Quantcast
Its Over. Battlefied 3 is the new console king for graphics.

Forums - Microsoft Discussion - Its Over. Battlefied 3 is the new console king for graphics.

brendude13 said:
dahuman said:

Well, since this thread is so derailed, I might as well kill it.

Yeah, haha, so true. Those morons have to play Red Dead Redemption and Final Fantasy XIII in only 720p...Pahahaha

...Oh wait.

I quit Red Dead at Mexico, and FF 13 doesn't deserve the FF name, not to mention that they had 2 inconsistant versions across platforms(wtf was that 360 port SE?) and did a terrible fucking job with the open world aspect, I'd know, I have the NA copy and the Asian copy, funny thing is both copies have the same trophies so I was like wtf, if I paid for 2 copies from different regions, why the hell do I only have "1" set of trophies, those fuckers, so yeah, console gaming is annoying, constantly suffering from performance problems, storage limitation, and ability to use only 1-2 types of controls. My solution is all gamers should be rich so we don't have to deal with FF13's BS 20 FPS up close shots to Lighting's face. Xenoblade is another example of consoloe limitations, I get 3 saves...................... yep, 3, it's such a good game, better than all JRPGs from this gen, and I get 3 fucking saves, so I can't go back to all the parts I want to.

 

PS: have you seen those fingers in FF13? they are atrocious, how the hell can you have such nice looking models with concrete block fingers? my fucking god that annoyed the crap out of me.



Around the Network
brendude13 said:
dahuman said:

Well, since this thread is so derailed, I might as well kill it.

Yeah, haha, so true. Those morons have to play Red Dead Redemption and Final Fantasy XIII in only 720p...Pahahaha

...Oh wait.

I far prefer PC exclusives to those two games at least! Not to mention BF3 which will be much better on PC. Skyrim, Witcher 2, Starcraft 2, Diablo 3 etc. etc. *Crysis suit voice* Trolling engaged. Nah, but seriously, it's pretty funny to see console only gamers talking about graphics while they could have much much better ones on the PC.



pezus said:
brendude13 said:
dahuman said:

Well, since this thread is so derailed, I might as well kill it.

Yeah, haha, so true. Those morons have to play Red Dead Redemption and Final Fantasy XIII in only 720p...Pahahaha

...Oh wait.

I far prefer PC exclusives to those two games at least! Not to mention BF3 which will be much better on PC. Skyrim, Witcher 2, Starcraft 2, Diablo 3 etc. etc. *Crysis suit voice* Trolling engaged. Nah, but seriously, it's pretty funny to see console only gamers talking about graphics while they could have much much better ones on the PC.

Don't worry, I didn't mean it seriously.

It's just there are so many games, both exclusive and multiplatform, that never find their way to PC and usually end up being crowned game of the year. AAA PC exclusives are very rare these days, I don't see how people can justify throwing them all away for 1080p graphics.

I still prefer to play on consoles with or without the games too, I would rather sit at a distance and play it on a big TV, consoles ensure that the games are also optimised, consistent and run equally for everyone. The other guy mentioned performance, I prefer locked 30fps to 40-50fps, my HD 5770 can run Crysis but it can't run most games at 60fps for some irritating reason, it always sits at 40-50fps, the erratic performance is more distracting than locked 30fps. Battlefield Bad Company always says it is running at 45fps but for some reason it looks like 20fps.

So yeah, that wasn't a dig at PC gaming, it's just my history with PC gaming isn't very good at all.



selnor said:
Ajescent said:
selnor said:
Jay520 said:
selnor said:
Jay520 said:
Alright, this is the last time I'll ever visit a Selnor thread...

...I really mean it this time

Ive had a great chuckle to myself reading some of these posts.

Some of you are so serious here. Others are sending me fanmail. Honestly,  if you could see me laughing right now, you would laugh with me get dimebag and chillout and play games.

The world has enough tenseness and stress. These forums are fun. Thats all they are. 

Join me on the darkside and have a lil bit of fun. 

What you say. 

Oh my God. Another Selnor Graphics thread. 

Admit it, you couldnt help but enter to see what was going on could you. 

And you wont be able to resist next time. You may not post, but you will always look. ;)



You're right. I was lured in by the ridiculous posts that I knew would take place in this thread. Sure enough, I saw just that when I entered. I've read the entire thread and I must admit I laughed a few times, but my main feeling was dissapointment. Dissapointment in how crazy people can get. This happens in all your threads.

That's why I shall never visit another one of your threads EVER again. To avoid any further dissapointment

Wait, so you admit, you create threads based on obvious absurdity & then sit back and watch as people debate over the most meaningless topics? Well played sir. Input minimum effort & watch as the people go nuts.

Reminds me of Leo-J's thread claiming Uncharted 1 looks better than any X360 title ever. Of course, the whole foundation of the thread is absurd & OBVIOUSLY FALSE, yet Leo still managed to MAKE people search the web for pictures better than UNCHARTED 1. And when they did, he turned them down and MADE them search for more & more pics. He had them go on an endless search for evidence of something they already knew was true. All while Leo set back laughing at their futile efforts. Wow, Leo-J really IS a genious.

I think I'm gonna make a thread claiming Resistance 3 looks better than Gears 3 & watch as people go crazy.

No, scratch that, I'm gonna use RESISTANCE 2!

Not quite.

I didnt mean I create threads for any reason. 

I meant it hilarious that people get so uptight about a persons opinion. 

Thats all this is an opinion. 

Best thing is, I bet we would all actually sit down and play games to gether in real life. 

My opinion may or may not have people agreeing with it. 

But thats life. 

It just makes me laugh when people on an internet forum throw such animosity into an arguement when they most likely wouldnt do it to someones face or in fact wouldnt ever consider it without a keyboard. 

Waas really trying to say just relax and throw in your 2 cents. Thats all we really do on VGC is give our 2 cents. Some just think there 2 cents is worth more than someone elses 2 cents.

It's not that your opinion is wrong, it's just you seem to change it every other week that makes your opinions seem less creditable. As I said before, "it's only a matter of time before we see something else being crowned graphics king." That's what gets people's eyes rolling (mine at least) It's like you don't even bother to check if the visuals of the game you mark as graphics king are (un)beatable, Not so long ago, you were championing Crysis 2, now all of a sudden, that's old news, now "It's over" because BF3 is the new king, but knowing you; I doubt its reign will last till the end of the month let alone the end of the year.

If you made a thread and genuinely believe your claims then I would not be dismissive of you but if you make a claim and then less than a month later make a new claim completely disregarding your previous one(s), it makes your creditablity go to hell and no one will take you seriously.

Sure you do it for your own amusement or whatever, but if clearly you don't take your own words seriously, why should anyone else? I just take it as another thrilling installment of Graphidonia.

 

Without straying to far from the nest, the last time I made an outright graphics claim was Crysis 2. That was months ago. Before that it was ME2. Not really worthy of an every week tune. 

But hey. :)

In your defense, saying it's a weekly affair is pushing it too far but still, it is a little too frequent for it to be taken too seriously.



PS One/2/p/3slim/Vita owner. I survived the Apocalyps3/Collaps3 and all I got was this lousy signature.


Xbox One: What are you doing Dave?

brendude13 said:
pezus said:
brendude13 said:
dahuman said:

Well, since this thread is so derailed, I might as well kill it.

Yeah, haha, so true. Those morons have to play Red Dead Redemption and Final Fantasy XIII in only 720p...Pahahaha

...Oh wait.

I far prefer PC exclusives to those two games at least! Not to mention BF3 which will be much better on PC. Skyrim, Witcher 2, Starcraft 2, Diablo 3 etc. etc. *Crysis suit voice* Trolling engaged. Nah, but seriously, it's pretty funny to see console only gamers talking about graphics while they could have much much better ones on the PC.

Don't worry, I didn't mean it seriously.

It's just there are so many games, both exclusive and multiplatform, that never find their way to PC and usually end up being crowned game of the year. AAA PC exclusives are very rare these days, I don't see how people can justify throwing them all away for 1080p graphics.

I still prefer to play on consoles with or without the games too, I would rather sit at a distance and play it on a big TV, consoles ensure that the games are also optimised, consistent and run equally for everyone. The other guy mentioned performance, I prefer locked 30fps to 40-50fps, my HD 5770 can run Crysis but it can't run most games at 60fps for some irritating reason, it always sits at 40-50fps, the erratic performance is more distracting than locked 30fps. Battlefield Bad Company always says it is running at 45fps but for some reason it looks like 20fps.

So yeah, that wasn't a dig at PC gaming, it's just my history with PC gaming isn't very good at all.

You can lock your fps in most games by digging into the config file. Also, it's not ensured that you're getting an "optimized" version when you buy console versions of games. Examples: Black Ops (PS3), Bayonetta (PS3), FFXIII (360) etc. It's all much more customizable with PC's but I can see why someone would like the simplicity of consoles. PC exclusives are also probably more numerous these days than one might think.



Around the Network
brendude13 said:
pezus said:
brendude13 said:
dahuman said:

Well, since this thread is so derailed, I might as well kill it.

Yeah, haha, so true. Those morons have to play Red Dead Redemption and Final Fantasy XIII in only 720p...Pahahaha

...Oh wait.

I far prefer PC exclusives to those two games at least! Not to mention BF3 which will be much better on PC. Skyrim, Witcher 2, Starcraft 2, Diablo 3 etc. etc. *Crysis suit voice* Trolling engaged. Nah, but seriously, it's pretty funny to see console only gamers talking about graphics while they could have much much better ones on the PC.

Don't worry, I didn't mean it seriously.

It's just there are so many games, both exclusive and multiplatform, that never find their way to PC and usually end up being crowned game of the year. AAA PC exclusives are very rare these days, I don't see how people can justify throwing them all away for 1080p graphics.

I still prefer to play on consoles with or without the games too, I would rather sit at a distance and play it on a big TV, consoles ensure that the games are also optimised, consistent and run equally for everyone. The other guy mentioned performance, I prefer locked 30fps to 40-50fps, my HD 5770 can run Crysis but it can't run most games at 60fps for some irritating reason, it always sits at 40-50fps, the erratic performance is more distracting than locked 30fps. Battlefield Bad Company always says it is running at 45fps but for some reason it looks like 20fps.

So yeah, that wasn't a dig at PC gaming, it's just my history with PC gaming isn't very good at all.

PC migrated to online as a primary gaming solution years ahead of consoles, when people pick game of the year and all that shit, they usually pick ones with story included but the best competitive games are still on PC outside of fighting games. The whole Halo competition thing is seriously some baby shit compared to the competition on the PC front. Real PC gaming these days are played like sports and just like any other sport, equipment is important, the better your rig and tools, the more you can rip on top of it being fun as hell. Not to mention without PC tech advancing, consoles wouldn't get expotentially more powerful.

Your video card is too weak BTW, it's good enough for most WoW needs, but you can't max out most current games by a long shot, just make sure to run on the detail you can handle at full screen with v-sync on, anything under 60 FPS on PC is not acceptable. It's not that your games on PC are not optimized, it's your computer being too weak. Wireless is also not hard, nobody is forcing you to stay at the computer, my main screen is a Bravia 3DTV, I sit where I want. If you've got no money though....



pezus said:
brendude13 said:

Don't worry, I didn't mean it seriously.

It's just there are so many games, both exclusive and multiplatform, that never find their way to PC and usually end up being crowned game of the year. AAA PC exclusives are very rare these days, I don't see how people can justify throwing them all away for 1080p graphics.

I still prefer to play on consoles with or without the games too, I would rather sit at a distance and play it on a big TV, consoles ensure that the games are also optimised, consistent and run equally for everyone. The other guy mentioned performance, I prefer locked 30fps to 40-50fps, my HD 5770 can run Crysis but it can't run most games at 60fps for some irritating reason, it always sits at 40-50fps, the erratic performance is more distracting than locked 30fps. Battlefield Bad Company always says it is running at 45fps but for some reason it looks like 20fps.

So yeah, that wasn't a dig at PC gaming, it's just my history with PC gaming isn't very good at all.

You can lock your fps in most games by digging into the config file. Also, it's not ensured that you're getting an "optimized" version when you buy console versions of games. Examples: Black Ops (PS3), Bayonetta (PS3), FFXIII (360) etc. It's all much more customizable with PC's but I can see why someone would like the simplicity of consoles. PC exclusives are also probably more numerous these days than one might think.

I swear I've got OCD, so yes, simplicity is what I need.



ughhh. im sorry but this game is definately not console king for graphics. honestly its the graphics king on pc but on console its not even close. Im a bit disappointed in the graphics as well as gameplay. I was looking for more of battlefield bad company 2 but instead im getting more of a medal of honor vibe in it.



SpartenOmega117 said:
ughhh. im sorry but this game is definately not console king for graphics. honestly its the graphics king on pc but on console its not even close. Im a bit disappointed in the graphics as well as gameplay. I was looking for more of battlefield bad company 2 but instead im getting more of a medal of honor vibe in it.



Interms of still I think the game looks incredible, but it was running at like 15 fps for me with enough screen tearing for me to notice, how does it run on ps3 as I really think that lens of truth on the beta seemed full of it.

anyone have better framerates? as the second I was outside the subway tunnels I felt like I was it perfect dark on the 64 all over again, a game to technically advanced for the console



I HAVE A DOUBLE DRAGON CAB IN MY KITCHEN!!!!!!

NOW A PUNISHER CAB!!!!!!!!!!!!!