So mutating baby boys at birth is fine, but an elective surgery by women is not fine?

You sir are always on fire. Hopefully you are a Sony fanboy or else this shall be my one and only praise, regardless of how my opinion is either relevant or not.

No. It's not fine. Not according to everyone here.

I don't honestly think "I wanna look like a 12-year old girl so pedos can screw me" is the intention, but if you look at porn you'll see most of those women have no pubic hairs, no visible inner labia, and their mons pubis (and their vaginas) tend to be rounded and smoothe.  This is the 'ideal' vulva as perpetuated by porn, therefore that's what girls want to look like. 

I assure you it's not to bait pedos. 

(1) Yes I do question it. The Medical ethics have some principles, but i will put just 4 in here:

Justice, Autonomy, "Primum non nocere" (non-maleficence or [firs do no harm]) and beneficence.

It means that we (Phisicians/Doctors) must try to avoid by all means to harm the patient, even with surgeries. (Usually a last resort: do harm[invade someones body] to avoid that something worst happens [death/sequelae/functional loss])

In case of plastic surgery, appeared the unneed functional surgeries, that do harm the body, but you are dealing with something more complicated, the restoration of self-confidence/self-image. AND EVEN IN THOSE CASES, the surgeons are not supposed to do things that will cause(or is very likely to cause) more harm than it should, by causing chronic pain, disfiguaration, etc

**(I'm considering the world here, not those freak chicks and those crazy american plastic surgeons, those boobs are hideous and UNHEALTHY)

(2) EXCUSE ME, but in which med school do you study? I'm pretty much sure that what I learned in the hospital showed the body structures that are likely to be harmed/destroyed in that specific surgery  and the  high risk of chronic pain due to that destruction. (Med students know because they actually study that stuff)

(3) Sincerely, I would need to be in the drugs and guns bussiness, instead of health care, to comment on ethics about those. Because every job/service/profession/etc TENDS to have its OWN ethics. And even among those who work with health, there are different ethic codes. (Phisicians ethics=/=Nurses ethics)

BUT, if you are talking about MY MORAL STANDARDS, I'm against cigarretes, alchool and guns.(Me going against the people who use those is another completely different subject)

You certainly seems to take out of you B*** my position/vision/politics about those topics. And in case you still haven't noticed, I did not touched on those subjects in my first post. (Not even remotely close, by the way)

(4) I don't know which degree of low sholarity you received to come up with such stupid assumptions, but you certainly need better reading and comprehension skills. If you are a writer, as your site avatar shows, is a SHAME those standard skills of yours. Contest something with your own knowledge/experience is one thing, doing the same WITHOUT knowledge and come up with things the other never said, is completely diferent.

*My position about make up* , I only date girls that I've already seen without make up(and after knowing their personality), because I'll will not operate them, since is UNETHICAL to do it on someone you have so closely/dearly. (Yes it is, try to read about medical ethics and hippocratic oath. I did and in my profession I will need to continue reading from times to times).

PLUS: Take care when trying to prove your point about SOMETHING  YOU DON'T KNOW SHIT, because the other guy may actually know very well the subject he is dealing with.

You can think that the whole word argue the same way internet teenagers, but, actually, there are some people with KNOWLEDGE about important things instead of just porn, games, gossip and freak stuff. (Which people are free to like, although I still think is weird guys enjoying gossip.....bus I'm not here to reprimand those )

Oh if it looks like porn videos then that's ok...I was under the impression that they were going for a 12 year old look.

One question though.....why silicon in the g-spot?

I can understand going "Brazilian" or going hairless in White Anglo Saxon Protestant (WASP) language, but cutting off the beef flaps is a big no no.

Porn stars have made careers over the same type of mutant genitalia these young females are spending thousands if not tens of thousands to surgically remove.

Kacey Jordan has "beef flaps" and I would love to have a woman whose vulva are as evolved as hers to hug and grip my little man to extreme pleasures.

Shame on these barbie doll, conformist dolls. God made you who you are. Accept it or accept being referred to as a fake, Las Vegas bimbo if you decide to go to unGodly depths to change your physical appearance.

I question the reason to WHY these women would want their vaginas to look like those women in the porn industry. I mean, pornstars are making a living through having sex/showing off their bodies to the camera, but ordinary women most likely aren't. What's the point of going through such a painful procedure when the only time you'll show off your vagina is when having sex, etc which isn't frequent? I understand if a woman wants to "tighten" her vagina maybe after giving birth because the woman doesn't feel the same amount of pleasure during sex due to her vagina being more open, but otherwise I think it's pretty disturbing to want to deal with the pain and the payment just to improve the aesthetic value of something that you rarely see/show-off. I know for a fact that most guys during sex don't give two shits about what the vagina looks like, because once your penis is in, the pleasure is all that matters.

I also find it disturbing that girls as young as 12 are asking to get this procedure. I think it is WRONG that we're promoting sex at such a young age (why else would a 12 year old want her vagina "shaped"?) I too agree with PSaiki in that I question the ethics of a surgeon who would do this.

Amen, brother.  It's all about the double standards.

Just to be clear, I agree with your illustration of the hipocracy of it all.

Just ban the performing of this on anyone too young to consent to the surgery (ie under 18) and then it turns into pretty much a non issue. If these women have the money to spend and value it enough then it's a free world.

As for wether it looks attractive, I agree that almost all guys do not care about how a vagina looks anywhere near as much as these women must care to spend $5k and experience a lot of pain.