Quantcast
Crysis 2 Face-Off PS3 vs 360 [Digital Foundry]

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Crysis 2 Face-Off PS3 vs 360 [Digital Foundry]

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-crysis2-face-off

Couple of things, here.

No. 1, Richard agrees that Killzone 3 and Motorstorm Apocalypse are the best 3D games out there, even better than Crysis 2.

No. 2:

Both versions are supposedly the same, 360 seems to run at 1152x720. The PS3 version, however runs at 1024 x 720 but the differences are minor, due to blur effects.

The PS3 version seems to have better 3D effects from what I have read. I maybe wrong so you may want to check it out.

The PS3 version maintains its frame rate throughout the whole game even though its lower than the 360 version. The 360 version however has frame-rate going below 20 fps in some scenes. What this means is that the PS3 version operates more consistently then the 360 version, but the 360 version seems to hit 30 fps a lot more.

There is no screen tearing visible on either consoles.

Which is why he seemed to think that either versions are equally good.



Around the Network

720p on 360 version?really?



Okay so... They are equal? Yet reviews are saying that the PS3 version looks a lot inferior?



D-Joe said:

720p on 360 version?really?

He wrote it was native 720p so I thought maybe it wasn't sub HD. Also he only compared it to Halo Reach in terms of AA and not resolution so its probably full 720p.



The crucial thing is that both are phenomenally attractive games, producing effects quite different and in many ways more advanced than anything we've seen elsewhere on console. We all wanted Crysis on console to be an event, a showcase release: by and large, Crytek has delivered, and those cutting edge visuals are backed by a truly impressive game design.

 

Now can we all be happy together, hold hands and sings songs..



 

Face the future.. Gamecenter ID: nikkom_nl (oh no he didn't!!) 

Around the Network
NiKKoM said:

The crucial thing is that both are phenomenally attractive games, producing effects quite different and in many ways more advanced than anything we've seen elsewhere on console. We all wanted Crysis on console to be an event, a showcase release: by and large, Crytek has delivered, and those cutting edge visuals are backed by a truly impressive game design.

 

Now can we all be happy together, hold hands and sings songs..


If only more people thought like you.



So IGN was full of shit?

Graphics are not inferior on PS3 like mentioned and PS3 also holds a steadier frame rate and the 360 version is the one with the larger frame drops?

 

Ouch, talk about being exposed.



iPhone = Great gaming device. Don't agree? Who cares, because you're wrong.

Currently playing:

Final Fantasy VI (iOS), Final Fantasy: Record Keeper (iOS) & Dragon Quest V (iOS)     

    

Got a retro room? Post it here!

Jesus. I still can't decide. :'(



I also read that the PS3 has better texture filtering than the 360 version. Now, didn't IGN say that the PS3 version is worse with textures as well?



iPhone = Great gaming device. Don't agree? Who cares, because you're wrong.

Currently playing:

Final Fantasy VI (iOS), Final Fantasy: Record Keeper (iOS) & Dragon Quest V (iOS)     

    

Got a retro room? Post it here!

Euphoria14 said:

So IGN was full of shit?

Graphics are not inferior on PS3 like mentioned and PS3 also holds a steadier frame rate and the 360 version is the one with the larger frame drops?

 

Ouch, talk about being exposed.

overall for frame rate i think 360 is litte better

but i also thinking is this glitches?i mean,it's Crytek first console games

so maybe some patch can fix some in game glitches,for both consoles