LivingMetal said:
youarebadatgames said:
Edgeoflife said:
Not bad just worse then alot of other games that don't sell as much, and you'd still be wrong nomatter what you say
|
Oh yeah? Prove it.
Yeah, you can't when the value of a game is an opinion. BTW, my dad can beat up your dad.
|
Were you the one who thinks that a game is better just because it sells more than another?
|
It is to the majority of people. Might not to everyone, but games with wide appeal are usually doing something right.
A game's value is individually subjective, but to devs and publishers they usually quantify "better" by sales, since it's the most meaningful feedback as to the value people find in their work. So if you wanted to define "better" as in wide ranging appeal, games can be ranked - and it usually correlates with sales.
In summary - "better", "worse", and "quality" is opinion, but sales data is objective and you can use that to infer wide ranging appeal, which is arguably more important to devs than maximizing metacritic scores.