By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Why doesnt Sony charge for PSN membership?

 

Should Sony charge for PSN membership?

Yes, it makes sense. 108 24.16%
 
NO! 297 66.44%
 
I couldn't care less, man-bear-pig! 42 9.40%
 
Total:447
Metroid33slayer said:
 

Because it is a pay wall. You can massage the facts all you want but the point remains that you have to pay to play online and wether you get cheap games that you probably don't want is beside the point. You have already given them your money for the 'honour' of accessing online multiplayer. Get real mr sony, they are no better than microsoft.


You see, it is up to the game developers to make that choice. You don't need PS+ to play Warframe, or Final Fantasy XIV:ARR. You don't even need PS+ to play Netflix and other subscription services..but, you do for Xbox LIVE... Goddamn this Thread is OLD.



CPU: Ryzen 7950X
GPU: MSI 4090 SUPRIM X 24G
Motherboard: MSI MEG X670E GODLIKE
RAM: CORSAIR DOMINATOR PLATINUM 32GB DDR5
SSD: Kingston FURY Renegade 4TB
Gaming Console: PLAYSTATION 5
Around the Network
Seece said:
They don't like money?

No seriously, I really think they put profit below other things when they shouldn't be.

 

EDIT: didn't realize how old this thread is, sorry xD



Metroid33slayer said:
room414 said:
Metroid33slayer said:
room414 said:

How in the hell is getting a ton of good games for a ridiculously low price bad for gamers or getting screwed? Why are you ignoring all the benefits of ps+ and only seeing a paywall? That's not what it is. 

And stop concluding your comments with your homosexual fantasies. No one wants to hear that.

Because it is a pay wall. You can massage the facts all you want but the point remains that you have to pay to play online and wether you get cheap games that you probably don't want is beside the point. You have already given them your money for the 'honour' of accessing online multiplayer. Get real mr sony, they are no better than microsoft.

Right, cheap games that nobody wants and you're just paying for the 'honour' of accessing online multiplayer, that's why ps+ has millions of subscribers already with a 95% satisfaction rate. lol

Remove online multiplayer from the xbox paywall and you have something no one would pay for. Remove online multiplayer from ps+ on ps4 and you still have a valuable service worth paying for. Of course there will also be people who pay for it just for multiplayer but they will still get good value apart from that whether they know it or not prior to subscribing. 

Is sony better than microsoft? Of course not. They're both just corporations that want your money. But trying to equate the xbox paywall to ps+ and pointing fingers at people willing to pay for ps+ but not xbox live as if they're hypocrites is just plain dumb. 

Are you working for Sony in PR?


Its true what he's saying. He's not sticking up for Sony. A lot of sites have been talking about the same thing, saying that PSN+ gives Xbox Live a bad name. 



Oh cool another PS+ vs XBL argument.

XBL trumps the hell out of PS+ as an online gaming service.
PS+ trumps the hell out of XBL as a membership discount/game rental service.



Th3PANO said:
Seece said:
They don't like money?

No seriously, I really think they put profit below other things when they shouldn't be.

 

EDIT: didn't realize how old this thread is, sorry xD


Hey hey, it seems Sony likes money these days!!! :P



 

Around the Network
S.T.A.G.E. said:
Its supposed to be free, the only thing MS has influenced them to do is take more and more of peoples money. Sony and Nintendo had the right idea.

Naturally when Sony, the life insurance company, decides to "take more of peoples money" you somehow find a way to blame it on MS "influencing them" LOL.



J_Allard said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
Its supposed to be free, the only thing MS has influenced them to do is take more and more of peoples money. Sony and Nintendo had the right idea.

Naturally when Sony, the life insurance company, decides to "take more of peoples money" you somehow find a way to blame it on MS "influencing them" LOL.

Technically PSN will always be free. Sony had to find a decent way to get your money and tack multiplayer onto it. 



S.T.A.G.E. said:
J_Allard said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
Its supposed to be free, the only thing MS has influenced them to do is take more and more of peoples money. Sony and Nintendo had the right idea.

Naturally when Sony, the life insurance company, decides to "take more of peoples money" you somehow find a way to blame it on MS "influencing them" LOL.

Technically PSN will always be free. Sony had to find a decent way to get your money and tack multiplayer onto it. 

Except it isn't, you need to pay for it to play multiplayer = paywall.





 

S.T.A.G.E. said:
J_Allard said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
Its supposed to be free, the only thing MS has influenced them to do is take more and more of peoples money. Sony and Nintendo had the right idea.

Naturally when Sony, the life insurance company, decides to "take more of peoples money" you somehow find a way to blame it on MS "influencing them" LOL.

Technically PSN will always be free. Sony had to find a decent way to get your money and tack multiplayer onto it. 

Technically who cares? Technically XBL is free. We're talking about paying to play online.



Seece said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
J_Allard said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
Its supposed to be free, the only thing MS has influenced them to do is take more and more of peoples money. Sony and Nintendo had the right idea.

Naturally when Sony, the life insurance company, decides to "take more of peoples money" you somehow find a way to blame it on MS "influencing them" LOL.

Technically PSN will always be free. Sony had to find a decent way to get your money and tack multiplayer onto it. 

Except it isn't, you need to pay for it to play multiplayer = paywall.




Not every Playstation gamer likes multiplayer and cross chat and all the goodies outside of multiplayer will always be there free. Xbox Live Gold is the truest of all paywalls in gaming.