scottie said: I am not debating that the net effect of the hacks was a negative one, I am saying that the hackers tried to have a positive effect and failed. |
first off here this should clear up any misunderstand on how this all started taken fromhttp://gamercrave.com/ps3-hacker-geohot-on-lost-linux-support-im-sorry/2349/ :
On Sunday, Sony announced that it the next Playstation 3 firmware update will cut off “Other OS” support, which allowed users to install Linux distributions on the console. Effective April 1, PS3 Linux users will have to back up their data and wave goodbye to the feature or avoid the update and sacrifice online play and other features. Sony has only pinned the change on “security concerns,” but hacker George “Geohot” Hotz, who released the first-ever PS3 hack earlier this year (preceded by several high-profile iPhone jailbreaks), which could ultimately allow piracy or other nefarious uses of the consoles, believes he played a role:
First off, I want to apologize to all the people who use Linux on their PS3. Before releasing, I weighed the pros and cons, and considered the possibility of an impact on OtherOS support. My logic was this. OtherOS support had already been removed from the Slim … The builders had apparently no intention of including it in future products. So for the purposes of openness why not release?
"I am saying that the hackers tried to have a positive effect"
ok lets go with this so they attack the network hoping to cost sony money... so you're saying that if hackers gain the ability to exploit the console through a secondary feature again later on that what happened will deter then from removing it? let me ask you something do you really believe that the money sony lost from the hack would have been more than if piracy had been allowed to happen through the exploit?