By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Jack Thompson Blames VA Shooting on Games

stof on 18 April 2007

Hus's gun arguments are sadder than his PS3 arguments. I'm just going to head out now. Later people.



I'm a mod, come to me if there's mod'n to do. 

Chrizum is the best thing to happen to the internet, Period.

Serves me right for challenging his sales predictions!

Bet with dsisister44: Red Steel 2 will sell 1 million within it's first 365 days of sales.

Around the Network
OriGin on 18 April 2007

Hus seems to be one of these people de-sensitized to violence by video games, talking about molotof cocktails and drive by bombings / terrorist type bombings propogated by Grand Theft Auto on the PS2.......

DUDE Hus man, you gotta read what it is that you're writing!

Guns make it easier and much more simple nothing more to argue about this is a video game forum not a gun forum.



Hus on 18 April 2007
OriGin said:
Hus seems to be one of these people de-sensitized to violence by video games, talking about molotof cocktails and drive by bombings / terrorist type bombings propogated by Grand Theft Auto on the PS2.......

DUDE Hus man, you gotta read what it is that you're writing!

Guns make it easier and much more simple nothing more to argue about this is a video game forum not a gun forum.

not de-sensitized... just realistic about the world.

iam aginast bans!!!

ban guns and some idiot kid takes a sword to class and cuts another kids head of..... they find out he has DMC game and a dmc poster. So obvios solution is ban the game.. then the specific genre.

ps - i never even owned GTA... alot od sensless violence, no point to it.



Hus on 18 April 2007
stof said:
 
Part of the reasoning behind it comes from the fact that pit bulls have been bred over the years specifically for aggression. Yes, a dog is more likely to be violent if it has a crappy owner. But evidence suggests that the effect is multiplied when it's a pit bull. Of course there's also evidence to suggest thats hogwash. It's still pretty early in the pitbull scientific debate realm.


 this type of MIS information is why those idiots baned pit bulls.

 Pits were bred for "Gameness" not just aggression, gameness is the drive to fight with out ever giving up.  Pits were bread to NEVER Ever bite a person, Any aggression towards people was NOT allowed.  A pit handler could separate two pits figthing without any risk of being bitten. 

 problem is moron trash breed them now and try to make them into a kiler guard dog rap wannbe thug BS! 

 



BenKenobi88 on 18 April 2007

I guess I don't really care about pit bulls...I don't really have a stance on their banning, it seems dumb, though I understand why people are going for it.  For me, I'm happy with my basset hounds.

 Seems like mainly NY and Canada are the big proposers with that whole thing...although I live like 15 minutes out of Chicago, so if they get banned in Chicago, they would probably get banned here too...I don't really care though.



LEFT4DEAD411.COM
Bet with disolitude: Left4Dead will have a higher Metacritic rating than Project Origin, 3 months after the second game's release.  (hasn't been 3 months but it looks like I won :-p )