wtf who still plays ps2 games!?!? get with the times people..
| kowenicki said: I like how the two features removed utterly obliterate the features you list as added (most of which should have been there at the outset)... cool. |
The two removed features listed are nothing to PS3 user like the majority of others added features.
OtherOS feature - If 10,000 PS3 users was using this feature I will be surprised.
PS3 B/C - Cool but userless... if you have PS2 games you have a PS2 too... and HD Collection is a better option for that.
But I agree that added features are useless too except the In Game XMB, Facebook/Twitter integration, Automatic download and Cloud saving.
OP. Anonymous really sucks... a bunch of spoiled that has nothing to do.
Absolutely correct. Do not pay attention to this group, as they do not deserve it. True fighters of justice and equality hold themselves to be just. Fighting random people without a cause is just foolish, ignorant, and immature. These "Warhawks" aren't going into battle and have the possiblity of dying an honorable death. A game. Where they can repeat the same procedure over again. This is not a war. It is a foolish attempt at getting what you want when you want it. Wait, didn't we all think with that exact same logic before? Oh thats right, when we were young and quite naive. No good can come from any of this. Mastercard didn't change their ways. Nor will the Westboro Baptist Church. And I'm certainly sure the same will apply to Sony. As for HBGreg, how much do you want to bet that their underhanded, scrupulous behavior is still continuing? I thought so.
We all must be held accountable for our actions. That is the way of the American Judicial System. With flaws, yes, but nothing is perfect.
Xen said:
Well, that's you and past models perhaps. Factually, the reliablity of the current 9000x model is top notch. Heck, my 39004 will be entering its 8th year in "service" this June, not a hitch so far. |
And this doesn't matter... he is doing what is right as a Consumer, choosing the best for him with his purchase not with hacking...
I would love (and wouldn't complain) if the people that felt damaged by remove other/OS just returned their PS3 and asked by refund (or just resell on internet), that is your consumer right... Thinking that you can do whatever you want isn't a right.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
| Th3Mist3rN3farious said: This is officially the worst researched thread I have ever had the misfortune to endure. Im not even a member of this site, nor do I own a PS3 and have registered purely to write a reply to this ridiculus outlook you appear to be labouring over. 1. I know plenty of people who used otherOS before it was removed. That fact that you didnt use it makes it your opinion that 'people are complaining over nothing', not a certifiable fact. What is a fact is that many people paid $800 as you so rightly quoted for a machine with 'otherOS' and were not offered any type of compensation when the feature was removed. Even so, this isnt the main reason for all this hurlyburly. 2. The main reason for the response from anonymous is that Geohot placed a video on youtube and on his own site showing his ps3 hack. Sony then filed civil case requesting that the IP address of ANYONE who viewed either the youtube video or the site be supoened FROM YOUTUBE and Geohots host. Thats ANYONE who may have stumbled upon the video or been redirected to it or anyother method innocent members of the public come across youtube videos. UNBELIEVABLY the court agreed ad thus over 10,000 IP addresses were passed over for further investigation. Thats a MASSIVE INVASION of peoples right to privacy online. Thats the reason for the anonymous involvement, nothing else. 3. You said 'anonymous' has done nothing of note other than DDoS'ing which anybody can do. How about when they broke into HBGary a $2 million governmental private security firm after it falsely claimed it had pentrated its members, releasing 60,000 emails outlining how the company was using illegal methods to obtain finances and information, a crime they are currently explaining under congressional commitee. How about when they broke into the Bank of America releasing emails outlining how it has been deleting account details from their systems for no reason after requests from external insurance agencies. The list goes on.....and on......and on..... I am not a member of anonymous, merely a sympathiser. I also sympathise with you guys because its the gamer who is getting the short end of the stick in all of this. The point however still remains that there is always going to be a 'geohot' trying to hack any electronic device released and the way to deal with this is not by using your corporate power to pull data on thousands of individuals from the internet, the vast majority of which have done absolutely nothing wrong. Who knows, you have a ps3, maybe you looked at the video out of curiosity and are now being investigated by sony . . . . . |
You are even less informed... PS3 costed 800 to make, they were never retailed at that price... they were 600... go troll elsewhere.
And constitution don't grant you a "freedom of speech online for anything"... you may have a freedom of speech independent than the Media, but you are also liable for what you say - and this is what Sony is trying there.
About the IP that would be invasion of privacy, but as Sony got it legally in court then no one can sue then or say they done anything illegal - no matter how much you don't like it - even more because the use is restrict to prove jurisdiction not hack your account - as some hackers would do (not all sure).
And about don't letting people see GeoHotz saying that isn't free of speech also, that is free acess to information (that isn't even a constitutional right)...
GeoHotz could curse Sony in 100 different languages and badmouth them on TV or newspaper and Sony couldn't - and probably wouldn't even try even more because they would gain publicity, maybe if they see harm to their pockets they may prosecute to compensation (and if GeoHotz were right about his complaint Sony that would need to pay legal expenses)... What he did isn't freedom of speech is breach of some laws.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
Did it occur to anyone that Anonymous doesn't exist, the way organizations exist normally? Has anyone thought the whole Anonymous thing is merely a banner people do stuff under, where they aren't identified? Like someone throws the whole "Anonymous 99" thing against the Federal Reserve and the banking system itself, and that is Anonymous. Someone else ends up telling Colbert to not mess with the name of the International Space Station and let Xenu get it. Other under the Anonymous banner ends up doing stuff, like going after Sony.
In one sense, it is a joke. In another sense, maybe it is an Internet consciousness that flows out of a set of values for freedom of information and to do what one wants, without powers that be become known. In short, think of it merely as a banner that a loose association of people with someone similar values operate under, without their identities out. Shoot, what prevents you, if you like Sony so much, from doing an Anonymous Love Sony spot and sticking it up on YouTube? Look at the decrees Anonymous was supposed to said at past, and you see there isn't any organized structure that will stop you.
So, there you go, say Anonymous Love Sony.
| deskpro2k3 said: wtf who still plays ps2 games!?!? get with the times people.. |
That, a thousand times over.
PS One/2/p/3slim/Vita owner. I survived the Apocalyps3/Collaps3 and all I got was this lousy signature.
Xbox One: What are you doing Dave?
Ajescent said:
|
Got it...
Well, I have my Capcom Collections volume 1 and 2 that have a ton of Capcom arcade stuff. Is it ok to have that? Is it? Also, shoot, the PS3 doesn't have some things I have for my PS2 stuff.
By the way, you that some games CAN be timeless. Not sure anyone who threw out their Go or Chess sets, just because a new console arrived. Maybe some thought can be given to stuff being timeless, rather than new.
richardhutnik said:
Got it... Well, I have my Capcom Collections volume 1 and 2 that have a ton of Capcom arcade stuff. Is it ok to have that? Is it? Also, shoot, the PS3 doesn't have some things I have for my PS2 stuff. |
Don't get me wrong, I still play some ps2 games but people go on about it as if it's the defining feature of the ps3...it shouldn't be because the ps3 is the defining feature of the ps3.
PS One/2/p/3slim/Vita owner. I survived the Apocalyps3/Collaps3 and all I got was this lousy signature.
Xbox One: What are you doing Dave?
| kowenicki said: I like how the two features removed utterly obliterate the features you list as added (most of which should have been there at the outset)... cool. |
Ilike how you think your opinion is a fact...
cool.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2024 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
