By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Microsoft Discussion - Update: Jury awards Microsoft $15 million in Motorola patent case

Joystiq

Microsoft has been awarded $15 million in damages by a jury following a patent infringement lawsuit first filed by Motorola in 2010. Motorola spokesman William Moss said in a statement (via the Seattle Times) that the company was "disappointed" but is looking forward "to an appeal of the novel legal issues raised in this case."

Motorola Mobility claimed Microsoft had infringed upon five different patents in the original lawsuit, though four were eventually dismissed over the years. The fifth patent, which deals with peer-to-peer communication between two wireless devices, then became the focus of the case over the last few years.

The last year saw the most developments in the case, with ITC Judge David Shaw ruling in favor of Motorola in April of last year. Shaw then pushed for an Xbox import ban in the US the following month, only to have the ITC remand his decision and push it back to an administrative law judge for a second look. The suit then went through the process again, though Shaw ruled in Microsoft's favor the second time around.

http://www.joystiq.com/2013/09/07/jury-awards-microsoft-15-million-in-motorola-patent-case/



Around the Network

The only patent that Motorola has here is the video encoding patent involving H.264 and Microsoft is willing to pay royalties for it. However here is where the issue lies...

Microsoft is arguing that under FRAND (fair and non discriminatory) terms, Motorola is out of line. And I don't blame them...



Motorola is gonna get their ass kicked.



disolitude said:

The only patent that Motorola has here is the video encoding patent involving H.264 and Microsoft is willing to pay royalties for it. However here is where the issue lies...

 

Microsoft is arguing that under FRAND (fair and non discriminatory) terms, Motorola is out of line. And I don't blame them...


i see you post this in N4G and get tons of disagree,why?



D-Joe said:
disolitude said:

The only patent that Motorola has here is the video encoding patent involving H.264 and Microsoft is willing to pay royalties for it. However here is where the issue lies...

 

Microsoft is arguing that under FRAND (fair and non discriminatory) terms, Motorola is out of line. And I don't blame them...


i see you post this in N4G and get tons of disagree,why?

Huh? I didn't post this on N4G. I don't have an account there nor have I been to that site in years.



Around the Network
D-Joe said:
disolitude said:

The only patent that Motorola has here is the video encoding patent involving H.264 and Microsoft is willing to pay royalties for it. However here is where the issue lies...

 

Microsoft is arguing that under FRAND (fair and non discriminatory) terms, Motorola is out of line. And I don't blame them...


i see you post this in N4G and get tons of disagree,why?

The exact same comment is on N4G.... http://n4g.com/news/985042/bloomberg-motorola-mobility-wins-ruling-in-microsoft-xbox-patent-case/com 

I guess the disagrees is because siding with Microsoft is bad?



VGKing said:
D-Joe said:
disolitude said:

The only patent that Motorola has here is the video encoding patent involving H.264 and Microsoft is willing to pay royalties for it. However here is where the issue lies...

 

Microsoft is arguing that under FRAND (fair and non discriminatory) terms, Motorola is out of line. And I don't blame them...


i see you post this in N4G and get tons of disagree,why?

The exact same comment is on N4G.... http://n4g.com/news/985042/bloomberg-motorola-mobility-wins-ruling-in-microsoft-xbox-patent-case/com 

I guess the disagrees is because siding with Microsoft is bad?

WTF? Someone stole my exact post...lol

I feel violated and flattered at the same time.



disolitude said:
VGKing said:
D-Joe said:
disolitude said:

The only patent that Motorola has here is the video encoding patent involving H.264 and Microsoft is willing to pay royalties for it. However here is where the issue lies...

 

Microsoft is arguing that under FRAND (fair and non discriminatory) terms, Motorola is out of line. And I don't blame them...


i see you post this in N4G and get tons of disagree,why?

The exact same comment is on N4G.... http://n4g.com/news/985042/bloomberg-motorola-mobility-wins-ruling-in-microsoft-xbox-patent-case/com 

I guess the disagrees is because siding with Microsoft is bad?

WTF? Someone stole my exact post...lol

I feel violated and flattered at the same time.

LOL



Atto Suggests...:

Book - Malazan Book of the Fallen series 

Game - Metro Last Light

TV - Deadwood

Music - Forest Swords 

2,339 patents? What? A portfolio of over 17,000 patents? How much money is wasted each year trying to figure out who infringes who with which patents. Never mind bothering judges with this endless back and forth. What a nightmare.



i totally see dallas in this thread in 3...2...