By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Most disappointing game you've ever owned?

Chark said:

Runa216 said:
 Ocarina of Time is mediocre, guys, your nostalgia is blinding you.


To chime in, I've played this game over again reletively recently and I must say I can't quite agree with your sentiment. The game touched a lot of notes upon its release and it was created so well that it holds up to the test of time.

It was the first game to represent Zelda in a 3D environment, you might not consider this a great feat or you might even loathe it as it was an attack on a previous amazing game style that is 2D. Regardless, the world of OoT was masterful in contrast of color, in location placement, and in the manner your character interacted with the enviorment. Not in a I can do whatever I want and run and jump around like an idiot becasuse I can and this is a game, but in a way that displayed your character as having limitations to movement making your attempt at exploration more meaningful and puruposed.

Though this is nothing new today, it was the first Zelda to incorporate this sort of movement scale instead of the typical limitation of grid and perceived height. All of this gave the game a down to earth sort of feel for the world. You weren't some overpowered character or lost in an overly busy environment. The world felt like a backyard, a tiny earth, you could explore reletively easily with parts seperated by enough space to provide a cultural contrast between realms. It felt like you were exploring areas of importance, places you could return to and accomplish things when you were more capable. The world was welcoming and felt like home inbetween braving dungeons that were unkown and presented new puzzles. The conflict in the story presented an enveloped sense of doom and inspiring you to right it. The music was also well incorporated.

A lot of the game's merits had to do with the new experience that came with a crafted Zelda quality game. You can dissect other Zelda games to display their superiority over OoT. But OoT's total package presented at such a pivital time in the franchise and the gaming world as a whole will outweigh it. I could play other Zelda's and have a great time, but it will be hard to match the experience that I and many others had that made every action done in OoT more magical than other other Zelda has come close to accomplishing since. This is not nostolgia, this is a comparison of affect when playing a game. Perhaps your experience was altered by immense love for a previous title in the franchise? Link to the past? I never felt it was that in common with OoT. Perhaps you are too judgmental comparing two games while playing instead of the games as a whole first? Maybe you never had the opportunity to play OoT when it was released and therefore lost out on the experience.

I also replayed FF7 last year. While some aspects are dated and now I am less forgiven of poor story choices (temple of ancients ending) the game as a whole is a masterpiece. 3D character models and 2D backgrounds where did you go?... Anyway I could go on about FF7 more than I could about OoT, so I won't.

this is what bothers me, everyone assumes I played it late or that I'm comparing it too heavily to other games, or that I'm just being spiteful or whatever.  I review games here, I've been reviewing games and movies since I was 12, I can tell the difference between objective love and hate or subjective love and hate.  to clear up issues, I HATE ocarina of time. I loathe it, I think it's ugly as sin, the controls were annoying as fuck, and I hated almost everything about the game...but that has nothing to do with my objective analysis of the game.  objectively I Feel it was 'good' maybe even 'very good', but certainly not great or a masterpiece, and I Really, REALLY wish people would see this.  Not becuase I have bias,but becuase it's really not a masterpiece. 

so cool, it went 3D for the first time, whoopdee.  coming with the third dimension was a whole slew of problems; it handled most of them reasonably well, but compared to every other game in the series, both before and after, its controls were sluggish and annoying.  the graphics were ugly as fuck.  it gets credit for a relatively smoothe transition to 3D (donkey kong, megaman, and many others were unable to make the transition well, only mario and zelda did the transition with relative grace, and metroid got a pass since it skipped a generation), for that it gets credit, but come on, lasts forever?  the 'greatest game ever' or at least a true timeless classic remains good well past its time, which ocarina does not.  It gets credit for being good for its time, but every zelda since then has been objectively better, and previous entries held up better due to the fact that they were 2D and relatively simple.  



My Console Library:

PS5, Switch, XSX

PS4, PS3, PS2, PS1, WiiU, Wii, GCN, N64 SNES, XBO, 360

3DS, DS, GBA, Vita, PSP, Android

Around the Network

Your review is still your opinion
i dont care what u think
i replayed Oot on the 3ds an thought it was still a very good game for today standards
in 1998 Oot was the best game ever released on a system
PROFESSIONAL people reviewed the game and concluded it was the best
u r nobody
and nobody cares



Runa216 said:

this is what bothers me, everyone assumes I played it late or that I'm comparing it too heavily to other games, or that I'm just being spiteful or whatever.  I review games here, I've been reviewing games and movies since I was 12, I can tell the difference between objective love and hate or subjective love and hate.  to clear up issues, I HATE ocarina of time. I loathe it, I think it's ugly as sin, the controls were annoying as fuck, and I hated almost everything about the game...but that has nothing to do with my objective analysis of the game.  objectively I Feel it was 'good' maybe even 'very good', but certainly not great or a masterpiece, and I Really, REALLY wish people would see this.  Not becuase I have bias,but becuase it's really not a masterpiece. 

so cool, it went 3D for the first time, whoopdee.  coming with the third dimension was a whole slew of problems; it handled most of them reasonably well, but compared to every other game in the series, both before and after, its controls were sluggish and annoying.  the graphics were ugly as fuck.  it gets credit for a relatively smoothe transition to 3D (donkey kong, megaman, and many others were unable to make the transition well, only mario and zelda did the transition with relative grace, and metroid got a pass since it skipped a generation), for that it gets credit, but come on, lasts forever?  the 'greatest game ever' or at least a true timeless classic remains good well past its time, which ocarina does not.  It gets credit for being good for its time, but every zelda since then has been objectively better, and previous entries held up better due to the fact that they were 2D and relatively simple.  


I see. It must be hard to sit on the other side of the spectrum for this game. The graphics weren't very good but I never had an issue with the controls...despite that horrible controller. OoT was a simple game, not hard for most. It's still relatively high on my list even for being so old. People appreciate it because of the way it put its world together, and story. It had an effect and few games compared to it at the time. "Masterpiece" isn't the choice of one so since its held in such high regard it might qualify to be as such, but it is still only so for its time. Better games have been made since then and games will most likely always age.



Before the PS3 everyone was nice to me :(

In fact, I was not really that disappointed with games until this generation:

Scribblenauts
No More Heroes
Mad World
Red Dead Redemption
Zack and Wiki

Are all games I heard were supposed to be amazing, but I found them all to be less interesting than most 10 dollar shovelware games I picked up this generation.



I describe myself as a little dose of toxic masculinity.

DieAppleDie said:
Your review is still your opinion
i dont care what u think
i replayed Oot on the 3ds an thought it was still a very good game for today standards
in 1998 Oot was the best game ever released on a system
PROFESSIONAL people reviewed the game and concluded it was the best
u r nobody
and nobody cares


And yet he has  right to his own opinion

I agree with you that Ocarina of Time was and still is the greatest game ever. But if somebody dislikes it then there is nothing you can do about. And you certainly don´t have the right to insult somebody just because you don´t like his opinion.



Around the Network

Boom Blox. It's probably the most disappointing thing that Steven Spielberg has ever been involved with. Even more than that last Indy movie.



Proud member of the SONIC SUPPORT SQUAD

Tag "Sorry man. Someone pissed in my Wheaties."

"There are like ten games a year that sell over a million units."  High Voltage CEO -  Eric Nofsinger

AndrewWK said:
DieAppleDie said:
Your review is still your opinion
i dont care what u think
i replayed Oot on the 3ds an thought it was still a very good game for today standards
in 1998 Oot was the best game ever released on a system
PROFESSIONAL people reviewed the game and concluded it was the best
u r nobody
and nobody cares


And yet he has  right to his own opinion

I agree with you that Ocarina of Time was and still is the greatest game ever. But if somebody dislikes it then there is nothing you can do about. And you certainly don´t have the right to insult somebody just because you don´t like his opinion.

but shouldn't the 'best game ever' be timeless?  super Mario 3 is timeless, it's as fun today as it was in the 80's.  super Mario World is timeless, Link to the Past is timeless, whereas Ocarina of Time hasn't aged well.  Graphically it's ugly as sin, the controls are clunky as hell, and the game is full of things that just aren't good design choices.  for its time, it gets credit for managing to take Zelda into the 3rd dimension, but of all time, it's merely a stepping stone that has long since been surpassed in quality. 

Hell, I'd argue that, thanks to the controls, graphics, and design issues, it wasn't even all that good for its time.  Huge step back in fluidity and content from Link to the Past.  

Games that don't age well cannot be the best of all time, at best I'd be generous and say it was the best of its time, but I can think of a dozen games from its generation that were objectively better.  yes, Final Fantasy VII is one of them.  



My Console Library:

PS5, Switch, XSX

PS4, PS3, PS2, PS1, WiiU, Wii, GCN, N64 SNES, XBO, 360

3DS, DS, GBA, Vita, PSP, Android

There are quite a few.

The most dissappointing would be Age of Empires 3, i was soo hyped and AOE2 was my favourite game of all time, and AoE3 turned out to be one of the worst games of all time.. :(

Also, Turok Evolution is also one of my favourite games of all time, and the sequel to that was also absolute garbage too. D:



man-bear-pig said:
There are quite a few.

The most dissappointing would be Age of Empires 3, i was soo hyped and AOE2 was my favourite game of all time, and AoE3 turned out to be one of the worst games of all time.. :(

Also, Turok Evolution is also one of my favourite games of all time, and the sequel to that was also absolute garbage too. D:

I hear you. I listed it myself on my top 10 disappointments list, mostly because of how amazing AoE II: Age of Kings was and how average and shitty AoE III was. Not only that, they destroyed the MP component entirely, which was probably one of the best I ever played (back on AoE II).



Current PC Build

CPU - i7 8700K 3.7 GHz (4.7 GHz turbo) 6 cores OC'd to 5.2 GHz with Watercooling (Hydro Series H110i) | MB - Gigabyte Z370 HD3P ATX | Gigabyte GTX 1080ti Gaming OC BLACK 11G (1657 MHz Boost Core / 11010 MHz Memory) | RAM - Corsair DIMM 32GB DDR4, 2400 MHz | PSU - Corsair CX650M (80+ Bronze) 650W | Audio - Asus Essence STX II 7.1 | Monitor - Samsung U28E590D 4K UHD, Freesync, 1 ms, 60 Hz, 28"

Devil May Cry 2
PoP: Warrior Within
The Witcher