He meant that there no huge-scale battles like the one in R2.

still wrong since there's that huge spider mech boss battle according to IGN they even showed a bit of that level.....

when a reviewer says a game is 15 hours, it's 10 hours
when a reviewer says a game is 10 hours, it's 6-7 hours
when a reviewer says a game is 6 hour, it's 4 hours

Is there a way I can post my campaign stats or should I just take a pic and upload it?

I know you're trying to just show that you're right but you could easily just run past enemies and skip cutscenes (if even possible).

MGS4 that took me 15+ hours to do can be done on the hardest difficulty under 4 hours. So really, it depends how you played it.

Maybe make a "Lets Play Resistance 3" and have us see exactly how you did? Nah man im messing haha :P

http://www.gameinformer.com/games/resistance_3/b/ps3/archive/2011/09/06/review.aspx

don't click it! i warned you!

still waiting for g4. wht intrest me the most is the user post at the bottom. looks likethis game will get conflicting scores.

1 perfect so far so i'm 1 for 2. not bad. with ign and g4 its a buy. i would wait for gamespy but vgc review will be more interesting.

Are you sure about that? I was curious so I checked Metacritic and R3 has an 83 score after 22 reviews. KZ3 has an 84 score after 84 reviews. KZ3 had 10 total "mixed" reviews while R3 already has 5 of them. I think R3 will probably end up being lower than KZ3.

about the g4 review..morgan webb did it..she is an idiot and biased as hell against sony..I remember she saying something utterly retarded about the psv during E3 as well but luckily the other two guys she was with shut her dumb ass down