By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sales Discussion - Over-priced DLC (Specifically Call of Duty 1st Strike)

GuiltySpartan77 said:

alot of these dlc haters for CoD are most likely just a bunch of people that play Single player games. Get over it this is nothing new so stop acting like it is. Pay attention to games that you actually own and go buy that dlc. 

I actually play about just as much MP as I do single player. It's pretty even, games like CoD, Gears and Halo I'll play a lot more multiplayer, but then games like Mass Effect don't have multiplayer so... it's pretty even.



What is with all the hate? Don't read GamrReview Articles. Contact me to ADD games to the Database
Vote for the March Most Wanted / February Results

Around the Network
Michael-5 said:
chocoloco said:

If I'm not mistaken the stupid microsoft system is 800 MS points equals $10 making the content cost $15.

OT: I hate to support Activision anything thats why i bought all of the Cods used, but this time I have enjoyed black ops so much its hard not to want to get some new experiences. Their price should anger people, yet the game is very addicting and a lot of people just cannot stop playing. They know people are hooked and like drug lord with his coke whores Activision knows their bitches will do anything for the next high. Sadly, I might break down this time and actually buy their shit, but I must admit it has provided me with hours of fun.

I live in Canada, my price may vary. If I buy Microsoft Points at the store, or over XBL at regular price, I pay about 1.5 cents per microsoft point. So 800MP to me is $12, 400MP is $6, and 1200MP is $18.

The Canadian dollar is above the US dollar now too, and I've heard that in mainland Europe the MP scales higher, as games are also more expensive there.

Also yes, I agree CoD games are really fun games, especially online. I loved Modern Warfare 1, and the main reason I never bought MW2 or WaW used was because it never came down in price. My friend also got MW2, so I kind of felt I owed him a CoD experience, and as soon as this game dropped to $50, I bought it used. However Infinity Ward titles are much better, and after the legal issue of Activision not paying Infinity Ward heads Royalties, and firing them, I don't think I'll buy the game out of etiguette.

Well I guess Canadians and Europeans get ripped of by Microsoft more than Americans do. So you must have a bigger grievance with MS and Activision than I do.

I do have to say though I do not think IW's games are better. If you played enough MW2 you would know it was a camping nightmare fill with cheaters and boosters constantly destroying the fun value. I hear black ops has been hacked on the PS3, but on my 360 the game has a lot less problems. Practically zero boosting and the game is far better balanced for camping and for people that like to charge around like mad men.

MW original might have been the most innovative, but to me it was the most boring. I'm one of those rare guys who liked waw better with it's only fault being the vehicles.

Anyways if ypu spend enough time playing the game than you will get your moneys worth, but obviously if you don't it is a complete rip off. I certainly don't like Activisions cockiness with the extreme pricing though, it is an annoying factor.



The thing that sucks with CoD DLC is after a while you can't play matchmaking without getting the new maps. So they are basically trying to force people to get them. With Halo at least you don't have to have the DLC to play matchmaking.



Love the product, not the company. They love your money, not you.

-TheRealMafoo

Goddbless said:

The thing that sucks with CoD DLC is after a while you can't play matchmaking without getting the new maps. So they are basically trying to force people to get them. With Halo at least you don't have to have the DLC to play matchmaking.

That's not true at all and you know it.  I didn't buy my first map pack on MW2 until a month before Black Ops and never had a problem.



Money can't buy happiness. Just video games, which make me happy.

it is what it is people there are too many people out their that will buy DLC for this price without a 2nd thought, i mean their are people paying to play games online!!! You have to pay to play a portion of a game you just bought for 50-60 bucks so i dont know why people get shocked when they see these DLC #s. Nothing you can do but not support it.



Around the Network
Michael-5 said:
Mr Puggsly said:
Michael-5 said:
Mr Puggsly said:

If a game has pay DLC that adds hours of entertainment I don't mind paying for it.

It should also be noted that games today have more value than past gens regardless if you choose to purchase DLC.

I just hate when games don't feel complete unless you get the DLC. For example Fallout 3 continued the story with DLC, but I feel the story should end with actual game. Dragon Age did the same and whored DLC within the game which was annoying.

Modern games adding hours of entertainment these days is only contributable to Online play. I played as much Goldeneye as I did any FPS this gen, and I definatly played more Mario Kart 64 then Forza, GT, and current Mario Kart combined.

Without online, outside the RPG kingdom, games are getting shorter. FPS's used to last 15 hours, now they last 4-5, and to make up for that they add insane difficulty setting to make up for it.

I'm only complaining about the cost of this DLC. $18 for a few maps? This is not something that really adds to the game, I just want 1 more zombie map, and space monkeys, for an affordable price.

There are quite a few games that have DLC that add to the single player experience. But some of the more popular DLC is maps for shooters.

Goldeneye and Mario Kart have no more value than a lot of games we see today. You probably played them so much because you were young, you didn't have many games to move on to, and you had time to waste. I remember when I was a kid I used to play the shit out of games I had and ofcourse I didn't have a lot of money to get new games. Now in my adult life, I just finish a game and move on to the next.

In the grand scheme $15 for DLC is not a lot of money, espeically if it can provide hours of entertainment. If its not worth that much to you than don't buy it. If you can spend countless hours on a mediocre shooter like Goldeneye, than you should have endless entertainment on Black Ops without DLC.

Mario Kart Wii retains the same value as Mario Kart 64. Gran Turismo 2 had 650 cars, and so did GT4, GT5 is not really that different. Also Counter Strike has just as much multiplayer value as Black Ops, maybe more.

Black Ops is still fun as hell without DLC, I just want the DLC, but $15 is a lot of money! I bought Front Mission and blur new for $20 and that has a lot more value then Black Ops. $10 is pricy in itself too, but that extra $5 add principle. Get 4 new maps, and a zombie map, or save up the money for this DLC, and get Alan Wake, Splinter Cell, Mod Nation Racers, Heavy Rain, or FFXIII?

It's just too much money for a few maps. Publishers are learning new ways to pump money out of gamers, and it's sickening.

E.G. Applie iPhones cost $12 to make due to slave labour. They charge hundreds!!! Who wins there?

As long as people buy it the price will go up, nothing will happen because we are acting too much like sheep and not enough like wolves.



oniyide said:

it is what it is people there are too many people out their that will buy DLC for this price without a 2nd thought, i mean their are people paying to play games online!!! You have to pay to play a portion of a game you just bought for 50-60 bucks so i dont know why people get shocked when they see these DLC #s. Nothing you can do but not support it.

That's the thing. Not supporting it and not buying it puts pressure to lower the price to something reasonable. Wolves are better than sheep my friend.



@stopstopp i get that man but as we've clearly seen their are way too many sheep and not enough wolves, its not like we can start eating them or convincing millions of people NOT to buy it. 



If people stop buying overpriced DLC then it will go down in price unfortunately people lack self control 



chocoloco said:
Michael-5 said:
chocoloco said:

If I'm not mistaken the stupid microsoft system is 800 MS points equals $10 making the content cost $15.

OT: I hate to support Activision anything thats why i bought all of the Cods used, but this time I have enjoyed black ops so much its hard not to want to get some new experiences. Their price should anger people, yet the game is very addicting and a lot of people just cannot stop playing. They know people are hooked and like drug lord with his coke whores Activision knows their bitches will do anything for the next high. Sadly, I might break down this time and actually buy their shit, but I must admit it has provided me with hours of fun.

I live in Canada, my price may vary. If I buy Microsoft Points at the store, or over XBL at regular price, I pay about 1.5 cents per microsoft point. So 800MP to me is $12, 400MP is $6, and 1200MP is $18.

The Canadian dollar is above the US dollar now too, and I've heard that in mainland Europe the MP scales higher, as games are also more expensive there.

Also yes, I agree CoD games are really fun games, especially online. I loved Modern Warfare 1, and the main reason I never bought MW2 or WaW used was because it never came down in price. My friend also got MW2, so I kind of felt I owed him a CoD experience, and as soon as this game dropped to $50, I bought it used. However Infinity Ward titles are much better, and after the legal issue of Activision not paying Infinity Ward heads Royalties, and firing them, I don't think I'll buy the game out of etiguette.

Well I guess Canadians and Europeans get ripped of by Microsoft more than Americans do. So you must have a bigger grievance with MS and Activision than I do.

I do have to say though I do not think IW's games are better. If you played enough MW2 you would know it was a camping nightmare fill with cheaters and boosters constantly destroying the fun value. I hear black ops has been hacked on the PS3, but on my 360 the game has a lot less problems. Practically zero boosting and the game is far better balanced for camping and for people that like to charge around like mad men.

MW original might have been the most innovative, but to me it was the most boring. I'm one of those rare guys who liked waw better with it's only fault being the vehicles.

Anyways if ypu spend enough time playing the game than you will get your moneys worth, but obviously if you don't it is a complete rip off. I certainly don't like Activisions cockiness with the extreme pricing though, it is an annoying factor.

Give Black Ops a year and it will be full of the same type of gamers camping and boosting, and on 360 I think all CoD titles get less hacking, I've played on both. MW2 had a really good co-op campaign, but surprisingly Black Ops has really good level design.

I hated WaW, campaign was just a grendae fest, but online, zombie mode, pretty fun.

CoD is worth the price, but the DLC is not



What is with all the hate? Don't read GamrReview Articles. Contact me to ADD games to the Database
Vote for the March Most Wanted / February Results