Quantcast
IGN: Homefront Review

Forums - Gaming Discussion - IGN: Homefront Review

Chroniczaaa said:
ethomaz said:

LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL... kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk.

That's so funny.

1) IGN down your score system after GT5... all games (not just PS3) are receiving lower scores.
2) IGN has nothing against PS3... just lowered your score.
3) GT5 failure? LOL explain that for over 6 million satisfied users.
4) KZ3 failure? LOL one of the best multiplayer this gen.

LOL LOL LOL

Ill just support him for the heck of it... After I got to level 30 in GT5 the game downright sucked balls after that and wasn't really that fun in the first place come to think of it. Then I sold it to amazon for $37.50 as a simulator (sort of) it was good. As a game thats supposed to be fun to play it was bad.

So not all of those 6 million people who bought it enjoyed it. Ever heard of a trade-in?

He called it a failure (and by failure, he meant reviews). I'm not necessarily defending ethomaz's post here, but your bit was irrelevant.



                                                                                                                                            

Around the Network
CGI-Quality said:
Chroniczaaa said:
ethomaz said:
AppleHater said:
It started with Reach. All gaming sites started to review games harshly starting with Reach not GT5.  Fable 3 and Fallout new vegas all got low review scores and they came out before GT5.

I dont know why you ps3 fanboys think IGN has some sort of  vendetta agianst ps3 and its games ? Maybe you should stop and realize that maybe the games got the score they so rightfully deserve? Because honestly Killzone 3 and GT5 were failures ( please dont result in a ban for saying the truth).

They got the reviews they deserve and their meta scores are basically the exact same thing as IGN scores so IGN is not agianst you guys.

LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL... kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk.

That's so funny.

1) IGN down your score system after GT5... all games (not just PS3) are receiving lower scores.
2) IGN has nothing against PS3... just lowered your score.
3) GT5 failure? LOL explain that for over 6 million satisfied users.
4) KZ3 failure? LOL one of the best multiplayer this gen.

LOL LOL LOL

Ill just support him for the heck of it... After I got to level 30 in GT5 the game downright sucked balls after that and wasn't really that fun in the first place come to think of it. Then I sold it to amazon for $37.50 as a simulator (sort of) it was good. As a game thats supposed to be fun to play it was bad.

So not all of those 6 million people who bought it enjoyed it. Ever heard of a trade-in?

He called it a failure (and by failure, he meant reviews). Your bit was irrelevant.

That dude said that everyone who bought the game was satisfied with it and thats obviously not the case so i made little of a point but still a point.



"Defeating a sandwich, only makes it tastier." - Virginia

I don't care about IGN's reviews. I'll try this game during the weekend.



Try Gamefly for a month and get another one free!

http://gamefly.tellapal.com/a/clk/406vc

Chroniczaaa said:

That dude said that everyone who bought the game was satisfied with it and thats obviously not the case so i made little of a point but still a point.

You had to have been a good deal satisfied to have played to level 30.



                                                                                                                                            

CGI-Quality said:
Chroniczaaa said:

That dude said that everyone who bought the game was satisfied with it and thats obviously not the case so i made little of a point but still a point.

You had to have been a good deal satisfied to have played to level 30.


It was just average for a bit and then all the b-spec and a-spec grinding kind of drove me absolutely insane. especially redoing endurances just to level



"Defeating a sandwich, only makes it tastier." - Virginia

Around the Network

as expected

looked generic to me anyway, but it seems to have some bright spots that makes it worth a bargain ben purchase.

i'll be looking forward to vgc and vgc gamer reveiws.



Chroniczaaa said:
CGI-Quality said:
Chroniczaaa said:

That dude said that everyone who bought the game was satisfied with it and thats obviously not the case so i made little of a point but still a point.

You had to have been a good deal satisfied to have played to level 30.


It was just average for a bit and then all the b-spec and a-spec grinding kind of drove me absolutely insane. especially redoing endurances just to level


it was that bad?



CGI-Quality said:
Chroniczaaa said:
ethomaz said:

LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL... kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk.

That's so funny.

1) IGN down your score system after GT5... all games (not just PS3) are receiving lower scores.
2) IGN has nothing against PS3... just lowered your score.
3) GT5 failure? LOL explain that for over 6 million satisfied users.
4) KZ3 failure? LOL one of the best multiplayer this gen.

LOL LOL LOL

Ill just support him for the heck of it... After I got to level 30 in GT5 the game downright sucked balls after that and wasn't really that fun in the first place come to think of it. Then I sold it to amazon for $37.50 as a simulator (sort of) it was good. As a game thats supposed to be fun to play it was bad.

So not all of those 6 million people who bought it enjoyed it. Ever heard of a trade-in?

He called it a failure (and by failure, he meant reviews). I'm not necessarily defending ethomaz's post here, but your bit was irrelevant.

Well review wise GT5 is a fail, 84 on meta is pathetic for a game that took 5 years to make with so many high expectations. Also it got delayed so many times with the excuess from sony and PD that they are making the best racing game. Lets not forget the amount of GT fanboys who said it will easily blow Forza away.

Killzone 3.... that a touchy subject, sony defense force will be on the offense if i say anything bad about the goldy "halo killer"

Anyways I am the only one that finds it funny that he got banned even though he said he was trying not too! LOL



Thought the story looks pretty appealing but at the moment I saw the gameplay that was a big no no...  Way too much like COD and friends.



TimeToHateMe said:
CGI-Quality said:
Chroniczaaa said:
ethomaz said:

LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL... kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk.

That's so funny.

1) IGN down your score system after GT5... all games (not just PS3) are receiving lower scores.
2) IGN has nothing against PS3... just lowered your score.
3) GT5 failure? LOL explain that for over 6 million satisfied users.
4) KZ3 failure? LOL one of the best multiplayer this gen.

LOL LOL LOL

Ill just support him for the heck of it... After I got to level 30 in GT5 the game downright sucked balls after that and wasn't really that fun in the first place come to think of it. Then I sold it to amazon for $37.50 as a simulator (sort of) it was good. As a game thats supposed to be fun to play it was bad.

So not all of those 6 million people who bought it enjoyed it. Ever heard of a trade-in?

He called it a failure (and by failure, he meant reviews). I'm not necessarily defending ethomaz's post here, but your bit was irrelevant.

Well review wise GT5 is a fail, 84 on meta is pathetic for a game that took 5 years to make with so many high expectations. Also it got delayed so many times with the excuess from sony and PD that they are making the best racing game. Lets not forget the amount of GT fanboys who said it will easily blow Forza away.

Killzone 3.... that a touchy subject, sony defense force will be on the offense if i say anything bad about the goldy "halo killer"

Anyways I am the only one that finds it funny that he got banned even though he said he was trying not too! LOL

GT5 was delayed twice and an 84 Meta score isn't a "failing" score. Not sure how you measure quality, but I don't based soley on a number (that isn't bad to begin with).

As for AppleHater, he was banned because he broke the rules. Period.