Should Sony charge for PSN membership? | |||
| Yes, it makes sense. | 108 | 24.16% | |
| NO! | 297 | 66.44% | |
| I couldn't care less, man-bear-pig! | 42 | 9.40% | |
| Total: | 447 | ||
because its for the players.
| XboneWins said: Oh wow. This is pure gold. What do you sony fans think of the paywall now? :D |
Again, does it really matter? when you can still play online multi-player Games with out even needing Playstation +
before you say, but those are just free 2 play Games , well So be it, it still allows you to play Online Multi-player without the Playstation+ Requirement.
Same now with Microsoft xboxlive silver with games like Spark.
I AM BOLO
100% lover "nothing else matter's" after that...
ps:
Proud psOne/2/3/p owner. I survived Aplcalyps3 and all I got was this lousy Signature.
Last time I checked, sony charges for multiplayer in all but select games, so I don't understand the point of this thread.
Because they charge for PS+, right?
Been away for a bit, but sneaking back in.
Gaming on: PS4, PC, 3DS. Got a Switch! Mainly to play Smash
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2024 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
