OPMuk have given it an 8/10
From what was said in the print, it sounds like it counters a lot of my issues with 13 it self.
http://www.officialplaystationmagazine.co.uk/review/final-fantasy-xiii-2-ps3-review/
Does this change your mind? | |||
Nah, it's still gonna suck | 9 | 22.50% | |
No, I'm not 100% convinced | 2 | 5.00% | |
I'm still 50-50 | 4 | 10.00% | |
Yeah...I'm more positive now | 6 | 15.00% | |
Yes! Been hyped for this since day one!! | 14 | 35.00% | |
Wait...did you say "... | 5 | 12.50% | |
Total: | 40 |
OPMuk have given it an 8/10
From what was said in the print, it sounds like it counters a lot of my issues with 13 it self.
http://www.officialplaystationmagazine.co.uk/review/final-fantasy-xiii-2-ps3-review/
Apparently there are more, I just didn't realise the thread that said "5/10" was a reviews thread cumulating all the different scores.
GT amongst others gave it an 8.8/10
May want to change the title, there aren't that many "negative" scores. An 8/10 is certainly not bad.
I kind of wish he would change the title. if you can do that, because I got confused too. and I was the one giving him the scores. haha.
There's been numerous places that gave the original a high score, and said this is a lot better. And yet, gave this a lower to much lower score.
I loved XIII personally.
but, my thinking is, is that some of the reviewers didn't have the balls to give Final Fantasy a lower score before. Which is not a good reflection of said reviewers.
It's just kind of strange for the original to get 9's, and stuff from certain players. Have them say its a much better game. And it gets an 8, or 7.5 or whatever.
I know the quality of games changes with time. But, honestly I can't say JRPG's have taken off as opposed to 2 years ago.
From the reviews I have read it says they fixed a lot of the problems from the first one but its still not groundbreaking.
a part two of a game I didn't like, does not become a game I want to play by fixing a few things and changing others.