This could seriously hurt PS3 sales short term in their best region by far. Bad news indeed!
This could seriously hurt PS3 sales short term in their best region by far. Bad news indeed!
Xen said:
Given that the article is dated January 6th 2011, I now expect cheaper and shittier Sony TV's. And the Bravia in our living room was purchased mid 2010, so it's untouched. Recommended TV's are usually Panasonic/Samsung/Sony/Sharp. Not without a reason. |
Must be good enough for Sony if they decide to use them, right?
Besides, Samsung has been supplying the larger LCDs to Sony, since Sony refused to follow the rest of the market into flat panel screens, stubbornly hanging on to their Trinitron CRTs. So, why not just get a Samsung? They designed the panel, so probably have more knowledge of it's limitations. And for MUCH cheaper price than Sony, to boot.
Seece said:
You're right, it's a different case, the MS one was more stupid, they didn't actually take anything from anyone in the first place. |
I'm usually on the side of court decisions, but even I agree that one was beyond unnecessary. It would be like if Nintendo got in trouble for putting wii sports with every wii.
kurasakiichimaru said: M$ backing LG confirmed??? :( |
ROFLOL...
Yikes...this can't be good for sales in PS3 biggest market...Sony had better hope NA case does get another injunction against it as well, otherwise that’s going to be one heck of a hurt locker to be placed in? This is probably going to cost a pretty penny to be resolved quickly, especially given that comparatively, the patents Sony is suing LG over are probably nowhere as valuable as these that LG are suing Sony over. Geohotz seems like an afterthought at this point….
So..."confirmed" Sony using other people's tech in their products!
Acevil said:
|
European law is just pathetic tbh.
kowenicki said:
and an expected response from you. very different indeed: One was a company bundling free software with its OS, the other is a company (allegedly) stealing intellectual property from a rival.... (I actually doubt this will stick tbh but I cant believe some of the responses in here) |
Bundling or forcing people to use their crappy browser. And something needed to be done about it. I wish we can stop them from shoving bing in our faces as well.
Next Gen
11/20/09 04:25 | makingmusic476 | Warning | Other (Your avatar is borderline NSFW. Please keep it for as long as possible.) |
fordy said:
Must be good enough for Sony if they decide to use them, right? Besides, Samsung has been supplying the larger LCDs to Sony, since Sony refused to follow the rest of the market into flat panel screens, stubbornly hanging on to their Trinitron CRTs. So, why not just get a Samsung? They designed the panel, so probably have more knowledge of it's limitations. And for MUCH cheaper price than Sony, to boot. |
Good enough =/= as good as others.
And Samsung TV's are a good choice (albeit not THAT much cheaper than Sony's)... Sony's screens are acually theirs - developed in a joint venture with Samsung.
kowenicki said:
forcing? crappy browser? shoving bing in our faces? you seem angry... |
I was thinking the same think...and OH...I'm sure he is VERY angry...WW Hulk angry...lol.
PS3 was all set to "DOMINATE" in 2011, now it looks like we possibly won't see a price cut...oh-oh!?!?
psrock said:
Bundling or forcing people to use their crappy browser. And something needed to be done about it. I wish we can stop them from shoving bing in our faces as well. |
So they shouldn't be allowed to bundle their browser with their OS? I don't even use IE, but I still see that's a bunch of crap. Nobody would be forced to use anything though, so I'm not sure where you're getting that from.