by you saying stupid things like this completely discredits any opinion you have on the matter.

under no objective standards is either ME2 or Skyrim if remotely considered near the best graphics. especially skyrim.

to even mention these games with the graphical likes of GOW3 is laughable. not to mention Skyrim has no graphics of the year, and is average at best graphically (pretty good for open world though), and ME2 which got destroyed in best graphics by GOW3.

this is very telling about you. you really have no say on the matter with these kinds of statements. it seems you just cant accept when a system not to your preference clearly produces better graphics

SMH at this thread.

Sad to see there`s still a lot of close minded fan boys.
Like someone said already, best graphics is subjective really. For me, Uncharted 3 looks the best.

This post has been modertaed ~ Barozi

PS3 most powerful system this gen.

Is also a bitch and a half to develop for, and cost $599 at launch, leading to Sony losing many of their exclusives and thus their advantage over their competition.

/thread

You guys be the judge.

Killzone 3 VS. Crysis 2.

http://www.lensoftruth.com/head2head-killzone-3-vs-crysis-2-analysis/

Who said that Killzone 2 and Killzone 3 looks the same???

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-vs-killzone-3

Some Notable qoute!!

Killzone 2

"In a genre where technology plays such an important part in defining the gameplay experience, Killzone 2 was a world apart from its competition." 

Killzone 3

"Whether it's down to improved art direction, enhanced tech, or (as is most likely the case) a combination of the two, there's no denying that Guerrilla's latest shooter is a clear visual upgrade from Killzone 2.

Probably the biggest difference in the sequel is just how much lighter, brighter and more sharply defined the visuals are in comparison to Killzone 2. The dark and grungy atmosphere we're accustomed to rolls out across several levels, but the combination of a new anti-aliasing technique and dialled back post-processing allows more of the detail in the core art assets to shine this time around. When the location shifts to the more exotic locations in the game, the detail level is phenomenal - after the superb jungle level, the Scrapyard stage in particular stands out as a real visual highlight."

I also read that the only advantage of uncharted is it has veggies on it.

This thread is phenomenal. Keep it going.

Me posting this comment doesn't really help matters, but I sincerely hope this thread dies soon. "Graphic king" threads bring out the worst in you people. Nothing is gained from this but feeding into people's bias.

Fanboys be damned.

what is this some kind of fanboy war thread?

I realized that.... If you look up I refered to Aldros as a King since he kept refering to himself in plural.

You know the arguement they made is an arguement they made against themselves? All I said is after UC3, it's opinion, 360, PS3, and Multiplatform games all have some really great award winning contenders.

Some people can't accept other peoples opinion...

I said that, LOL, and I'm being labeled as the biased one here.

I can see why most people like Uncharted 3 the most, I personally like Forza 4, but if I had to give it to the most beautiful game (Forza is just metal, plastic, road, and road..), I'd give it to Uncharted 3.

After Uncharted 3, I think Gears 3, but I think (as shown above) everyone has a different #2.

Can't wait to start Mass Effect 3 and see how it compares.

You realize pre-alpha is also pre-demo? It's unfinished and generally unplayable...... IGN played a playable level, and said Gears 2 looked better.

Also Killzone 2 released 3 months after Gears, really not that far off. I like how 7 months is nearly a year, and 4 months is a couple (meaning 2).

Do you accept these facts? or am I biased again?