Teo said:
4k1x3r said:
Teo said:
4k1x3r said:
Teo said:
RolStoppable said:
You might as well ask if gays are the better females. I would answer no to this question, so I also respond with a no to your question. |
Actually, gays are the better males.
|
.... If it was the case there would be no humans anymore...
|
What does human reproduction have to do with sexual supriority? Oh right, nothing. If only it was that easy to stop humans from reproducing, this earth is over populated and mostly with starving children. So, please stop and wear a condom next time. While heterosexuals have been busy making babies through time, gays have ruled the world (Kings), change the world (Davinci), progressed modern society (Buchanan, Lincoln, Hoover), and they now are in charge of the Arts and the Media, shaping the very self-image a straight man has of himself.
Yes, gay people own you my little duckling.
|
*laugh till his jaw drops*
I may appear like an anti-gay and i don't care (eventhough it's not the case) but when I read what you wrote, i can't help but laugh and then be sad that there are currently people in this world thinking the way you do. Pretty sad.
|
Says the duckling with faces of men all over his sig. Gay men > you.
|
Hahahaha what does sexual orientation and the fact that Cole McGrath and Hellghast are cool, there's no love involved there, and these are also the only good looking things you can chose (avatar and sig pic).
And do you know why I said that this makes me laugh and makes me sad at the same time? Because you cited a couple of people that were gay or said to have been gay, but do you know how much more people, who changed the world too, existed and weren't gays? Don't take particular cases and use them as some kind of generalities. Gays are still human, they're still "men", so they're no reason for them to be less intelligent than the rest of us. But saying that they are superior, that makes me laugh hard. You like men cool, but don't transform this in a kind of "race superiority" issue.
