theARTIST0017 said:
|
Nintendo is rumored to bring GCN games to VC. That is probably why they haven't announced anything on GCN conrtollers for the Wii U.
theARTIST0017 said:
|
Nintendo is rumored to bring GCN games to VC. That is probably why they haven't announced anything on GCN conrtollers for the Wii U.
why would i want 4 tablet support, I dont know 4 people in my town to play 4 players on 4 tablets. lol
Dr.Grass said:
I'm sorry but I think you are making no sense right there. |
worded that wrong, the console would have to be really powerful if it had to support 4
I don't care so much if I can use four tablet controllers.
I just want four good games for the thing.
Proud member of the SONIC SUPPORT SQUAD
Tag "Sorry man. Someone pissed in my Wheaties."
"There are like ten games a year that sell over a million units." High Voltage CEO - Eric Nofsinger
sethnintendo said:
|
The CCP is a much better controller, it's more versatile. The GC controller doesn't do well with fighters or sidescrollers, so I don't see why it would be necessary to support them.
HappySqurriel said: I don't know the implementation details, but from my understanding the tablet is just a "dummy" device and I wouldn't be surprised if it doesn't (really) have any processing power or memory on it; and it only displays the data that is streamed to it. If this is truly the case, I wouldn't be surprised if the system uses up the same wireless bandwidth to display a static image of buttons as a detailed real-time rendered image. The reason to take this approach is to keep the cost of the controller down because (outside of the cost of the screen) the tablet controller would be about as complicated and expensive as a conventional controller. With how inexpensive touch screens have gotten, it is possible that Nintendo could sell these controllers for $10 to $25 more than a conventional controller where it would be substantially more expensive to make them "smarter". |
You say that touch screens have gotten inexpensive and I know you mean "relatively inexpensive" and I wonder, how much does a multi touch screen cost than a simple touch screen?
I'm asking that because in my opinion, Nintendo should go with a multi touch display and 2 controllers. It would be more useful with mini games (1 screen for 2 players could lead to new competitive or cooperative games), as well as allowing more smartphones/tablet based games to come to WiiUware.
Please excuse my bad English.
Currently gaming on a PC with an i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070
Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.
oniyide said:
|
You'll never know whats behind the door until you open it right? I'm willing to buy. Me, my brother, my sister, and a fourth person always gather around for 4 player Mario Kart sessions. As long as the option is there, we don't see price as a factor. I'm sure others will second this.
NINTENDO
nintendo forever . . .
This is good news to me. Hopely then if you switch from the tv to the controller, the other controller can be the tv and the other can be your touch screen controller. In other words, if you transition from the tv you can still have two screen function.
cool two screens are better than one and i don't think i would want to buy 3 extra screens for multilayer. until now i only have two WiiMotes with + attachments and with Zelda i will get one more.
R.I.P Mr Iwata :'( | ||
how did Nintendo go from Party-friendly to single-player-centric????
Do they even care about retaining any of the current Wii casual gamers?
Soriku (Feb 10/08): In 5 years the PS3/360 will be dead.
KH3 bet: "If KH3 comes to Wii exclusive, I will take a 1 month of sig/avatar by otheres open a thread apologize and praise you guys' brilliance." http://vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?start=50&id=18379
Original cast: Badonkadonkhr, sc94597 allaboutthegames885, kingofwale, Soriku, ctk495, skeezer, RDBRaptor, Mirson,