In response to Icyedge and Scoobes. Although apologies to Khuutra if you think I'm taking your thread off topic then I will stop posting and let you chronicle away.
To Icyedge I would in fact say the Final Fantasy name gave it a HUGE bonus with critics. The game had a ridiculous amount of hype and a very strong brand. If it had been an unbranded RPG then I think it would have really struggled. For example Blue Dragon got totally hammered for being linear and many reviews marked it down greatly for this and not being Oblivion. While FF13 was more linear and even though it was criticized for this the review scores didn't reflect it at all. From an objective view point though yes ff13 is very highly rated for a JRPG this gen.
To Scoobes. I think that actually this generation hasn't been too awful for Jrpgs. There are certainly less of them, but a big part of that was the PS2 getting vast amounts of lower budgeted rpgs, very few of which made any impact at all. This generation though there have been a pretty reasonable amount of great rpgs and new franchises, as well as quite a few interesting but flawed games. I would say Blue Dragon, Tales of Vesperia, Lost Odyssey, Star ocean 4 are all fantastic and with the exception of LO had really great battle systems.
Likewise Tales of Grace looks amazing. VC was a fantastic Srpg. Then the whole host of Trusty Bell, WKC, Infinite Undiscovery etc. Which were reasonable. Heck even at launch Enchanted arms was pretty good for a launch game. So while it hasn't been great I think there have been a fair amount of exciting Jrpgs. I still think BD is a spiritual successor to Chrono Trigger, LO has one of the most touching story and characters ever, SO4 and ToV have 2 of the best Jrpg combat systems and VC was a breathtakingly fantastic SRPG.