By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony Discussion - just when you thought the uncharted 3 reviews could not get any worse...

Play4Fun on 01 November 2011

People who make a big deal out of game reviews and Metacritic scores are pathetic.

Yes, that's right...pathetic.



Around the Network
yo_john117 on 01 November 2011
brendude13 said:
yo_john117 said:
brendude13 said:
yo_john117 said:
Oh come on!! I'm sick of getting screwed in the meta prediction thread. And this score is not helping my dire situation >:(

This game NEEDS to get a 95.

The 50% score actually made the meta drop.

That's one thing I care about, the meta, it's getting trashed with review scores as low as that.

At this rate i'll be dead last in the meta prediction thread >_>

I need to get in on this, I think I could do very well at predicting meta's. To be honest, I thought a 95 would have been spot on though.

Anyway, been playing this game for about 45mins, I'm surprised at how story heavy it is. Definitely my kinda game.

It's too late to put your predictions in for that thread now though. 



gamelover2000 on 01 November 2011
Play4Fun said:
People who make a big deal out of game reviews and Metacritic scores are pathetic.

Yes, that's right...pathetic.

People might like predicting scores on metacritic... I don't really care for them either but you could atleast respect what other people like...

 

People who call other people pathetic are pathetic..

 

yes, that's right...pathetic.



Currently playing: MAG, Heavy Rain, Infamous

 

Getting Plat trophies for: Heavy Rain, Infamous, RE5,  Burnout and GOW collection once I get it.

 

yo_john117 on 01 November 2011
RolStoppable said:
kowenicki said:

I wasnt complaining about it... i just thought it would be funny if there was a retrospective release of names against scores for games on this site..... I'd quite like to see which users gave certain games 0/10.  Could ruin some peoples rep over night, great sport and lots of fun.   

From that point of view it would be funny indeed.

The thing is that games need to be added to one's collection in order to rate them, but unfortunately there's no way to display the users who have rated a game in a comfortable way. You would need to go through the profiles of suspects to see what score they gave Forza 4, but good luck finding those approximately 50 people who have added Forza 4 to their collection and rated it.

It would be nice if Vgchartz showed which users had which games and what they rated them. That would probably bring the trolling of said games to a minimum.



haxxiy on 02 November 2011

You guys are so funny it's almost laughable. It's just a goddamn score in some goddamn random site you won't even remember anymore one year or two from now on.

If you bet a certain score and playfully complains about it now, it's fine - but stop treating game reviews as if they were reviews to your own character, because that's what it's looking like. And stop being childish enough to think "oh man, everybody needs to give X game a 100 in meta Because It's The Exclusive Title Of My Favorite Company", and who cares whether the game deserves it or not, only the score matters!

Come the fuck on.



 

 

 

 

 

Around the Network
lestatdark on 02 November 2011
haxxiy said:
You guys are so funny it's almost laughable. It's just a goddamn score in some goddamn random site you won't even remember anymore one year or two from now on.

If you bet a certain score and playfully complains about it now, it's fine - but stop treating game reviews as if they were reviews to your own character, because that's what it's looking like. And stop being childish enough to think "oh man, everybody needs to give X game a 100 in meta Because It's The Exclusive Title Of My Favorite Company", and who cares whether the game deserves it or not, only the score matters!

Come the fuck on.

One year? Try one month after all the hype surrounding the game has died and everyone (or almost everyone) has moved on to another game. This is what really makes me sad about this generation, the goddamn fixation on scores and reviews as if they were the ultimate measuring stick of the worth of a game and not how is your experience with it. 

Acting like a bunch of fanatics (not even fanboys, this is becoming worse than that).



Current PC Build

CPU - i7 8700K 3.7 GHz (4.7 GHz turbo) 6 cores OC'd to 5.2 GHz with Watercooling (Hydro Series H110i) | MB - Gigabyte Z370 HD3P ATX | Gigabyte GTX 1080ti Gaming OC BLACK 11G (1657 MHz Boost Core / 11010 MHz Memory) | RAM - Corsair DIMM 32GB DDR4, 2400 MHz | PSU - Corsair CX650M (80+ Bronze) 650W | Audio - Asus Essence STX II 7.1 | Monitor - Samsung U28E590D 4K UHD, Freesync, 1 ms, 60 Hz, 28"

h2o1977 on 02 November 2011

its an over rated game....about time gamers saw this



brendude13 on 02 November 2011
yo_john117 said:
RolStoppable said:
kowenicki said:

I wasnt complaining about it... i just thought it would be funny if there was a retrospective release of names against scores for games on this site..... I'd quite like to see which users gave certain games 0/10.  Could ruin some peoples rep over night, great sport and lots of fun.   

From that point of view it would be funny indeed.

The thing is that games need to be added to one's collection in order to rate them, but unfortunately there's no way to display the users who have rated a game in a comfortable way. You would need to go through the profiles of suspects to see what score they gave Forza 4, but good luck finding those approximately 50 people who have added Forza 4 to their collection and rated it.

It would be nice if Vgchartz showed which users had which games and what they rated them. That would probably bring the trolling of said games to a minimum.

If RolStoppable is right and you have to add a game to your collection to rate it, then you can look at the profile of a person you suspect is a troll.

That would be good fun.



Play4Fun on 02 November 2011
gamelover2000 said:
Play4Fun said:
People who make a big deal out of game reviews and Metacritic scores are pathetic.

Yes, that's right...pathetic.

People might like predicting scores on metacritic... I don't really care for them either but you could atleast respect what other people like...

 

People who call other people pathetic are pathetic..

 

yes, that's right...pathetic.


No.

After seeing the reaction over UC3's 8/10 score, I cannot respect these people.

And watch yourself boy. Learn how to answer to my posts in a proper manner.

I am not someone to play with.

>=[



yo_john117 on 02 November 2011
brendude13 said:
yo_john117 said:
RolStoppable said:
kowenicki said:

I wasnt complaining about it... i just thought it would be funny if there was a retrospective release of names against scores for games on this site..... I'd quite like to see which users gave certain games 0/10.  Could ruin some peoples rep over night, great sport and lots of fun.   

From that point of view it would be funny indeed.

The thing is that games need to be added to one's collection in order to rate them, but unfortunately there's no way to display the users who have rated a game in a comfortable way. You would need to go through the profiles of suspects to see what score they gave Forza 4, but good luck finding those approximately 50 people who have added Forza 4 to their collection and rated it.

It would be nice if Vgchartz showed which users had which games and what they rated them. That would probably bring the trolling of said games to a minimum.

If RolStoppable is right and you have to add a game to your collection to rate it, then you can look at the profile of a person you suspect is a troll.

That would be good fun.

Yeah but it's too much work to go and look at every suspects profile.

But I can think of 2 people right away that would do something like that Aldro and goforgold. I think I'll go check now and see what I find.