By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony Discussion - The Official Playstation All-Stars Battle Royale Thread - OP Updated

Acevil said:
enditall727 said:
Acevil said:
Okay seriously, now this is gone for awhile.
Sony fans: Even the website that played the game state the obvious inspiration of the game, it is pretty obvious, sugar coat it all you want.

Nintendo fans: Seriously so what if it is a clone of a beloved franchise, it is different at the same time because it is different cast, and while I might not personally care about Sony characters as much as the next guy, let sony fans have this brawler.


what Sony fan tried to say that Smash Bros WASN'T and inspiration for Battle Royale?


Well trying to justify it that is unique enough, I don't really see distinction to say that it is that different, and I know fans don't want much difference. 

(Also I can't tell some user are joking or not in their post.)

1. All stages are mash-up from 2 different games
2. Variety of characters from Kratos to Sly Cooper
3. Online component that most likely works
4. HD Visuals at 60 FPS
5. No health bar or life limit. The only way to win is to pump out your super moves which are 1-hit KOs.(Biggest Different between the 2 games IMO)
6. Potential for a long life with DLC and game updates.

All this alone makes the game different enough to make even a Smash Bros fan buy the game if they got a PS3.



Around the Network
VGKing said:
Acevil said:
enditall727 said:
Acevil said:
Okay seriously, now this is gone for awhile.
Sony fans: Even the website that played the game state the obvious inspiration of the game, it is pretty obvious, sugar coat it all you want.

Nintendo fans: Seriously so what if it is a clone of a beloved franchise, it is different at the same time because it is different cast, and while I might not personally care about Sony characters as much as the next guy, let sony fans have this brawler.


what Sony fan tried to say that Smash Bros WASN'T and inspiration for Battle Royale?


Well trying to justify it that is unique enough, I don't really see distinction to say that it is that different, and I know fans don't want much difference. 

(Also I can't tell some user are joking or not in their post.)

1. All stages are mash-up from 2 different games
2. Variety of characters from Kratos to Sly Cooper
3. Online component that most likely works
4. HD Visuals at 60 FPS
5. No health bar or life limit. The only way to win is to pump out your super moves which are 1-hit KOs.(Biggest Different between the 2 games IMO)
6. Potential for a long life with DLC and game updates.

All this alone makes the game different enough to make even a Smash Bros fan buy the game if they got a PS3.


The bolded is the only real distinction. The other stuff is hardly note worthy considering they hardly effect gameplay except for maybe it having Sony characters, but obviously it's going to have Sony chracters, that's the whole point.



Food for thought: Shove an apple in your brain

o_O.Q said:

wow the nintendo fanboys aren't taking this news easy at all i just went to youtube to watch some of the footage for this game and happen to look through the comments to find it is dominated by nintendo fanboys

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6hKrSRqv6e8&email=comment_reply_received&lc=S9RfVQgl1UMAJniMFTkFvaY6onBHgDy9UEFamhhuuRM&lch=email_reply&feature=email

 

i'm honestly beginning to wonder if the team making the game should start fearing for their lives

I wouldn't be surprised if they've received death threats from the crazy Nintendo die-hards lol



logic56 said:
Runa216 said:
so of those who have been watching, does it look fun?

actually as disapointed as I am that it's in no way original it does look fun

think smash bros but with playstation characters


This is the kind of game that PlayStation gamers have wanted for at least five years now. There hasn't been much announced this was just to get the hype building and so far it's working.

Every stage fights against the players as well as it's self. Just look at the Hades level that gets invaded by the Patapon. Everything appears to be interactive from the trailers I've seen.

Anyway, I'm excited for this game. Name isn't the best, but there is still time to tweak or change it.



DepthAlly said:
VGKing said:
Acevil said:
enditall727 said:
Acevil said:
Okay seriously, now this is gone for awhile.
Sony fans: Even the website that played the game state the obvious inspiration of the game, it is pretty obvious, sugar coat it all you want.

Nintendo fans: Seriously so what if it is a clone of a beloved franchise, it is different at the same time because it is different cast, and while I might not personally care about Sony characters as much as the next guy, let sony fans have this brawler.


what Sony fan tried to say that Smash Bros WASN'T and inspiration for Battle Royale?


Well trying to justify it that is unique enough, I don't really see distinction to say that it is that different, and I know fans don't want much difference. 

(Also I can't tell some user are joking or not in their post.)

1. All stages are mash-up from 2 different games
2. Variety of characters from Kratos to Sly Cooper
3. Online component that most likely works
4. HD Visuals at 60 FPS
5. No health bar or life limit. The only way to win is to pump out your super moves which are 1-hit KOs.(Biggest Different between the 2 games IMO)
6. Potential for a long life with DLC and game updates.

All this alone makes the game different enough to make even a Smash Bros fan buy the game if they got a PS3.


The bolded is the only real distinction. The other stuff is hardly note worthy considering they hardly effect gameplay except for maybe it having Sony characters, but obviously it's going to have Sony chracters, that's the whole point.

It does affect gameplay. In the God of War level, Hades attacks the players.
In the LBP level the pop up thing can create new platforms and erase them. One it turns in to the Buzz! level, it asks you a question and if you don't stand on the right platform you get stunned or something.

Everything I said is a real distinction. You can't deny that.

Smash Bros isn't HD, it has no DLC, online is broken and stages are limited to 1 franchsie.



Around the Network
VGKing said:
DepthAlly said:
VGKing said:
Acevil said:
enditall727 said:
Acevil said:
Okay seriously, now this is gone for awhile.
Sony fans: Even the website that played the game state the obvious inspiration of the game, it is pretty obvious, sugar coat it all you want.

Nintendo fans: Seriously so what if it is a clone of a beloved franchise, it is different at the same time because it is different cast, and while I might not personally care about Sony characters as much as the next guy, let sony fans have this brawler.


what Sony fan tried to say that Smash Bros WASN'T and inspiration for Battle Royale?


Well trying to justify it that is unique enough, I don't really see distinction to say that it is that different, and I know fans don't want much difference. 

(Also I can't tell some user are joking or not in their post.)

1. All stages are mash-up from 2 different games
2. Variety of characters from Kratos to Sly Cooper
3. Online component that most likely works
4. HD Visuals at 60 FPS
5. No health bar or life limit. The only way to win is to pump out your super moves which are 1-hit KOs.(Biggest Different between the 2 games IMO)
6. Potential for a long life with DLC and game updates.

All this alone makes the game different enough to make even a Smash Bros fan buy the game if they got a PS3.


The bolded is the only real distinction. The other stuff is hardly note worthy considering they hardly effect gameplay except for maybe it having Sony characters, but obviously it's going to have Sony chracters, that's the whole point.

It does affect gameplay. In the God of War level, Hades attacks the players.
In the LBP level the pop up thing can create new platforms and erase them. One it turns in to the Buzz! level, it asks you a question and if you don't stand on the right platform you get stunned or something.

Everything I said is a real distinction. You can't deny that.

Smash Bros isn't HD, it has no DLC, online is broken and stages are limited to 1 franchsie.

You just described stages that effect the battles, which Smash Bros already did. Also, HD and DLC is just something it has to have because every game has it. It's hardly an actual distinction from Smash Bros' gameplay.



Food for thought: Shove an apple in your brain

Examiners impressions

Sony has finally unveiled its Smash Bros themed game that has been rumored for months.  The game is now calledPlayStation Battle All-Stars Royale.  This new title is completely  unnecessary, and Sony should have not put the game into production.  While the game might turn out to be fun, the consumers of Baltimore should question Sony as to why it is blatantly ripping off Nintendo.  

PlayStation Battle All-Stars Royal is nothing more than a cash grab at the casual market.  Sony does not need a game like this.  A lot of franchises associated with the PlayStation platform never made it to the big leagues.  Parappa the Rapper is just one title that did not become a staple franchise.  The casual crowd is not going to pick up Sony’sSmash Bros clone to play as Parappa.  Sweet Tooth might have been popular back in the PS1 days, but he is no longer well known by today’s mainstream crowd.  It is also doubtful that most people recognize where Fat Princess comes from.  Since the majority of consumers have no idea who Sony’s characters are, then this game will probably fall flat when it releases. 

Sony needs to stick to the foundation of what made PlayStation great in the first place.  The PlayStation brand has never been about parties or local multiplayer.  All of the biggest games on the platform have always focused on singleplayer gameplay.  Games like SpyroCrash Bandicoot,Metal Gear SolidFinal FantasyJak and DaxterGod of War,Uncharted, and Infamous are all games that were built to be played by one person.  Sony already tried to hit the casual crowd with the PlayStation Move, and the peripheral ended up being a moderate success.  The company does not need to lose anymore money trying to woo people outside of its core users.    

Sony seems to be losing its direction with the PS3.  It first produces the game Little Big Planet Karting which will destroyModnation Racers property.  now the company will fall deeper into the financial hole from creating PlayStation Battle All-Stars.  Sony is in the middle of an identity crisis and needs to find itself again.

http://www.examiner.com/article/is-sony-facing-an-identity-crisis



Nsanity said:

Examiners impressions

 

Sony has finally unveiled its Smash Bros themed game that has been rumored for months.  The game is now calledPlayStation Battle All-Stars Royale.  This new title is completely  unnecessary, and Sony should have not put the game into production.  While the game might turn out to be fun, the consumers of Baltimore should question Sony as to why it is blatantly ripping off Nintendo.  

PlayStation Battle All-Stars Royal is nothing more than a cash grab at the casual market.  Sony does not need a game like this.  A lot of franchises associated with the PlayStation platform never made it to the big leagues.  Parappa the Rapper is just one title that did not become a staple franchise.  The casual crowd is not going to pick up Sony’sSmash Bros clone to play as Parappa.  Sweet Tooth might have been popular back in the PS1 days, but he is no longer well known by today’s mainstream crowd.  It is also doubtful that most people recognize where Fat Princess comes from.  Since the majority of consumers have no idea who Sony’s characters are, then this game will probably fall flat when it releases. 

Sony needs to stick to the foundation of what made PlayStation great in the first place.  The PlayStation brand has never been about parties or local multiplayer.  All of the biggest games on the platform have always focused on singleplayer gameplay.  Games like SpyroCrash Bandicoot,Metal Gear SolidFinal FantasyJak and DaxterGod of War,Uncharted, and Infamous are all games that were built to be played by one person.  Sony already tried to hit the casual crowd with the PlayStation Move, and the peripheral ended up being a moderate success.  The company does not need to lose anymore money trying to woo people outside of its core users.    

Sony seems to be losing its direction with the PS3.  It first produces the game Little Big Planet Karting which will destroyModnation Racers property.  now the company will fall deeper into the financial hole from creating PlayStation Battle All-StarsSony is in the middle of an identity crisis and needs to find itself again.

http://www.examiner.com/article/is-sony-facing-an-identity-crisis

 


@ bolded..not half wrong actually



Nsanity said:

Examiners impressions

 

Sony has finally unveiled its Smash Bros themed game that has been rumored for months.  The game is now calledPlayStation Battle All-Stars Royale.  This new title is completely  unnecessary, and Sony should have not put the game into production.  While the game might turn out to be fun, the consumers of Baltimore should question Sony as to why it is blatantly ripping off Nintendo.  

PlayStation Battle All-Stars Royal is nothing more than a cash grab at the casual market.  Sony does not need a game like this.  A lot of franchises associated with the PlayStation platform never made it to the big leagues.  Parappa the Rapper is just one title that did not become a staple franchise.  The casual crowd is not going to pick up Sony’sSmash Bros clone to play as Parappa.  Sweet Tooth might have been popular back in the PS1 days, but he is no longer well known by today’s mainstream crowd.  It is also doubtful that most people recognize where Fat Princess comes from.  Since the majority of consumers have no idea who Sony’s characters are, then this game will probably fall flat when it releases. 

Sony needs to stick to the foundation of what made PlayStation great in the first place.  The PlayStation brand has never been about parties or local multiplayer.  All of the biggest games on the platform have always focused on singleplayer gameplay.  Games like SpyroCrash Bandicoot,Metal Gear SolidFinal FantasyJak and DaxterGod of War,Uncharted, and Infamous are all games that were built to be played by one person.  Sony already tried to hit the casual crowd with the PlayStation Move, and the peripheral ended up being a moderate success.  The company does not need to lose anymore money trying to woo people outside of its core users.    

Sony seems to be losing its direction with the PS3.  It first produces the game Little Big Planet Karting which will destroyModnation Racers property.  now the company will fall deeper into the financial hole from creating PlayStation Battle All-Stars.  Sony is in the middle of an identity crisis and needs to find itself again.

http://www.examiner.com/article/is-sony-facing-an-identity-crisis

 

/FACEPALM

So much ignorance wrong with that article. I'll just copy and paste a comment someone made on the comments.

1. This game isn't aimed at the casual market. It is made for the Playstation community who has been asking for this game FOR YEARS.

2. No, many characters in the game might not be recognizable to the casual player. THAT IS EXACTLY WHY THIS GAME IS BEING MADE. To bring awareness to these great characters. You can't tell me you knew all the characters in Smash Bros. Characters like Fox, Falco, Mr. Game and Watch, Captain Falcon, Ike, Ice Climbers and Lucas....etc. Many people only got introduced to these characters because of Smash Bros. Many of the characters in Smash Bros like those I listed never made it into the "big leagues" either. 

3. Playstation 3 is known for a variety of games. Playstation All-Stars is filling one of the few gaps in the PS3s games library.



ImJustBayuum said:
Nsanity said:

Examiners impressions

 

Sony has finally unveiled its Smash Bros themed game that has been rumored for months.  The game is now calledPlayStation Battle All-Stars Royale.  This new title is completely  unnecessary, and Sony should have not put the game into production.  While the game might turn out to be fun, the consumers of Baltimore should question Sony as to why it is blatantly ripping off Nintendo.  

PlayStation Battle All-Stars Royal is nothing more than a cash grab at the casual market.  Sony does not need a game like this.  A lot of franchises associated with the PlayStation platform never made it to the big leagues.  Parappa the Rapper is just one title that did not become a staple franchise.  The casual crowd is not going to pick up Sony’sSmash Bros clone to play as Parappa.  Sweet Tooth might have been popular back in the PS1 days, but he is no longer well known by today’s mainstream crowd.  It is also doubtful that most people recognize where Fat Princess comes from.  Since the majority of consumers have no idea who Sony’s characters are, then this game will probably fall flat when it releases. 

Sony needs to stick to the foundation of what made PlayStation great in the first place.  The PlayStation brand has never been about parties or local multiplayer.  All of the biggest games on the platform have always focused on singleplayer gameplay.  Games like SpyroCrash Bandicoot,Metal Gear SolidFinal FantasyJak and DaxterGod of War,Uncharted, and Infamous are all games that were built to be played by one person.  Sony already tried to hit the casual crowd with the PlayStation Move, and the peripheral ended up being a moderate success.  The company does not need to lose anymore money trying to woo people outside of its core users.    

Sony seems to be losing its direction with the PS3.  It first produces the game Little Big Planet Karting which will destroyModnation Racers property.  now the company will fall deeper into the financial hole from creating PlayStation Battle All-StarsSony is in the middle of an identity crisis and needs to find itself again.

http://www.examiner.com/article/is-sony-facing-an-identity-crisis

 


@ bolded..not half wrong actually


Theat couldn't be farther from the truth. Sony knows exactly what PS3 owners want. All-Stars is made specifically for these die-hard Playstation fans.
The Last of Us is a new IP directed at the core gamer. God of War Ascention is as well. LittleBigPlanet Karting is made for the more casual player and obviously meant to attract kids as well.

Whoever wrote that article seems mad that Sony is making games that aren't super gory and have super duper graphics.
There are plenty of PS3 owners who miss the Spyro and Crash Bandicoot games from the PS1 era.  The Playsation fanbase is the most diverse out of the Big 3.