It's getting some sub 90 scores. Does that mean we're going to die now?

I can't freaking wait!

AHHHHHHH

- Teheee, double post.

I'm honestly appaled by the reviewer's taste in the good stuff in life, if they dare give it below a nine. Do they hate puppie and biebes, too? Hmmmm? Hmmm?

GAH! MY COMPUTER IS DYING!!!!

I'll be back to finish updating in a couple hours guys!

AHHHHHHH!

Yes! I’ve already died a little

Key note of Metacritic is:
Usually, if a sequel scores 2-4 points lower than its predecessor, USUALLY, its the better game.

The recent Gears, LBP, Uncharted, Forza and so on all are a display of that.

Really impressive scores nonetheless from Zelda as expected!

True. But these are Zelda games! Even if it is better, if the MEtascore is below 95 then we're doomed!

92-93 is too low. It's a 95 ATM with the 2 80 scores and the 85, and 83. I expect DToid to give it 10/10, the Nintendo sites will, and a couple other will give it no less than 95. 

I say 95-98 still. That hasn't changed.

EDIT- What the guy above me said. Galaxy 2 is vastly better than Galaxy, yet has the same score. And it's a Wii game, and I know that reviewers don't admit it, but they do score lower (look at comments on most of the reviews and see the hate because of the graphics, let's say.) And the actual review is most important. 

Stop beating yourself up, guys.

Where do you reckon this game will end up on Metacritic then? 

Also- Agreed. Hoepfully MK7 can make up for that

Eh he he he...yeah...

true!!

and IGN reviews are usually reliable, so i guess Skyward Sword is really an amazing game