AussieGecko said:
cory.ok said:
why does that have any relevance to what i asked you? did you even read my post? the second part was direct to the other person that i quoted...
and btw, video game developers arent all involved in trying to prevent obesity, theyre just making games. its been shown that fitness games can sell well and the development cost for them are very low. its a good business move, nothing more.
why are you giving me a hard time for not like the same thing that you like? god damn lay off buddy, i gave my opinion and thats that, if you dont like it dont cry, just move on
|
It is involved because you said you want to just sit on the couch, that is exactly the type of medium that gaming is stuck with.
I am not giving you a hard time for your opinion, I am questioning why you are severely criticising Kinect for something that very few people should care about.
|
gaming isnt stuck on the couch, gaming is on the couch because thats where a majority of consumers want it to be. i stand at work all day, get home and run around with my kids. at night, when i play games i want to relax, not jump up and down looking like a jackass.
something that very few people should care about? didnt you start the conversation saying that too many people care about it?
i bring forth my evidence!
AussieGecko said:
cory.ok said:
i hope it doesnt get lots of support, or if it does, a minimalistic use of kinect. i like sitting on my couch and playing games, i like my controller. ='(
|
I really dont get posts like this... if it was one or two... ok maybe that would make sense but its endless on every kinect thread.
|
and btw, in that post (my first post) i explained my reasons for my critizism, i like my controller, what dont you understand about this? i thought it was pretty straightforward.
try and be intelligent and consistent in your future posts, thanks