By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - 12 ideas for MW3 to keep up with BF3

goforgold on 07 May 2011
RaptorGTA said:
goforgold said:

lolz @ people still comparing these games, 

when COD gets HUGH maps, Massive vehicular warfare, a class system, and dedicated servers it would be about 10% comparable to any battlefield let alone BF3. That's got to be the worst thing this gen, COD players thinking they're getting a better, no no Compareable experience than Battlefield having no freaking clue as to what a battlefield game even is and no neither of the bad company spin offs count. 


Meh, Bad compan 2 was a good intro for players. Lets face it..the main thing in BF is team work. Which hopfully Bad company showed players to do.

 

As for for what can MW3 do? I think first of all they need to make a new engine. Their still using the COD2 engine..if they want to dream bigger like what Dice is doing your going to need an engine that can support it.

Killstreaks? Sorry..MW2 ruined them for me. Black ops made them a little more balanced..but really..i dont see anything else they can do thats going to put the wow fact back like the AC-130 did.

 

The callsigns and emblems? I never bothered with those..but the custom ones on Black ops I loved em. Much like Halo's one. I think if they go away from custom one then its a step backward in the series.

 

Add in a vehicle map? The COD might as well be BF or Homefront.

IMO, theres nothing MW3 can do for me to buy it. MW2 was the lowest COD game for me (took it back after a month).  Ill be buying BF3 for xbox and pc.

the amount of teamwork required to achieve success in Bad Company 2 would get you abosulty nowhere in any of the main line PC battlefields. Bad Company 1 was closer (it actually had a class system) but BC2 made sure to get rid of most of that games gameplay to appeal to casuals.

but sadly I do think BF3 will be more like BC2 than BF2.



Around the Network
im_sneaky on 07 May 2011
goforgold said:
RaptorGTA said:
goforgold said:

lolz @ people still comparing these games, 

when COD gets HUGH maps, Massive vehicular warfare, a class system, and dedicated servers it would be about 10% comparable to any battlefield let alone BF3. That's got to be the worst thing this gen, COD players thinking they're getting a better, no no Compareable experience than Battlefield having no freaking clue as to what a battlefield game even is and no neither of the bad company spin offs count. 


Meh, Bad compan 2 was a good intro for players. Lets face it..the main thing in BF is team work. Which hopfully Bad company showed players to do.

 

As for for what can MW3 do? I think first of all they need to make a new engine. Their still using the COD2 engine..if they want to dream bigger like what Dice is doing your going to need an engine that can support it.

Killstreaks? Sorry..MW2 ruined them for me. Black ops made them a little more balanced..but really..i dont see anything else they can do thats going to put the wow fact back like the AC-130 did.

 

The callsigns and emblems? I never bothered with those..but the custom ones on Black ops I loved em. Much like Halo's one. I think if they go away from custom one then its a step backward in the series.

 

Add in a vehicle map? The COD might as well be BF or Homefront.

IMO, theres nothing MW3 can do for me to buy it. MW2 was the lowest COD game for me (took it back after a month).  Ill be buying BF3 for xbox and pc.

the amount of teamwork required to achieve success in Bad Company 2 would get you abosulty nowhere in any of the main line PC battlefields. Bad Company 1 was closer (it actually had a class system) but BC2 made sure to get rid of most of that games gameplay to appeal to casuals.

but sadly I do think BF3 will be more like BC2 than BF2.


Good thing about that is that BF2 infantry combat was shit.... BC2 improved on it tremendously. But yeah, they are making it more BC2ish, which is odd, because BC is sort of a mix of BF and COD in the first place.



 

 

Gojimaster on 08 May 2011
goforgold said:

lolz @ people still comparing these games, 

when COD gets HUGH maps, Massive vehicular warfare, a class system, and dedicated servers it would be about 10% comparable to any battlefield let alone BF3. That's got to be the worst thing this gen, COD players thinking they're getting a better, no no Compareable experience than Battlefield having no freaking clue as to what a battlefield game even is and no neither of the bad company spin offs count. 


quit your act.  CoD is what it is because it doesn't have huge maps and vehicular warfare



 

Most anticipated games of 2011:

Uncharted 3,Legend of Zelda: Skyward Sword, Rocksmith

Modern Warfare 3, Super Mario 3D

 

ethomaz on 08 May 2011

Sorry but until today I never saw a BF better CoD.

So MW3 will kick ass easy... like every one done.

Better idea is make 10 point to BF3 destone MW3 because that is the reality.



Gojimaster on 08 May 2011
goforgold said:
RaptorGTA said:
goforgold said:

lolz @ people still comparing these games, 

when COD gets HUGH maps, Massive vehicular warfare, a class system, and dedicated servers it would be about 10% comparable to any battlefield let alone BF3. That's got to be the worst thing this gen, COD players thinking they're getting a better, no no Compareable experience than Battlefield having no freaking clue as to what a battlefield game even is and no neither of the bad company spin offs count. 


Meh, Bad compan 2 was a good intro for players. Lets face it..the main thing in BF is team work. Which hopfully Bad company showed players to do.

 

As for for what can MW3 do? I think first of all they need to make a new engine. Their still using the COD2 engine..if they want to dream bigger like what Dice is doing your going to need an engine that can support it.

Killstreaks? Sorry..MW2 ruined them for me. Black ops made them a little more balanced..but really..i dont see anything else they can do thats going to put the wow fact back like the AC-130 did.

 

The callsigns and emblems? I never bothered with those..but the custom ones on Black ops I loved em. Much like Halo's one. I think if they go away from custom one then its a step backward in the series.

 

Add in a vehicle map? The COD might as well be BF or Homefront.

IMO, theres nothing MW3 can do for me to buy it. MW2 was the lowest COD game for me (took it back after a month).  Ill be buying BF3 for xbox and pc.

the amount of teamwork required to achieve success in Bad Company 2 would get you abosulty nowhere in any of the main line PC battlefields. Bad Company 1 was closer (it actually had a class system) but BC2 made sure to get rid of most of that games gameplay to appeal to casuals.

but sadly I do think BF3 will be more like BC2 than BF2.


BC2 fanboys talk about what a 'team game' BC2 is.  But that is not very true in reality.  Most people online still tried to play BC2 like it was a single-player game.  In fact, the teamwork involved was often minimal.  BF2 had many more team options, but I am not sure most console gamers would be able to handle them.



 

Most anticipated games of 2011:

Uncharted 3,Legend of Zelda: Skyward Sword, Rocksmith

Modern Warfare 3, Super Mario 3D

 

Around the Network
Gojimaster on 08 May 2011
chocoloco said:

I hate the earned emblems because it only lead to boosting which is way down in Black Ops making it much more superior in my eyes than mw2. Nuke boosting was out of control and camping partly due to people trying to get emblems.

I also think vehicles were the worst part about World at war so I would throw that out too.

Your other ideas are okay, but I don't have many complaints about Black Ops it is great I love the funny ass emblems dirty or just cool.

I wouldn't worry though they change up something a little for every game, but I think there is not much to improve on.

Edit: Cod will rock battlefield in sale all the whiners can just keep on whining.

I imagine they won't be able to do custom emblems anymore.  The 360 userbase showed that they are not mature enough to handle them properly.  I was very disappointed in all the racist emblems especially-- I doubt Activision will go down the road of custom emblems again.

Emblem boosters can largely be taken care of if they eliminate the tactical insertion perk in free-for-all like they did in Black Ops. 



 

Most anticipated games of 2011:

Uncharted 3,Legend of Zelda: Skyward Sword, Rocksmith

Modern Warfare 3, Super Mario 3D

 

goforgold on 08 May 2011
Gojimaster said:
goforgold said:

lolz @ people still comparing these games, 

when COD gets HUGH maps, Massive vehicular warfare, a class system, and dedicated servers it would be about 10% comparable to any battlefield let alone BF3. That's got to be the worst thing this gen, COD players thinking they're getting a better, no no Compareable experience than Battlefield having no freaking clue as to what a battlefield game even is and no neither of the bad company spin offs count. 


quit your act.  CoD is what it is because it doesn't have huge maps and vehicular warfare

you say: that

and then I say: DUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUHHHHHHHHH

did you even read my post??? nothing aout COD is compareale to Battlefield in any way at all so this whole thread is bogus. top 10 ways COD can keep up battlefield as if it was EVER on the same level EVER!!! in any point in time, that's something this retarded ass indusrty need to figure the hell out you and me are clearly on the same page

it's like comepareing Gran Turismo to fucking Mario Kart, (which oddly enough I've seen on this forum much to my MASSIVE facepalm)



goforgold on 08 May 2011
ethomaz said:

Sorry but until today I never saw a BF better CoD.

So MW3 will kick ass easy... like every one done.

Better idea is make 10 point to BF3 destone MW3 because that is the reality.

name one .....just ONE COD that is in any ....ANY!!! way similar to Battlefield???????

you like COD because it's NOT battlefield......not becasue it's better facepalm



goforgold on 08 May 2011
im_sneaky said:
goforgold said:
RaptorGTA said:
goforgold said:

lolz @ people still comparing these games, 

when COD gets HUGH maps, Massive vehicular warfare, a class system, and dedicated servers it would be about 10% comparable to any battlefield let alone BF3. That's got to be the worst thing this gen, COD players thinking they're getting a better, no no Compareable experience than Battlefield having no freaking clue as to what a battlefield game even is and no neither of the bad company spin offs count. 


Meh, Bad compan 2 was a good intro for players. Lets face it..the main thing in BF is team work. Which hopfully Bad company showed players to do.

 

As for for what can MW3 do? I think first of all they need to make a new engine. Their still using the COD2 engine..if they want to dream bigger like what Dice is doing your going to need an engine that can support it.

Killstreaks? Sorry..MW2 ruined them for me. Black ops made them a little more balanced..but really..i dont see anything else they can do thats going to put the wow fact back like the AC-130 did.

 

The callsigns and emblems? I never bothered with those..but the custom ones on Black ops I loved em. Much like Halo's one. I think if they go away from custom one then its a step backward in the series.

 

Add in a vehicle map? The COD might as well be BF or Homefront.

IMO, theres nothing MW3 can do for me to buy it. MW2 was the lowest COD game for me (took it back after a month).  Ill be buying BF3 for xbox and pc.

the amount of teamwork required to achieve success in Bad Company 2 would get you abosulty nowhere in any of the main line PC battlefields. Bad Company 1 was closer (it actually had a class system) but BC2 made sure to get rid of most of that games gameplay to appeal to casuals.

but sadly I do think BF3 will be more like BC2 than BF2.


Good thing about that is that BF2 infantry combat was shit.... BC2 improved on it tremendously. But yeah, they are making it more BC2ish, which is odd, because BC is sort of a mix of BF and COD in the first place.

I agree with teh bold.

it's easy to have a more infintry based gameplay when next to NON to the damn maps support Vehicles, 90 percent of BC2 maps funnels vehicles down such tight bottle necks it made using the vehicles damn near useless



goforgold on 08 May 2011
Gojimaster said:
goforgold said:
RaptorGTA said:
goforgold said:

lolz @ people still comparing these games, 

when COD gets HUGH maps, Massive vehicular warfare, a class system, and dedicated servers it would be about 10% comparable to any battlefield let alone BF3. That's got to be the worst thing this gen, COD players thinking they're getting a better, no no Compareable experience than Battlefield having no freaking clue as to what a battlefield game even is and no neither of the bad company spin offs count. 


Meh, Bad compan 2 was a good intro for players. Lets face it..the main thing in BF is team work. Which hopfully Bad company showed players to do.

 

As for for what can MW3 do? I think first of all they need to make a new engine. Their still using the COD2 engine..if they want to dream bigger like what Dice is doing your going to need an engine that can support it.

Killstreaks? Sorry..MW2 ruined them for me. Black ops made them a little more balanced..but really..i dont see anything else they can do thats going to put the wow fact back like the AC-130 did.

 

The callsigns and emblems? I never bothered with those..but the custom ones on Black ops I loved em. Much like Halo's one. I think if they go away from custom one then its a step backward in the series.

 

Add in a vehicle map? The COD might as well be BF or Homefront.

IMO, theres nothing MW3 can do for me to buy it. MW2 was the lowest COD game for me (took it back after a month).  Ill be buying BF3 for xbox and pc.

the amount of teamwork required to achieve success in Bad Company 2 would get you abosulty nowhere in any of the main line PC battlefields. Bad Company 1 was closer (it actually had a class system) but BC2 made sure to get rid of most of that games gameplay to appeal to casuals.

but sadly I do think BF3 will be more like BC2 than BF2.


BC2 fanboys talk about what a 'team game' BC2 is.  But that is not very true in reality.  Most people online still tried to play BC2 like it was a single-player game.  In fact, the teamwork involved was often minimal.  BF2 had many more team options, but I am not sure most console gamers would be able to handle them

the sad truth my friend, but Consoles did try atleast, MAG is a real good example but sadly console gamers didn't think much of it proving your point.