By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics Discussion - Syria Violence: Should someone step in?

 

If someone steps in, who should it be?

NATO 14 26.42%
 
America 3 5.66%
 
Neighboring Nation 11 20.75%
 
Other power 2 3.77%
 
No one 15 28.30%
 
other 2 3.77%
 
See Resultz 6 11.32%
 
Total:53
Rath on 08 March 2012

Yes, the Arabs damned well should. It's a massacre.



Around the Network
Sal.Paradise on 08 March 2012

Of course someone should fucking step in. Too bad about Russia and China though. The UN just can't do anything about this, militarily.



Carl on 08 March 2012

Someone should've stepped in a long time ago.



                            

IEATBABIES on 08 March 2012

Due to political reasons, it's not in UN's interest to step in.



Rath on 08 March 2012
IEATBABIES said:
Due to political reasons, it's not in UN's and it's allies interest to step in.


How does the UN have allies?



Around the Network
snakenobi on 08 March 2012

Nope

 

 

NATO wants to step in just to start a war with IRAN down the road

 

good Russia and China Vetoed it



Samus_Aran on 08 March 2012

Yeah it would have to be NATO, the UN is useless while Russia is busy selling arms to Syria. Hopefully a Libya style attack whilst arming and supporting the resistance, without troops on the ground.



Wii Friend Code: 6138 6258 1100 8121       3DS Friend Code: 3609 1395 1239

Rath on 08 March 2012
snakenobi said:

Nope

 

 

NATO wants to step in just to start a war with IRAN down the road

 

good Russia and China Vetoed it


So what do you think about the situation in Syria and what could be done to solve it?

Clearly the status-quo is not an ideal situation.



snakenobi on 08 March 2012
Rath said:
snakenobi said:

Nope

 

 

NATO wants to step in just to start a war with IRAN down the road

 

good Russia and China Vetoed it


So what do you think about the situation in Syria and what could be done to solve it?

Clearly the status-quo is not an ideal situation.

what do you think about the status-quo in USA and europe with the bankers and palestinians with israelies

 

cleary those are also not ideal situations and actually much worse then what Syria is.

 

 

Why not let the greeks overthrow their government or sack the US congress and make Ron Paul president?



Rath on 08 March 2012
snakenobi said:
Rath said:
snakenobi said:


So what do you think about the situation in Syria and what could be done to solve it?

Clearly the status-quo is not an ideal situation.

what do you think about the status-quo in USA and europe with the bankers and palestinians with israelies

 

cleary those are also not ideal situations and actually much worse then what Syria is.

 

 

Why not let the greeks overthrow their government or sack the US congress and make Ron Paul president?

The hell you talking about?

None of those situations are even close to what's happening in Syria. I agree whats happening in Palestine is atrocious and the banking system is a mess but in Syria the government is systematically killing thousands of its own people.

You really really need to have a massive anti-west bias to think that what's happening in the USA is more atrocious than what's happening in Syria.