He said they had enough evidence linking Carlos de Luna to the crime so I backed away from it."

In essence, de Luna was executed because he looked the "spitting image" of the actual killer and officers handled the case with "nonchalance", said Prof Liebman.

"Everything that could go wrong in a death penalty case did go wrong for de Luna.

"Sadly, his story is not unique. The same factors that sent de Luna to his death - faulty eyewitness testimony, shoddy legal representation, and prosecutorial misfeasance - continue to put innocent people at risk of execution today."

Carlos Hernandez died of natural causes in a Texas prison in May 1999, having been jailed for assaulting a neighbour with a 9in (23cm) knife.

 

 

 

At least when an innocent man is jailed he can be freed, when an innocent man is executed there is no going back.



Around the Network

Imagine being framed and everyone thought you committed a crime and only you knew you were innocent...that would be an absolute nightmare.



Sure, but being stuck in jail for 20+ years getting your butt raped might be worse than death to many.



And that's (part of) why I don't like the death penalty.



And this is why the death penalty is wrong.

I understand that there are criminals that deserve to die, but we are not gods. We have no right to dictate who lives or dies, especially if we arent present at the time of the crime.



Around the Network

its such bullshit... State endorsed murder. Why doesn't the person who handed down the death sentence get tried for manslaughter too? That person killed somebody too right, but there is zero doubt there...



The Truth About Wrongful Conviction
5% to 10% of all people in prison are estimated to be  innocent
DNA is helping a bit nowadays

http://www.innocenceproject.org/Content/Facts_on_PostConviction_DNA_Exonerations.php

It's not all CSI in the real world


Yep DNA evidence is amazing.



Hmm... why am I not surprised it is Texas who has the highest?



forest-spirit said:
And that's (part of) why I don't like the death penalty.


In between the years of waiting for someone to prove your innonence and getting ass raped on a daily basis, sometimes you'd rather just die.



"Trick shot? The trick is NOT to get shot." - Lucian