The question was who has the best start. Obviously some posters in this thread are working off some twisted curve scale. One or two strong titles do not offset a heaping helping of shovel ware or delayed ports. I actually think the Wii falls third in line. Two rock solid titles do not cover enough territory to offset a whole lot of crap, or extremely niche titles.
The 360 and the PS3 share half a dozen solid titles. That cover enough variety to satisfy most. Further more the 360 has a few more decent exclusive titles beyond that. There is a greater volume of highly anticipated, and highly rated games on both the 360 and the PS3. Finally the selection is much more diverse. For all the talk about Smash Brothers if someone doesn't like fighting games what do they have left.
1. 360 more solid titles, greater variation, significant exclusives, strong volume.
2. PS3 half a dozen solid titles, great variation, a notable exclusive, small volume.
3. Wii a few strong titles, niche variation, hand me a shovel, little kid games.