Sullla said: Griffin said: The PS3/360 are great for the industry, they have the ability to force small and crappy developers to leave the industry or be bought out. The wii/DS are allowing small game companies to make shitty games.
If Nintendo cared about the industry they would re-invest their money back into their company, instead they just sit around with billions of dollars doing nothing to make better games, they make crappy games for the most part, just imagine what SMG or Zelda could of been if Nintendo invested more then the bare minimum into their games. |
Sorry for reviving something from the first page, but this is the single stupidest comment I've ever seen here at VGChartz, and among the dumbest things I've ever seen on the Internet, period. I sincerely hope you're being sarcastic, although your second comment seemed to confirm this first one. I mean, it's at least somewhat forgivable when a random fanboy spouts off nonsense about their console of choice. That's not particuarly intelligent, but there's some kind of weird warped sense of honor there. A marketplace with no smaller developers simply means little to no innovation taking place. As gamers, I think we can all agree that that would be a bad thing. |
Sadly, it is not. But what gets me how many hardcore gamers that believe that if a game isn't one that they like, then by definition, it is shitty. Or at best, a grudging, "I don't like racing games, but that one is supposed to be good."
Just because as a hardcore you don't have fun with a MP8 or WiiSports or Nintendogs or BrainAge, doesn't mean that the people, that do buy those games, are idiots. And that these types of games shouldn't have been made. If the game is fun, and lots of people think so(even if you don't), then it is a good game.
Someone made a comment on the handheld (casual) fishing games that got popular 3 years ago and now are not. How many games have the hardcore players bought 3 years ago, and now don't play them regularly? To me that shows, casual gamers are going to get bored with just one game and want to move on to new games as well.
We always hear from the 3rd party developer that they just don't do well on Nintendo hardware. Why is it that none ever say why that is? At the very least, they could complain that the game engines that they have to develope for the Wii are so inferior to the ones that Nintendo developes for themselves. Or be honest and say, we put our 3rd rate team on N. products because the better teams don't like producing the types of games we want to make for the Wii, or whatever is the reason, rather than "I don't know / don't know how to create what the N. fans want to buy."