By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General Discussion - Stem Cells: Same-sex couples to have their own genetic children in future.

PS3beats360 said:
Seece said:

So if the baby has 2 males DNA (2 fathers) and a woman carrys the baby and gives birth, it's not her baby AT all?

Like we get a lot of surrogate mothers that change their mind ... in this case, would they have no choice but to give up the baby?

A surrogate mother should be forced to hand over the child or else. The two fathers have paid a lot of money for their own biological child. Surrogate has signed an agreement with the two fathers to accept the cash and hand over the child when the child is born. A legally binding agreement is an enforceable contract and the child is the property of the two fathers. 


Property?  A kid aint't property no matter how young it is.  Though seece, the law as currently written does give the surrogate rights, afterall plenty of surrogates now are carrying babies that are genitically not theirs but they are still considered the "Birth mother."

Surrogacy rights are tricky too, because when you think about it... most surrogates that aren't someone you know well... are likely very poor and pretty much need the money.  Even if they did make a law that says surrogacy contracts are now enforceable lots of surrogates could parobably argue they signed under economic distress.



Around the Network

I have a feeling genetically enhanced people are gonna lead to awesome shit!

Like Halo and Crackdown. I can't wait!



Recently Completed
River City: Rival Showdown
for 3DS (3/5) - River City: Tokyo Rumble for 3DS (4/5) - Zelda: BotW for Wii U (5/5) - Zelda: BotW for Switch (5/5) - Zelda: Link's Awakening for Switch (4/5) - Rage 2 for X1X (4/5) - Rage for 360 (3/5) - Streets of Rage 4 for X1/PC (4/5) - Gears 5 for X1X (5/5) - Mortal Kombat 11 for X1X (5/5) - Doom 64 for N64 (emulator) (3/5) - Crackdown 3 for X1S/X1X (4/5) - Infinity Blade III - for iPad 4 (3/5) - Infinity Blade II - for iPad 4 (4/5) - Infinity Blade - for iPad 4 (4/5) - Wolfenstein: The Old Blood for X1 (3/5) - Assassin's Creed: Origins for X1 (3/5) - Uncharted: Lost Legacy for PS4 (4/5) - EA UFC 3 for X1 (4/5) - Doom for X1 (4/5) - Titanfall 2 for X1 (4/5) - Super Mario 3D World for Wii U (4/5) - South Park: The Stick of Truth for X1 BC (4/5) - Call of Duty: WWII for X1 (4/5) -Wolfenstein II for X1 - (4/5) - Dead or Alive: Dimensions for 3DS (4/5) - Marvel vs Capcom: Infinite for X1 (3/5) - Halo Wars 2 for X1/PC (4/5) - Halo Wars: DE for X1 (4/5) - Tekken 7 for X1 (4/5) - Injustice 2 for X1 (4/5) - Yakuza 5 for PS3 (3/5) - Battlefield 1 (Campaign) for X1 (3/5) - Assassin's Creed: Syndicate for X1 (4/5) - Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare for X1 (4/5) - Call of Duty: MW Remastered for X1 (4/5) - Donkey Kong Country Returns for 3DS (4/5) - Forza Horizon 3 for X1 (5/5)

Interesting. Too bad this will probably kill adoption, especially that of non-white babies.



"I don't understand how someone could like Tolstoy and Dostoyevsky, but not like Twilight!!!"

"Last book I read was Brokeback Mountain, I just don't have the patience for them unless it's softcore porn."

                                                                               (The Voice of a Generation and Seece)

"If you cant stand the sound of your own voice than dont become a singer !!!!!"

                                                                               (pizzahut451)

That's pretty irrelevant. The future  will have a lot less gays - not that the current - 5% is much.

The (in part the same) selection techniques and human nature will make sure of that. We are already selecting on certain things. That list will be expanded and 'gay' will be on it.

Humans have always wanted to select on foetus' - creating the best of them. Now we will have the actual tools... and we will use them. Human nature is human nature.



In the wilderness we go alone with our new knowledge and strength.

Stefan.De.Machtige said:

That's pretty irrelevant. The future  will have a lot less gays - not that the current - 5% is much.

The (in part the same) selection techniques and human nature will make sure of that. We are already selecting on certain things. That list will be expanded and 'gay' will be on it.

Humans have always wanted to select on foetus' - creating the best of them. Now we will have the actual tools... and we will use them. Human nature is human nature.

Thankfully there are a lot more non prejudice people out there that would be happy with a gay child.



 

Around the Network
PureDante said:

This is just great. In the next thousand years we're gunna have a new generation of kids that are all grey with gay parents.

Homosexuals = Aliens confirmed?



“It appeared that there had even been demonstrations to thank Big Brother for raising the chocolate ration to twenty grams a week. And only yesterday, he reflected, it had been announced that the ration was to be reduced to twenty grams a week. Was it possible that they could swallow that, after only twenty-four hours? Yes, they swallowed it.”

- George Orwell, ‘1984’

Well if people want to spend many thousnds of dollars to have a child with their lover that is theirs genetically so be it. I can guarantee reproducing this experiment in humans is still a long ways away, even if mice are very genetically similar to humans as we are both mammals. This is also risky business because it seems very likely that there would be high levels of genetic disorders. Who knows? But this will not happen in humans for at least 20 years probably more.



PureDante said:

This is just great. In the next thousand years we're gunna have a new generation of kids that are all grey with gay parents.

agreed.

Reminds me of that movie What Planet are you from (2000). All males.

 



 

 

ghaleon1980 said:

This story, albeit interesting, doesn't really mean anything for the future of human children.  There are way too many differences between mice and humans to extrapolate success from one species to another.  Want an example???

C-L-O-N-I-N-G.

 

Look it up.  It has been done in several animal species but is yet to be accomplished in humans.

 

Peace out. 

The main difference in doing it in animals and humans is the ethics and the scales of the study. How many mice did they attempt this in before they were successful?

Human ehtics means that any studies of this nature in humans are very rare and unlikely to work even if the science itself is still sound.



Scoobes said:
ghaleon1980 said:

This story, albeit interesting, doesn't really mean anything for the future of human children.  There are way too many differences between mice and humans to extrapolate success from one species to another.  Want an example???

C-L-O-N-I-N-G.

 

Look it up.  It has been done in several animal species but is yet to be accomplished in humans.

 

Peace out. 

The main difference in doing it in animals and humans is the ethics and the scales of the study. How many mice did they attempt this in before they were successful?

Human ehtics means that any studies of this nature in humans are very rare and unlikely to work even if the science itself is still sound.

 

"Ethics" alone is not the reason why human cloning has not been successful.  This may be true in industrial, modernized countries such as the US but I can assure you that there are plenty of research teams in other countries that disregard the "ethics" involved and have still been unsuccessful.