By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Sony and Microsoft will join forces within the next 10 - 15 years

CGI-Quality said:
Antabus said:
CGI-Quality said:
Antabus said:

You are one to speak, you try to create a strawman by twisting my words. Then you take my honest question as "insult" and start insulting me back. Insecure much, eh?

And once again, twisting my words. :D Where did I say that only kids bought PS2? Show me, please. If you are incapable of doing that, you should not "post in the forums".

I insulted you? OK pal.

Nothing was twisted - http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3760876 "That controller did something right ONLY for people with really tiny hands".

Your words, bud. I was just informing you that 102 million PS1 owners and 146 million PS2 owners can't all just have really tiny hands. In other words, the controller design did something right.

So the problem is with your capability to understand what you read. From my point of view, that is true. It did good only for people with really tiny hands. I can't imagine how small your hand is if you feel that DS is comfortable.

Where did I insult you? You called my question a "pathetic attempt to insult".

Asking people if they are "having problems at home" or calling people "butthurt" is considered inflammatory, just so you know. It brings nothing to the conversation and is used as a means to rile people up.

Now on topic - I understood perfectly what I read, and heavily disagreed with it, which is why I debated it. Your view on the controller is an absolute opinion, but I know there are millions of people with big hands that love the Dualshock design. To say something like: "you can't imagine how small your hand is if you feel that DS is comfortable" is debatable. All I'm saying. The controller appeals to many people who's hands aren't tiny.

First comment was not inflammatory, it was made because you made a comment with the sole purpose to raise argument. You just twisted my words to suite your own argument. I haven't seen you starting many arguments like that so I asked. Now I know better. For the second part, yes. That was not necessary.

How do you know that there are millions of people with big hands who love the ds? How do you know that they would not prefer a 360 controller instead?

If you did understand what I said, why did you twist my words?

 



Around the Network
CGI-Quality said:


Antabus said:

So the problem is with your capability to understand what you read. From my point of view, that is true. It did good only for people with really tiny hands. I can't imagine how small your hand is if you feel that DS is comfortable.

Where did I insult you? You called my question a "pathetic attempt to insult".

Asking people if they are "having problems at home" or calling people "butthurt" is considered inflammatory, just so you know. It brings nothing to the conversation and is used as a means to rile people up.

Now on topic - I understood perfectly what I read, and heavily disagreed with it, which is why I debated it. Your view on the controller is an absolute opinion, but I know there are millions of people with big hands that love the Dualshock design. To say something like: "you can't imagine how small your hand is if you feel that DS is comfortable" is debatable. All I'm saying. The controller appeals to many people who's hands aren't tiny.

First comment was not inflammatory, it was made because you made a comment with the sole purpose to raise argument. You just twisted my words to suite your own argument. I haven't seen you starting many arguments like that so I asked. Now I know better. For the second part, yes. That was not necessary.

How do you know that there are millions of people with big hands who love the ds? How do you know that they would not prefer a 360 controller instead?

If you did understand what I said, why did you twist my words?

 

Your argument is now changing. What does the 360 controller have to do with it? I didn't say anything about prefered taste. I said the Dualshock design did something right to have worked 3 gens in a row. The 360 controller wasn't always around, so it's irrelevant to my point.

And how do I know millions of people like the Dualshock controller, well........I think the brand speaks for itself. You don't buy a console if the controller is useless, regardless of "better options".


And I said that dualshock did nothing good for people with big hands. I bet those people would be happier with another controller. 360 controller is the best for my hands so I mentioned it. As in a controller shaped like 360 controller.

If you are talking about ps2, you bought the console regardless of the controller. It had all the games.



CGI-Quality said:
Antabus said:


And I said that dualshock did nothing good for people with big hands. 360 controller is the best for my hands so I mentioned it. As in a controller shaped like 360 controller.

And that's back to my original argument, it obviously did something right to have worked all this time (big or small hands). It also added something to controllers - dual analog.

YOU prefer the 360 controller, nothing wrong with that. But not everyone with big hands agrees with you.


Gahhh.. and not everyone agrees that ds is good for big hands.

 

And that guy does not even have big hands.



CGI-Quality said:

I didn't say everyone agreed with me, I said your point can be debated, which it has been. You just made a claim that was refutable.

Show me one person with big hands who actually likes dualshock and I concede that my claim might be refuted.



Now there is a good controller for big hands, the Duke! :)



Around the Network
CGI-Quality said:
Antabus said:
CGI-Quality said:

I didn't say everyone agreed with me, I said your point can be debated, which it has been. You just made a claim that was refutable.

Show me one person with big hands who actually likes dualshock and I concede that my claim might be refuted.

Just ask people on this very site. The concept of it being liked by people with big hands really isn't inconceivable.

I am waiting for someone to comment on that. I would like to know how they are holding their controllers...



Necromunda said:

I can see Google getting together with Sony. Imagine what that could bring.


Awesomeness



Kratos_36 said:
Reasonable said:
chocoloco said:

No, I like competition and Nintendos games are to different from Sony's and Microsofts to really push quality in software and hardware to gain sales and loyalty. Microsoft and Sony's battle for the hardcore forces them to work hard to out do each other and actually not be a big, fat, complacent fat man who can throw shitty hardware and software at us leaving the customer with no choice, but to take what is thrown at them or to quit gaming.


I share your sentiment, but that's exactly one of the reasons I could see Sony/MS joing forces - unless they both feel they're going to far down their own paths now.

MS wanted to partner with Sony initially so it's not like the idea is even without precedent.

Personally, if Sony were will to accept a console they build and sell with MS OS and DirectX and a shared infrastructure I could definately see them getting together.  They want to make money and their actual goals are fairly complimentary overall.

Not that it would necessarily be overall good for the end consumer, but from a business perspective it makes a lot of sense.

Playstation with Windows ? Lets hope not... Don't want to play and get a BSOD while playing Uncharted 6.


C'mon, just think of the fun as you boot up Windows 9 on PlayXbox 1.



Try to be reasonable... its easier than you think...

Its a penis length / hand size issue. The smaller the hands the more time available to spend playing with yourself.

 



Tease.

gurglesletch said:
Necromunda said:

I can see Google getting together with Sony. Imagine what that could bring.


Awesomeness



 A virus infected, narcissistic, running of the mouth smoking pile of sh-t.