Well then msnbc,cnn,abc,cbs,nbc are the news that has no info

as in not vetting President Obama when he was running for President

That's why people "trust" FoxNews, because they actually reveal a lot more information about certain topics (although apparently it is wrong in certain cases...which can be expected, and looked up by people if they doubt it obviously)

Is this surprising in any way?

I'm not sure about the news on fox news, but the shows like O'Reilly Factor etc are blatant in their misinformation.

Also being the 'most trusted' news source does not make you the most accurate.

This is fun to do at a party

Walk up behind an unsuspecting Liberal and yell Fox News.

Watch em scream and dive behind furniture.

Obama did nothing..nothing before he became president.  We don't even know about his college transcripts.MSM didn't even bother to dig and he never released them.  He is supposed to be a genius but what is this based on?  Another good one is when someone says he is a Professor. Ah..no.

But the main stream media made sure we knew what brand of underwear Palin wore.What a disgrace.

I would believe Fox news before the Obama water carriers at the other news nets

SNL was definitely the top source of misinformation

You have to understand though, there is nothing wrong with liberals passing on misinformation, only when the "right" side does it.  I've gotten to the point where I'm almost just used to this and no longer care how hippocritical the liberals are about some of these dumb things.

The more sources you get your news from the more you notice that all news sources are highly manipulative and spread misinformation. How they do it varies from source to source, and story to story, but if you pay attention to the stories they choose to tell, which they emphasize, the perspective they tell the story from, the experts and average people they interview, the phrasing they use in the story and so on ...

Being that CNN is the news network I end up watching the most, it is the one I have a better understanding of their approach; and as a general rule, when a news story comes out that doesn't suit their world view they ignore it, and when that fails they bury and minimize it. There have been many times when I have seen a story covered by countless major sources for weeks before CNN bothers to cover them.

A good one was when fox news brought up Jeremiah Wright the other networks laughed and promised not to ask him about that. No there job was to shine his unit

There's not a single piece of evidence in that article to support what they are saying. It's just "Fox misleads, fox misleads, fox misleads...."

That article is misleading. They want you to believe what they are saying without supplying any real data from any reliable sources.