Again, Joe Danger had extra content and UFC 360 only made it above 70. Exceptions to the rule like anything but worth mentioning none the less.
It shouldnt matter if some games were from "ages ago" or "easy ports". Quality 360 game, Not on PS3, its in. Simple.
"Influenced by hype and incentives". This made me lol. Yes its all an anti Sony world out there or is it a MS conspiracy? Maybe both? LOL. Each game scored well on their own merits. Dont act like reviewers arent influenced by hype when writing reviews for PS3 exclusives like Uncharted 3. Door swings both ways.
Every major Halo release gets above 90. Spinoffs, expansions, and now remakes get above 80. Id say thats a damn good franchise. I say MILK AWAY if the milk tastes this damn good :). I suspect jealousy since no PS3 IP can touch a major Halo FPS sales and brand recognition, not to mention pop culture phenom status.You do realize that Halo 4 will be different from the previous entries, mainly your not fighting the Covenant? This alone will give the series a frssh feel, reviewers will love this.
Advertisement=brand reconition not quality. Couldnt agree more. A-AAA is quality. If a game gets both down, thats amazing to hear. But make no mistake....Brand recognition > quality. On a gaming forum this statement is controversial but my point is quality doesnt mean much if people just arent interested. Like a piece of quality produce at a grocery store that wilts cause nobody bought it when it was at its best. Im afraid this will be the case with most if not all PS3 2012 exclusives.
I havent argued the merits of these games? What do you think the list was? A-AAA games that scored in the 70s, 80s and 90s on metacritic. If that isnt arguing merit of a game then I dont know what does. If anything your the one who ignores quality of those games with stupid excuses like they are old, kinect based, or ports. Gimme a break.
What makes me think you ignored the several games that got extra content on ps3. It's the same game deal with it. Adding a bit more content does not an exclusvie make.
Oh please you can play those games on any computer made in the last decade. Unless you want to argue people with a ps3 don't have a pc made in the last decade you have no arguement. So sick of people pretneding games not on ps3 are 360 exclusive THEY AREN'T.
Yes it does, but we all know MS is alot better at that kind of thing then Sony. MS knows how to cheat and play dirty best.
Don't you find it a little inconsistent that the user review for halo reach is 7.5/10 on metacrtic where the ones who get antyhing from bonuses and the game early from MS to straight up cash from MS gave it 91/100? ps3 shooters might not reach halo status but ps3 has every other genre over 360, platformer, rpg, action adventure, hack and slash 360 exclusives can't hold a candle to most of the ps3 exclusives in their genre never mind the best ones. Also halo isn't that much better then most ps3 exclusive fpses merit wise. Hell what makes Halo Reach better then Resistence 3?
A bunch of reviews. Merits of the game is what makes it good not who was paid/influenced to say it's good. So now you know what argueing merits is.