By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General Discussion - Poppy-burning Muslims interrupt the 2 minutes of silence in the UK

RageBot said:


So, do you agree with me that, today, as a whole (or at least the majority of it), Islam is a religon led by violent pepole?

Do you understand that pepole rightfully fear the Islam religon, and wish the muslims to leave their country? When pepole look at the muslims, they don't see pepole like you, they see pepole who want nothing but their death, and a large majority who does nothing to stop them.

Trust me, I know from my own life experience that not all muslims are "like that", I know several muslims who are really intelligent and nice human beings.

Yes. The primary "leaders" of Islam in the Muslim world are people who focus on the writings outside of the Qur'an (Hadiths). They are doing the exact same thing as Christianity's leaders did in the Dark Ages. They control their followers with fear and violence and specially selected teachings to not only stay in power, but force their ways across the world. I can only hope that in my lifetime I'll see the beginnings of an Islamic "Renaissance" coming from the western world just as it did with the historical Renaissance from Muslim Spain.

I fully understand the fear and anger towards the Muslim world, however, I do not condone ignorance and will not perpetrate its teachings. I will argue with a Muslim about these horrid actions just as I will with the OP. In fact, I've gotten into many heated debates at my Mosque and when I was going to the University with foreign Muslims about a wide range of topics from dress to attacks on civilians (this is prohibited in the Qur'an btw).

However, I know that the large majority of the 1.5 billion Muslims around the world don't believe they must kill non-Muslims as a commandment. That's simply proven by the fact that it just doesn't happen. If it were happening you'd see far higher murder rates all throughout the world as every nation has a sizable Muslim population. In reality these incidents are localized to specific areas (commonly Muslims against other Muslims) and for specific political causes like actual wars or Israel.



Around the Network
superchunk said:
RageBot said:
 


So, do you agree with me that, today, as a whole (or at least the majority of it), Islam is a religon led by violent pepole?

Do you understand that pepole rightfully fear the Islam religon, and wish the muslims to leave their country? When pepole look at the muslims, they don't see pepole like you, they see pepole who want nothing but their death, and a large majority who does nothing to stop them.

Trust me, I know from my own life experience that not all muslims are "like that", I know several muslims who are really intelligent and nice human beings.

Yes. The primary "leaders" of Islam in the Muslim world are people who focus on the writings outside of the Qur'an (Hadiths). They are doing the exact same thing as Christianity's leaders did in the Dark Ages. They control their followers with fear and violence and specially selected teachings to not only stay in power, but force their ways across the world. I can only hope that in my lifetime I'll see the beginnings of an Islamic "Renaissance" coming from the western world just as it did with the historical Renaissance from Muslim Spain.

I fully understand the fear and anger towards the Muslim world, however, I do not condone ignorance and will not perpetrate its teachings. I will argue with a Muslim about these horrid actions just as I will with the OP. In fact, I've gotten into many heated debates at my Mosque and when I was going to the University with foreign Muslims about a wide range of topics from dress to attacks on civilians (this is prohibited in the Qur'an btw).

However, I know that the large majority of the 1.5 billion Muslims around the world don't believe they must kill non-Muslims as a commandment. That's simply proven by the fact that it just doesn't happen. If it were happening you'd see far higher murder rates all throughout the world as every nation has a sizable Muslim population. In reality these incidents are localized to specific areas (commonly Muslims against other Muslims) and for specific political causes like actual wars or Israel.


Taqqya at its finest.

You can fool others but you cant fool me, if its prohibited why are there over 100 verses of violence in the quran?

Yeah, post a mekkan peaceful one, but you clearly now if 2 things condraticts each other, the newer one is taken (verses from medina)

So if its "tolerate the unbelievers and live peaceful with them together" in a meccanic verse and in another sura its "I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them"  (Quran 8:12) in a verse from medina, the one from medina counts because its newer.

 

 




Fedor Emelianenko - Greatest Fighter and most humble man to ever walk the earth:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lVVrNOQtlzY

Some violent verses from the quran (only quran not the hadiths) that clearly show that killing cilivans  is prohibited/ sarcasm

oh, maybe you just meant muslim civilians, but lets look what the quran says about "unbelievers" (christians, jews, atheists, hindu, and so on)

Quran (2:191-193) - "And slay them wherever ye find them, and drive them out of the places whence they drove you out, for persecution [of Muslims] is worse than slaughter [of non-believers]...and fight them until persecution is no more, and religion is for Allah."  There is a good case to be made that the textual context of this particular passage is defensive war, even if the historical context was not.  However, there are also two worrisome pieces to this verse.  The first is that the killing of others is authorized in the event of "persecution" (a qualification that is ambiguous at best).  The second is that fighting may persist until "religion is for Allah."  The example set by Muhammad is not reassuring.

 

Quran (2:244) - "Then fight in the cause of Allah, and know that Allah Heareth and knoweth all things."

 

Quran (2:216) - "Fighting is prescribed for you, and ye dislike it. But it is possible that ye dislike a thing which is good for you, and that ye love a thing which is bad for you. But Allah knoweth, and ye know not."  Not only does this verse establish that violence can be virtuous, but it also contradicts the myth that fighting is intended only in self-defense, since the audience was obviously not under attack at the time.  From the Hadith, we know that Muhammad was actually trying to motivate his people into raiding caravans with this verse.

 

Quran (3:56) - "As to those who reject faith, I will punish them with terrible agony in this world and in the Hereafter, nor will they have anyone to help."

 

Quran (3:151) - "Soon shall We cast terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers, for that they joined companions with Allah, for which He had sent no authority".  This speaks directly of polytheists, yet it also includes Christians, since they believe in the Trinity (ie. what Muhammad incorrectly believed to be 'joining companions to Allah').

 

Quran (4:74) - "Let those fight in the way of Allah who sell the life of this world for the other. Whoso fighteth in the way of Allah, be he slain or be he victorious, on him We shall bestow a vast reward."  The martyrs of Islam are unlike the early Christians, led meekly to the slaughter.  These Muslims are killed in battle, as they attempt to inflict death and destruction for the cause of Allah.  Here is the theological basis for today's suicide bombers.

 

Quran (4:76) - "Those who believe fight in the cause of Allah…"

 

Quran (4:89) - "They but wish that ye should reject Faith, as they do, and thus be on the same footing (as they): But take not friends from their ranks until they flee in the way of Allah (From what is forbidden). But if they turn renegades, seize them and slay them wherever ye find them; and (in any case) take no friends or helpers from their ranks."

 

Quran (4:95) - "Not equal are those believers who sit (at home) and receive no hurt, and those who strive and fight in the cause of Allah with their goods and their persons. Allah hath granted a grade higher to those who strive and fight with their goods and persons than to those who sit (at home). Unto all (in Faith) Hath Allah promised good: But those who strive and fight Hath He distinguished above those who sit (at home) by a special reward,-"  This passage criticizes "peaceful" Muslims who do not join in the violence, letting them know that they are less worthy in Allah's eyes.  It also demolishes the modern myth that "Jihad" doesn't mean holy war in the Quran, but rather a spiritual struggle.  Not only is the Arabic word used in this passage, but it is clearly not referring to anything spiritual, since the physically disabled are given exemption.  (The Hadith reveals the context of the passage to be in response to a blind man's protest that he is unable to engage in Jihad and this is reflected in other translations of the verse).

 

Quran (4:104) - "And be not weak hearted in pursuit of the enemy; if you suffer pain, then surely they (too) suffer pain as you suffer pain..."  Is pursuing an injured and retreating enemy really an act of self-defense?

 

Quran (5:33) - "The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His messenger and strive to make mischief in the land is only this, that they should be murdered or crucified or their hands and their feet should be cut off on opposite sides or they should be imprisoned; this shall be as a disgrace for them in this world, and in the hereafter they shall have a grievous chastisement"

 

Quran (8:12) - "I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them"  No reasonable person would interpret this to mean a spiritual struggle.

 

Quran (8:15) - "O ye who believe! When ye meet those who disbelieve in battle, turn not your backs to them. (16)Whoso on that day turneth his back to them, unless maneuvering for battle or intent to join a company, he truly hath incurred wrath from Allah, and his habitation will be hell, a hapless journey's end."

 

Quran (8:39) - "And fight with them until there is no more persecution and religion should be only for Allah"  From the historical context we know that the "persecution" spoken of here was simply the refusal by the Meccans to allow Muhammad to enter their city and perform the Haj.  Other Muslims were able to travel there, just not as an armed group, since Muhammad declared war on Mecca prior to his eviction.  The Meccans were also acting in defense of their religion, since it was Muhammad's intention to destroy their idols and establish Islam by force (which he later did).  Hence the critical part of this verse is to fight until "religion is only for Allah."  According to Ibn Ishaq (324), Muhammad justified the violence further by explaining that "Allah must have no rivals."

 

Quran (8:57) - "If thou comest on them in the war, deal with them so as to strike fear in those who are behind them, that haply they may remember."

 

Quran (8:59-60) - "And let not those who disbelieve suppose that they can outstrip (Allah's Purpose). Lo! they cannot escape.  Make ready for them all thou canst of (armed) force and of horses tethered, that thereby ye may dismay the enemy of Allah and your enemy."

 

Quran (9:5) - "So when the sacred months have passed away, then slay the idolaters wherever you find them, and take them captives and besiege them and lie in wait for them in every ambush, then if they repent and keep up prayer and pay the poor-rate, leave their way free to them."  According to this verse, the best way of staying safe from Muslim violence is to convert to Islam.  Prayer (salat) and the poor tax (zakat) are among the religions Five Pillars.

 

Quran (9:14) - "Fight them, Allah will punish them by your hands and bring them to disgrace..."

 

Quran (9:20) - "Those who believe, and have left their homes and striven with their wealth and their lives in Allah's way are of much greater worth in Allah's sight. These are they who are triumphant."  The "striving" spoken of here is Jihad.

 

Quran (9:29) - "Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued."  "People of the Book" refers to Christians and Jews.  This was one of the final "revelations" from Allah and it set in motion the tenacious military expansion, in which Muhammad's companions managed to conquer two-thirds of the Christian world in just the next 100 years.  Islam is intended to dominate all other people and faiths.

 

Quran (9:30) - "And the Jews say: Ezra is the son of Allah; and the Christians say: The Messiah is the son of Allah; these are the words of their mouths; they imitate the saying of those who disbelieved before; may Allah destroy them; how they are turned away!"

 

Quran (9:38-39) - "O ye who believe! what is the matter with you, that, when ye are asked to go forth in the cause of Allah, ye cling heavily to the earth? Do ye prefer the life of this world to the Hereafter? But little is the comfort of this life, as compared with the Hereafter. Unless ye go forth, He will punish you with a grievous penalty, and put others in your place."  This is a warning to those who refuse to fight, that they will be punished with Hell.

 

Quran (9:41) - "Go forth, light-armed and heavy-armed, and strive with your wealth and your lives in the way of Allah! That is best for you if ye but knew."  See also the verse that follows (9:42) - "If there had been immediate gain (in sight), and the journey easy, they would (all) without doubt have followed thee, but the distance was long, (and weighed) on them"  This contradicts the myth that Muslims are to fight only in self-defense, since the wording implies that battle will be waged a long distance from home (in another country and on Christian soil, in this case, according to the historians).

 

Quran (9:73) - "O Prophet! strive hard against the unbelievers and the hypocrites and be unyielding to them; and their abode is hell, and evil is the destination."  Dehumanizing those who reject Islam, by reminding Muslims that they are merely firewood for Hell, makes it easier to justify slaughter.  It also explains why today's devout Muslims have little regard for those outside the faith.

 

Quran (9:88) - "But the Messenger, and those who believe with him, strive and fight with their wealth and their persons: for them are (all) good things: and it is they who will prosper."

 

Quran (9:111) - "Allah hath purchased of the believers their persons and their goods; for theirs (in return) is the garden (of Paradise): they fight in His cause, and slay and are slain: a promise binding on Him in truth, through the Law, the Gospel, and the Quran: and who is more faithful to his covenant than Allah? then rejoice in the bargain which ye have concluded: that is the achievement supreme."

 

Quran (9:123) - "O you who believe! fight those of the unbelievers who are near to you and let them find in you hardness."

 

Quran (8:65-81) - This parable lays the theological groundwork for honor killings, in which a family member is murdered because they brought shame to the family, either through apostasy or perceived moral indiscretion.  The story, which is not found in any Jewish or Christian source, tells of Moses encountering a man with "special knowledge" who does things which don't seem to make sense on the surface, but are then justified according to later explanation.  One such action is to murder a youth for no apparent reason (74).  However, the wise man later explains that it was feared that the boy would "grieve" his parents by "disobedience and ingratitude."  He was killed so that Allah could provide them a 'better' son.

 

Quran (21:44) - "We gave the good things of this life to these men and their fathers until the period grew long for them; See they not that We gradually reduce the land (in their control) from its outlying borders? Is it then they who will win?"

 

Quran (25:52) - "Therefore listen not to the Unbelievers, but strive against them with the utmost strenuousness..."   "Strive against" is Jihad - obviously not in the personal context.  It's also significant to point out that this is a Meccan verse.

 

Quran (33:60-62) - "If the hypocrites, and those in whose hearts is a disease, and the alarmists in the city do not cease, We verily shall urge thee on against them, then they will be your neighbors in it but a little while.  Accursed, they will be seized wherever found and slain with a (fierce) slaughter."   This passage sanctions the slaughter (rendered "merciless" and "horrible murder" in other translations) against three groups: Hypocrites (Muslims who refuse to "fight in the way of Allah" (3:167) and hence don't act as Muslims should), those with "diseased hearts" (which include Jews and Christians 5:51-52), and "alarmists" or "agitators who include those who merely speak out against Islam, according to Muhammad's biographers.  It is worth noting that the victims are to be sought out by Muslims, which is what today's terrorists do.  If this passage is meant merely to apply to the city of Medina, then it is unclear why it is included in Allah's eternal word to Muslim generations.

 

Quran (47:3-4) - "Those who reject Allah follow vanities, while those who believe follow the truth from their lord.  Thus does Allah set forth form men their lessons by similtudes.  Therefore when you meet in battle those who disbelieve, then smite the necks until when you have overcome them, then make (them) prisoners,"  Those who reject Allah are to be subdued in battle.  The verse goes on to say the only reason Allah doesn't do the dirty work himself is in order to to test the faithfulness of Muslims.  Those who kill pass the test. "But if it had been Allah's Will, He could certainly have exacted retribution from them (Himself); but (He lets you fight) in order to test you, some with others. But those who are slain in the Way of Allah,- He will never let their deeds be lost."

 

Quran (47:35) - "Be not weary and faint-hearted, crying for peace, when ye should be uppermost (Shakir: "have the upper hand") for Allah is with you,"  This very important verse asserts that the Religion of Peace is not to grant peace to the broader society until Islamic rule has been established. 

 

Quran (48:17) - "There is no blame for the blind, nor is there blame for the lame, nor is there blame for the sick (that they go not forth to war). And whoso obeyeth Allah and His messenger, He will make him enter Gardens underneath which rivers flow; and whoso turneth back, him will He punish with a painful doom."  Contemporary apologists sometimes claim that Jihad means 'spiritual struggle.'  Is so, then why are the blind, lame and sick exempted?

 

Quran (48:29) - "Muhammad is the messenger of Allah. And those with him are hard (ruthless) against the disbelievers and merciful among themselves"  Islam is not about treating everyone equally.  There are two very distinct standards that are applied based on religious status.

 

Quran (61:4) - "Surely Allah loves those who fight in His way"  Religion of Peace, indeed!  This is followed by (61:9): "He it is who has sent His Messenger (Mohammed) with guidance and the religion of truth (Islam) to make it victorious over all religions even though the infidels may resist."

 

Quran (61:10-12) - "O ye who believe! Shall I lead you to a bargain that will save you from a grievous Penalty?- That ye believe in Allah and His Messenger, and that ye strive (your utmost) in the Cause of Allah, with your property and your persons: That will be best for you, if ye but knew! He will forgive you your sins, and admit you to Gardens beneath which Rivers flow, and to beautiful mansions in Gardens of Eternity."  This verse was given in battle.  It uses the Arabic word, Jihad.

 

Quran (66:9) - "O Prophet! Strive against the disbelievers and the hypocrites, and be stern with them. Hell will be their home, a hapless journey's end."  The root word of "Jihad" is used again here.  The context is clearly holy war, and the scope of violence is broadened to include "hypocrites" - those who call themselves Muslims but do not act as such.



Fedor Emelianenko - Greatest Fighter and most humble man to ever walk the earth:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lVVrNOQtlzY

The real funny thing about this thread is that some people are burning poppies as a protest against what?

Western or European aggression the world over.

People are being killed in Afghanistan for no reason other than conquest, only the fools still hold on to Bin Laden (who?) and 911.

People are being killed in Iraq for no reason other than conquest, only the fools hang on to WMD's.

People are being killed in Somalia because they're trying to protect their waters from having nuclear waste illegally dumped  by the west/Europe, they are called pirates.

And some people protesting whilst burning a poppy is a travesty?

You Can't Be Serious!!!!!



And people really think they could live peacefully together with people who believe what is written in this book, just wait until they are more than 50% in your country and the genocide will start



Fedor Emelianenko - Greatest Fighter and most humble man to ever walk the earth:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lVVrNOQtlzY

Around the Network
ProdigyBam said:
superchunk said:

That's part of the problem.

Too often we have these highly vocal people within Islam and like the OP outside of Islam very happily pushing the idea that Islam teaches violence commanded as an action towards nonMuslims and that actions like these are the only true response.

Combine that with who's actually in control in Muslim lands and what will happen to those who would speak out against these actions and you have a self-fullfilling cycle of hatred and ignorance.

Thankfully I live in the US and as Muslim I can come out and say how wrong these actions are OR how wrong suicide bombing is and that they will go to hell for their actions. This can all happen without fear of being targeted by those who simply want exteamist views to thrive and remain in power.

What you ask for simply can't happen today. Just like it took the deaths of many during the Dark Ages who spoke out against Christianities ignorance and killings, it will take the same now for Islam. Unfortunately, people like the OP are too wrapped up in their ignorance to see the similarities and acknowldege that its better to try to teach full/real version of the Qur'an instead of cherry picking the 10% that when looked out out of context provides support for violent and evil behaviour.

I've considered many times writing a book on Islam's history and full look into the Prophet and the Qur'an. Yet I haven't as I'm afraid some idiot in the Middle East would ignorantly proclaim I'm a heretic and want my head. When in reality he is the one bastardizing the word of God.

@ Bolded parts:

 

"Allah hath purchased of the believers their persons and their goods; for theirs (in return) is the garden (of Paradise): they fight in His cause, and slay and are slain: a promise binding on Him in truth, through the Law, the Gospel, and the Quran: and who is more faithful to his covenant than Allah? then rejoice in the bargain which ye have concluded: that is the achievement supreme." (Quran 9:111)

 

@ OP:

Therefore listen not to the Unbelievers, but strive against them with the utmost strenuousness..."   (Quran 25:52)

 

@ 2. Bolded parts:

I think youre reffering to the crusades, right?

The crusades took place ~ 350 years against the first christian countries were conquered by the muslims, they are a reaction against the discriminated and killed christians in the holy land and muslims who wanted to conqure the byzantine empire.


I'm not going to waste my time AGAIN going back and forth over your cherry picked verses that are ignorant of the context from the verses just above and below as well as historical revalence in which it was recorded. You won't agree with the actual context anyways.

As for the last paragraph, I was talking the whole Dark Ages, not just the Crusades which you obviously don't know the history of either. They were anything but a purely retaliatory action. Additionally, the Dome of the Rock being built almost 400 years before the first crusade disproves that they were a retaliatory action against the rise of Islamic empire. Really, it took 400 years for Europe to fight back?



jfonty said:

The real funny thing about this thread is that some people are burning poppies as a protest against what?

Western or European aggression the world over.

People are being killed in Afghanistan for no reason other than conquest, only the fools still hold on to Bin Laden (who?) and 911.

People are being killed in Iraq for no reason other than conquest, only the fools hang on to WMD's.

People are being killed in Somalia because they're trying to protect their waters from having nuclear waste illegally dumped  by the west/Europe, they are called pirates.

And some people protesting whilst burning a poppy is a travesty?

You Can't Be Serious!!!!!

Big difference here.

The wars fought by america arent religious ones nor are they doing what is written in the bible, but muslims do it because of their religion and they do exactly what is written in the quran.

People are also getting killed in iraq just because they are christian who lived there before the arabs came and took everything, just like the persers, copts in egypt, whole north africa and so on.

Believe me, IF countries like iran or afghanistan were as powerful as the USA we had been already been killed or forced to convert to islam.



Fedor Emelianenko - Greatest Fighter and most humble man to ever walk the earth:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lVVrNOQtlzY

hiroko said:

muslims should go aways  there own countries..
they hate us soo much... but they stil come here.

hypocrits


Can't agree more, they hate living in the UK and hate everyone in it, yet they don't want to fuck off back to their countries, they're like your everyday whiny teenager that hates everyone but is pathetically useless and doesn't want to grow up, arabs are such huge hypocrits that it makes me ashamed...

edit : but i think i'm going offtopic here, immigrants are immigrants, they're always annoying.



I live for the burn...and the sting of pleasure...
I live for the sword, the steel, and the gun...

- Wasteland - The Mission.

superchunk said:
ProdigyBam said:
superchunk said:
 

That's part of the problem.

Too often we have these highly vocal people within Islam and like the OP outside of Islam very happily pushing the idea that Islam teaches violence commanded as an action towards nonMuslims and that actions like these are the only true response.

Combine that with who's actually in control in Muslim lands and what will happen to those who would speak out against these actions and you have a self-fullfilling cycle of hatred and ignorance.

Thankfully I live in the US and as Muslim I can come out and say how wrong these actions are OR how wrong suicide bombing is and that they will go to hell for their actions. This can all happen without fear of being targeted by those who simply want exteamist views to thrive and remain in power.

What you ask for simply can't happen today. Just like it took the deaths of many during the Dark Ages who spoke out against Christianities ignorance and killings, it will take the same now for Islam. Unfortunately, people like the OP are too wrapped up in their ignorance to see the similarities and acknowldege that its better to try to teach full/real version of the Qur'an instead of cherry picking the 10% that when looked out out of context provides support for violent and evil behaviour.

I've considered many times writing a book on Islam's history and full look into the Prophet and the Qur'an. Yet I haven't as I'm afraid some idiot in the Middle East would ignorantly proclaim I'm a heretic and want my head. When in reality he is the one bastardizing the word of God.

@ Bolded parts:

 

"Allah hath purchased of the believers their persons and their goods; for theirs (in return) is the garden (of Paradise): they fight in His cause, and slay and are slain: a promise binding on Him in truth, through the Law, the Gospel, and the Quran: and who is more faithful to his covenant than Allah? then rejoice in the bargain which ye have concluded: that is the achievement supreme." (Quran 9:111)

 

@ OP:

Therefore listen not to the Unbelievers, but strive against them with the utmost strenuousness..."   (Quran 25:52)

 

@ 2. Bolded parts:

I think youre reffering to the crusades, right?

The crusades took place ~ 350 years against the first christian countries were conquered by the muslims, they are a reaction against the discriminated and killed christians in the holy land and muslims who wanted to conqure the byzantine empire.


I'm not going to waste my time AGAIN going back and forth over your cherry picked verses that are ignorant of the context from the verses just above and below as well as historical revalence in which it was recorded. You won't agree with the actual context anyways.

As for the last paragraph, I was talking the whole Dark Ages, not just the Crusades which you obviously don't know the history of either. They were anything but a purely retaliatory action. Additionally, the Dome of the Rock being built almost 400 years before the first crusade disproves that they were a retaliatory action against the rise of Islamic empire. Really, it took 400 years for Europe to fight back?


No but byzantine asked the pope for help because the muslims were about to conquer the byzantine empire also and that was enough for the christians in europe so they had to start the crusades.

Ahh, so the actual context of the verses is peace, right.

"kill them, kill the, kill them but in context !!!!111 it means peace" funny how muslims love this word "context"

Or "self defence" yeah, the arabs conquered 60% of the christian world because of "self defence" riiiiight, they attacked persia, north africa, egypt and so on for no reason, only because it was written in the quran.

you know that im right and it pisses you on, youre just hoping that you can fool the other ones here with your "context" and "self defence" taqqya even if its the complete oppostie of the actual facts.

fortunately your muslim brothers and sisters arent as intelligent as you and show what really is on their mind, i mean, i would just wait till the muslims are in the mayority and then start with the shit, but thank god theyre as stupid as they are.



Fedor Emelianenko - Greatest Fighter and most humble man to ever walk the earth:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lVVrNOQtlzY

ProdigyBam said:
superchunk said:
ProdigyBam said:
superchunk said:
 

That's part of the problem.

Too often we have these highly vocal people within Islam and like the OP outside of Islam very happily pushing the idea that Islam teaches violence commanded as an action towards nonMuslims and that actions like these are the only true response.

Combine that with who's actually in control in Muslim lands and what will happen to those who would speak out against these actions and you have a self-fullfilling cycle of hatred and ignorance.

Thankfully I live in the US and as Muslim I can come out and say how wrong these actions are OR how wrong suicide bombing is and that they will go to hell for their actions. This can all happen without fear of being targeted by those who simply want exteamist views to thrive and remain in power.

What you ask for simply can't happen today. Just like it took the deaths of many during the Dark Ages who spoke out against Christianities ignorance and killings, it will take the same now for Islam. Unfortunately, people like the OP are too wrapped up in their ignorance to see the similarities and acknowldege that its better to try to teach full/real version of the Qur'an instead of cherry picking the 10% that when looked out out of context provides support for violent and evil behaviour.

I've considered many times writing a book on Islam's history and full look into the Prophet and the Qur'an. Yet I haven't as I'm afraid some idiot in the Middle East would ignorantly proclaim I'm a heretic and want my head. When in reality he is the one bastardizing the word of God.

@ Bolded parts:

 

"Allah hath purchased of the believers their persons and their goods; for theirs (in return) is the garden (of Paradise): they fight in His cause, and slay and are slain: a promise binding on Him in truth, through the Law, the Gospel, and the Quran: and who is more faithful to his covenant than Allah? then rejoice in the bargain which ye have concluded: that is the achievement supreme." (Quran 9:111)

 

@ OP:

Therefore listen not to the Unbelievers, but strive against them with the utmost strenuousness..."   (Quran 25:52)

 

@ 2. Bolded parts:

I think youre reffering to the crusades, right?

The crusades took place ~ 350 years against the first christian countries were conquered by the muslims, they are a reaction against the discriminated and killed christians in the holy land and muslims who wanted to conqure the byzantine empire.


I'm not going to waste my time AGAIN going back and forth over your cherry picked verses that are ignorant of the context from the verses just above and below as well as historical revalence in which it was recorded. You won't agree with the actual context anyways.

As for the last paragraph, I was talking the whole Dark Ages, not just the Crusades which you obviously don't know the history of either. They were anything but a purely retaliatory action. Additionally, the Dome of the Rock being built almost 400 years before the first crusade disproves that they were a retaliatory action against the rise of Islamic empire. Really, it took 400 years for Europe to fight back?


No but byzantine asked the pope for help because the muslims were about to conquer the byzantine empire also and that was enough for the christians in europe so they had to start the crusades.

Ahh, so the actual context of the verses is peace, right.

"kill them, kill the, kill them but in context !!!!111 it means peace" funny how muslims love this word "context"

Or "self defence" yeah, the arabs conquered 60% of the christian world because of "self defence" riiiiight, they attacked persia, north africa, egypt and so on for no reason, only because it was written in the quran.

you know that im right and it pisses you on, youre just hoping that you can fool the other ones here with your "context" and "self defence" taqqya even if its the complete oppostie of the actual facts.

fortunately your muslim brothers and sisters arent as intelligent as you and show what really is on their mind, i mean, i would just wait till the muslims are in the mayority and then start with the shit, but thank god theyre as stupid as they are.

u can't be serious right?