By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - PC Discussion - Snesboy finally has a real computer.

NJ5 said:

The HD 5750 is a fine GPU if you don't want to run games at very high resolutions.

Just out of curiousity, how does that compare to the 4650...because a 1gb 4650 works perfectly fine on medium-high settings on games with a 1920x1080 resolution.  I know this isn't extreme graphics or anything, but some of you are acting like it is only a half ass card, when that isn't true at all.



Money can't buy happiness. Just video games, which make me happy.

Around the Network
Baalzamon said:
NJ5 said:

The HD 5750 is a fine GPU if you don't want to run games at very high resolutions.

Just out of curiousity, how does that compare to the 4650...because a 1gb 4650 works perfectly fine on medium-high settings on games with a 1920x1080 resolution.  I know this isn't extreme graphics or anything, but some of you are acting like it is only a half ass card, when that isn't true at all.


Tomshardware regularly publishes a list of GPUs sorted by how powerful they are, that's a very good way to answer most of these questions.

Here is the April 2011 list:

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-graphics-card-radeon-hd-6990-geforce-gtx-590,2912-7.html

The list says, "I don’t recommend upgrading your graphics card unless the replacement card is at least three tiers higher."

By this standard, the HD 5750 is significantly more powerful than the 4650, being six tiers higher.



My Mario Kart Wii friend code: 2707-1866-0957

NJ5 said:
Baalzamon said:
NJ5 said:

The HD 5750 is a fine GPU if you don't want to run games at very high resolutions.

Just out of curiousity, how does that compare to the 4650...because a 1gb 4650 works perfectly fine on medium-high settings on games with a 1920x1080 resolution.  I know this isn't extreme graphics or anything, but some of you are acting like it is only a half ass card, when that isn't true at all.


Tomshardware regularly publishes a list of GPUs sorted by how powerful they are, that's a very good way to answer most of these questions.

Here is the April 2011 list:

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-graphics-card-radeon-hd-6990-geforce-gtx-590,2912-7.html

The list says, "I don’t recommend upgrading your graphics card unless the replacement card is at least three tiers higher."

By this standard, the HD 5750 is significantly more powerful than the 4650, being six tiers higher.

Oh, wow.  I would consider that a pretty good graphics card then, whether or not it is top of the line.



Money can't buy happiness. Just video games, which make me happy.

Snesboy said:
Antabus said:

2.6ghz and 5750 =/= real computer.

If you weren't such a troll, I might believe you. But what should I expect from someone that buys 3rd party videogame controllers? And a Radeon HD 5750 is a great graphics card, especially with a gig of dedicated memory. So until you actually have a well thought out post to share with us, I kindly ask you to be quiet.

What an ass.

Anyway great computer! I plan on getting a new one this fall but i can't decide on a quad core Phenom II or Athlon II. What do you recommend? Also, is the X6 worth it over X4?



e=mc^2

Gaming on: PS4 Pro, Switch, SNES Mini, Wii U, PC (i5-7400, GTX 1060)

Snesboy said:
Antabus said:

2.6ghz and 5750 =/= real computer.

If you weren't such a troll, I might believe you. But what should I expect from someone that buys 3rd party videogame controllers? And a Radeon HD 5750 is a great graphics card, especially with a gig of dedicated memory. So until you actually have a well thought out post to share with us, I kindly ask you to be quiet.

I see that you are willing to accept not so well thought posts if they are positive about your purchase.

2.6hgz processor is slow for games and you don't need 6 cores for virtually any games now and for a long time.

5750 is not a good gpu. With 1440x900 resolution, you won't get any advantage over the 512mb model. For higher resolutions, 5750 is way too slow. Even with 1440x900, you will not get 75(your likely refresh rate?) fps for any modern games.

Also you paid waaaayyy too much for that package. I think you just bought a prebuild acer or something.

 

You could have had a 3.5ghz quad core, 8gb 1333mhz ram, 2tb HDD, GF 560ti  and a good case/power ( oem W7 home)  for the money you spent on that.



Around the Network
Solid-Stark said:
Snesboy said:
Antabus said:

2.6ghz and 5750 =/= real computer.

If you weren't such a troll, I might believe you. But what should I expect from someone that buys 3rd party videogame controllers? And a Radeon HD 5750 is a great graphics card, especially with a gig of dedicated memory. So until you actually have a well thought out post to share with us, I kindly ask you to be quiet.

What an ass.

Anyway great computer! I plan on getting a new one this fall but i can't decide on a quad core Phenom II or Athlon II. What do you recommend? Also, is the X6 worth it over X4?

If the clock speed is the same, the processor is the same for you (gamer, normal user). For some benchmarks and "serious" purposes, there is a difference.



V-r0cK said:
Snesboy said:
V-r0cK said:
 

May i kno the cost of this new beast of yours?

706.91 USD including shipping.

Thats hell of a good deal. =P

No, it is not.



Antabus said:
Snesboy said:
Antabus said:

2.6ghz and 5750 =/= real computer.

If you weren't such a troll, I might believe you. But what should I expect from someone that buys 3rd party videogame controllers? And a Radeon HD 5750 is a great graphics card, especially with a gig of dedicated memory. So until you actually have a well thought out post to share with us, I kindly ask you to be quiet.

I see that you are willing to accept not so well thought posts if they are positive about your purchase.

2.6hgz processor is slow for games and you don't need 6 cores for virtually any games now and for a long time.

5750 is not a good gpu. With 1440x900 resolution, you won't get any advantage over the 512mb model. For higher resolutions, 5750 is way too slow. Even with 1440x900, you will not get 75(your likely refresh rate?) fps for any modern games.

Also you paid waaaayyy too much for that package. I think you just bought a prebuild acer or something.

 

You could have had a 3.5ghz quad core, 8gb 1333mhz ram, 2tb HDD, GF 560ti  and a good case/power ( oem W7 home)  for the money you spent on that.

Where exactly are you getting he can get all that for $700?  For solely the cpu, ram, hard drive, gpu, and windows 7 on newegg is $730 already if you were to build the computer, which is generally cheaper.  You then still have to buy the mobo, power supply, case, and any other necessary supplies for making a computer.

----------------

Also, completely unrelated, but since you know about computers (or seem to), is there a way to tell if/when turbo boost is activated on my i7 on my laptop?



Money can't buy happiness. Just video games, which make me happy.

Antabus said:
Snesboy said:
Antabus said:

2.6ghz and 5750 =/= real computer.

If you weren't such a troll, I might believe you. But what should I expect from someone that buys 3rd party videogame controllers? And a Radeon HD 5750 is a great graphics card, especially with a gig of dedicated memory. So until you actually have a well thought out post to share with us, I kindly ask you to be quiet.

I see that you are willing to accept not so well thought posts if they are positive about your purchase.

2.6hgz processor is slow for games and you don't need 6 cores for virtually any games now and for a long time.

5750 is not a good gpu. With 1440x900 resolution, you won't get any advantage over the 512mb model. For higher resolutions, 5750 is way too slow. Even with 1440x900, you will not get 75(your likely refresh rate?) fps for any modern games.

Also you paid waaaayyy too much for that package. I think you just bought a prebuild acer or something.

 

You could have had a 3.5ghz quad core, 8gb 1333mhz ram, 2tb HDD, GF 560ti  and a good case/power ( oem W7 home)  for the money you spent on that.


He can easily overclock that CPU to ~3.4 ghz with an aftermarket air cooler. I have a 3.0 Phenom II running at 3.8 with even more headroom if needed. Besides its not like clockspeed is everything.

And that GPU is plenty for 1440x900 res, which is what most likely his monitor is capable of.

Also...75 fps? really? Is a game unplayable for you if it goes under 75fps?

Also...there is no way in hell one can get all that stuff you listed for 700 bucks. Unless you spend weeks looking for sales, bottom prices and special deals...



Antabus said:
Snesboy said:
Antabus said:

2.6ghz and 5750 =/= real computer.

If you weren't such a troll, I might believe you. But what should I expect from someone that buys 3rd party videogame controllers? And a Radeon HD 5750 is a great graphics card, especially with a gig of dedicated memory. So until you actually have a well thought out post to share with us, I kindly ask you to be quiet.

I see that you are willing to accept not so well thought posts if they are positive about your purchase.

2.6hgz processor is slow for games and you don't need 6 cores for virtually any games now and for a long time.

5750 is not a good gpu. With 1440x900 resolution, you won't get any advantage over the 512mb model. For higher resolutions, 5750 is way too slow. Even with 1440x900, you will not get 75(your likely refresh rate?) fps for any modern games.

Also you paid waaaayyy too much for that package. I think you just bought a prebuild acer or something.

 

You could have had a 3.5ghz quad core, 8gb 1333mhz ram, 2tb HDD, GF 560ti  and a good case/power ( oem W7 home)  for the money you spent on that.

The Phenom II X6 has turbo so he will in fact get 3.1 GHz for games which use three cores or less.

CPU is not the limiting factor in most games anyway...



My Mario Kart Wii friend code: 2707-1866-0957