I was referring to your comment about the "eliminationist rhetoric". I guess I should have been more explicit. I assumed you could figure it out, I was wrong.
Yeah, I guess you should have been since the "nothing whatsoever" part of my comment was in reference to her opponent inviting people to the shooting range.
Honestly, from what we know the guy sounds far more like a leftist than he does a Tea Party supporter. So it's entirely possible that he has a hate-on for Blue Dogs or whatever, but so far there's nothing linking him to the Democratic party, the Daily Kos, or anything else. He sounds like a loner who is entirely outside of the political mainstream, in addition to sounding mentally ill.
There's like a one in a million chance that he was motivated by what Kos said in that post. But, for the sake of argument, suppose he was. So what? Kos still wouldn't be responsible, since he didn't say anything that would motivate any rational person to kill someone. I absolutely loathe Kos, and responsible speech is all well and good, but we can't always mind our P's and Q's because our words might mingle with the voices in some lunatic mind in a way that causes people to get shot.