By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony Discussion - PS3 Has “Tight memory, Poor IO Performance” – John Carmack

Jazz2K on 16 October 2011

If there's one thing to learn from this generation is that no matter the knowledge you have on whatever subject you're talking about, don't say Sony hardware isn't on par or better than the competition because whatever you know will be irrelevant.



Around the Network
ZaneWane on 16 October 2011
x_DMX_x said:
NotStan said:
x_DMX_x said:
Yup im totally going to believe this guy.This coming from the guy who claimed that "the PS3 verison of the game was easy to develop because of blu-ray platform it will be one of the dominant versions"Now he does this.Not only that but Microsoft pays developers to have muliplat games look better on 360.So this is the biggest bullshit ive heard since Wii HD.


BAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHHAHAHAAHhahhahahahaha

Ok you laugh but, can you answer this question?

Why does Killzone 3 look better than any Xbox360 game and why cant any Multiplat game look as good as Killzone 3.

Ive seen comparisons on youtube with Killzone vs Crysis and Killzone looks better.

So can you answer my question?

Ign and many like it say diffrent



brendude13 on 16 October 2011
Booh! said:


No. He was requested to let us know if he could improve the game performance on ps3 or not. He was clearly pissed off and gave this harsh answer, that sounds a lot like an excuse. Q. : "Be professional and speak clearly: can you do something better?" A.: "The hardware is shit, it's not my fault".

It's an excuse. He could have simply answered that he had not enough experience on that kind of hardware, that he had not enough time to optimize the performances, that he miscalculated the tasks for those hardware capabilities. But saying that is just an excuse, 8Gb is not the largest install, and RAM is not that tight (it's even on a double bus, a feature that common pcs have not)...

This is basically what I was trying to get at, but you explained it better.



brendude13 on 16 October 2011
ZaneWane said:
x_DMX_x said:

Ok you laugh but, can you answer this question?

Why does Killzone 3 look better than any Xbox360 game and why cant any Multiplat game look as good as Killzone 3.

Ive seen comparisons on youtube with Killzone vs Crysis and Killzone looks better.

So can you answer my question?

Ign and many like it say diffrent

Well done x_DMX_x

You got this guy started on Crysis again >.<



yo_john117 on 16 October 2011
kowenicki said:
developer slags off MS or 360 - gospel, the truth, undeniable fact.

developer slags off Sony or PS3 - idiot, cant program, fanboy developer in ms pocket.

This is pretty much how it is too sadly enough.

 

Who should we trust more the average random off the internet that doesn't develop games or a developing master?

Obviously the internet random if we go by this thread. Christ get a grip guys, He knows what he is talking about, most of you guys don't have a clue.



Around the Network
Kynes on 16 October 2011

I'm sure most here don't even know how to do a hello world in C.



x_DMX_x on 16 October 2011
NotStan said:
x_DMX_x said:
NotStan said:
x_DMX_x said:
Yup im totally going to believe this guy.This coming from the guy who claimed that "the PS3 verison of the game was easy to develop because of blu-ray platform it will be one of the dominant versions"Now he does this.Not only that but Microsoft pays developers to have muliplat games look better on 360.So this is the biggest bullshit ive heard since Wii HD.


BAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHHAHAHAAHhahhahahahaha

Ok you laugh but, can you answer this question?

Why does Killzone 3 look better than any Xbox360 game and why cant any Multiplat game look as good as Killzone 3.

Ive seen comparisons on youtube with Killzone vs Crysis and Killzone looks better.

So can you answer my question?

You obviously have no frigging clue and just slinging mud around, I am actually genuinely surprised you haven't been banned yet, 90 posts, that's probably the longest one of you have lasted with such an attitude.

"Games look better on multiplatform, so Microsoft bribe all developers! It's a conspiracy man!"

Get your tinfoil hat on, I think microsoft might be using their satellites to look into your brain and steal ideas for 1st party games.

Rofl...and whos to say M$ doesnt pay off developers?You dont know that.You dont work for them.

i dont know that either but, ive seen alot of legit articles saying they do.



x_DMX_x on 16 October 2011
yo_john117 said:
kowenicki said:
developer slags off MS or 360 - gospel, the truth, undeniable fact.

developer slags off Sony or PS3 - idiot, cant program, fanboy developer in ms pocket.

This is pretty much how it is too sadly enough.

 

Who should we trust more the average random off the internet that doesn't develop games or a developing master?

Obviously the internet random if we go by this thread. Christ get a grip guys, He knows what he is talking about, most of you guys don't have a clue.

You actually do have a point though.



youarebadatgames on 16 October 2011

60 fps responsive gameplay > 30 fps laggy shitty gameplay



x_DMX_x on 16 October 2011
ZaneWane said:
x_DMX_x said:
NotStan said:
x_DMX_x said:
Yup im totally going to believe this guy.This coming from the guy who claimed that "the PS3 verison of the game was easy to develop because of blu-ray platform it will be one of the dominant versions"Now he does this.Not only that but Microsoft pays developers to have muliplat games look better on 360.So this is the biggest bullshit ive heard since Wii HD.


BAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHHAHAHAAHhahhahahahaha

Ok you laugh but, can you answer this question?

Why does Killzone 3 look better than any Xbox360 game and why cant any Multiplat game look as good as Killzone 3.

Ive seen comparisons on youtube with Killzone vs Crysis and Killzone looks better.

So can you answer my question?

Ign and many like it say diffrent

The fact that IGN is your reliable source for Graphics/Gaming or w/e you use them for makes me laugh.Any real gamer knows IGN is a joke LOL.