By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - PC Discussion - Retailers threaten to ban Steam games!

Scoobes said:
Antabus said:

Yeah. Steam is DRM and a bad one. I don't want to support DRM. Why do you want to support DRM? Is there some reason for that? Why you should not be able to sell a digital download?

I'll support it as long as the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. To me, having saved game backups, the ability to play anywhere without having to take my disks, not having to worry about finding disks when I get new hardware and the new cross platform ownership if I decide to buy a Mac, outweigh the disadvantage of second hand sale. That's not including all the extra community features.

Essentially, it's DRM which whilst in one hand takes away one ability, but gives a lot of benefits to the customer with the other. In other words, it's the only DRM I've seen that's actually doing something right.

On the second hand sale of DD products you have to remember that the laws were originally written for physical products that undergo degradation with use. With digital download the area is very grey. With a digital download there is not degradation, hence if you sell a DD product onto another party, they will essentially receive exactly the same product as one from brand new/full price.

For physical media, the equivalent would be if you purchased a DVD, made a perfect replica, then sold it on. It bascially equates to a form of piracy. These are really some pretty insane issues for law makers to sort out, because on one hand you have the right to sell, but on the other, they have to protect the content holders/distributors.


I don't get it. Would it be bad if you could sell the games you bought on steam or that you would not have to put up with steam or any other drm crap if you buy a retail game? I guess you like the EA online passes too. Oh wait, that is not a valve thing...

So let me get this straight...

If you would sell a game which you have bought from steam to another steam user... that would be like making a pirate copy of the game? Even though you would lose the game from your steam games.

I think I am starting to see the reason for your drm supporting.



Around the Network
Antabus said:
vlad321 said:

Now I maybe see them once a week and a half, with 5 to scroll through, 4 of which are old.

Furthermore, Steam itself doesnt eat resources if you have it running in the background, so I don't see your laptop argument at all.

P.S. At least pick a manly game that requires skills from back in the day like Quake or UT, don't be a countard and discredit yourself by saying HL2 sucks.

You will see those when you log on steam, if there are new ones.

My argument? I just don't want to install steam on my laptop. Why should I install it there? That is if steam would not force you to install even if you buy a game from a retail store.

HL and HL2 are propably the worst shooters I have ever played. They are just so boring.

May I quote your post scriptum on my sig? I just love that manly part.


That is simply not true, because I never see them when I log on from a restart. As I stated above, I only see them when I exit from a game I launched from steam, and even that doesn't always work. As I said, I have been pissed at deals I have missed before.

As for the laptop, it doesn't cost you anything. Steam is lightweight, though the new version not so much as before but it's still a minimal amount, far less than my browsers take (especially Chrome in terms of RAM eaten up), and uses less CPU than most of the core services you are running on windows.

Go ahead.

P.S. If you want to make money back from games why don't you just go ahead and pirate them? The developer doesn't see any money from the sale/copy anyhow.



Tag(thx fkusumot) - "Yet again I completely fail to see your point..."

HD vs Wii, PC vs HD: http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=93374

Why Regenerating Health is a crap game mechanic: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3986420

gamrReview's broken review scores: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4170835

 

vlad321 said:
Antabus said:
vlad321 said:

Now I maybe see them once a week and a half, with 5 to scroll through, 4 of which are old.

Furthermore, Steam itself doesnt eat resources if you have it running in the background, so I don't see your laptop argument at all.

P.S. At least pick a manly game that requires skills from back in the day like Quake or UT, don't be a countard and discredit yourself by saying HL2 sucks.

You will see those when you log on steam, if there are new ones.

My argument? I just don't want to install steam on my laptop. Why should I install it there? That is if steam would not force you to install even if you buy a game from a retail store.

HL and HL2 are propably the worst shooters I have ever played. They are just so boring.

May I quote your post scriptum on my sig? I just love that manly part.


That is simply not true, because I never see them when I log on from a restart. As I stated above, I only see them when I exit from a game I launched from steam, and even that doesn't always work. As I said, I have been pissed at deals I have missed before.

As for the laptop, it doesn't cost you anything. Steam is lightweight, though the new version not so much as before but it's still a minimal amount, far less than my browsers take (especially Chrome in terms of RAM eaten up), and uses less CPU than most of the core services you are running on windows.

Go ahead.

P.S. If you want to make money back from games why don't you just go ahead and pirate them? The developer doesn't see any money from the sale/copy anyhow.


That is true. You propably don't see it that much if you keep steam running all the time. I start steam only when I want to play a steam game and then there will be many of those messages. "Preorder now" "10% off" and so on.

It doesn't cost me anything, true. What do I gain from it? Nothing. I just don't want it.

Because pirating is illegal and the developer has seen the money from my purchase. I guess I should not sell my car when I am going to get a new one then. Because the manufacturer does not see money for the car... Your logic is simply astonishing.

And honestly, why on earth I should give a rats ass about the developers as a customer?



Antabus said:
vlad321 said:
Antabus said:
vlad321 said:

Now I maybe see them once a week and a half, with 5 to scroll through, 4 of which are old.

Furthermore, Steam itself doesnt eat resources if you have it running in the background, so I don't see your laptop argument at all.

P.S. At least pick a manly game that requires skills from back in the day like Quake or UT, don't be a countard and discredit yourself by saying HL2 sucks.

You will see those when you log on steam, if there are new ones.

My argument? I just don't want to install steam on my laptop. Why should I install it there? That is if steam would not force you to install even if you buy a game from a retail store.

HL and HL2 are propably the worst shooters I have ever played. They are just so boring.

May I quote your post scriptum on my sig? I just love that manly part.


That is simply not true, because I never see them when I log on from a restart. As I stated above, I only see them when I exit from a game I launched from steam, and even that doesn't always work. As I said, I have been pissed at deals I have missed before.

As for the laptop, it doesn't cost you anything. Steam is lightweight, though the new version not so much as before but it's still a minimal amount, far less than my browsers take (especially Chrome in terms of RAM eaten up), and uses less CPU than most of the core services you are running on windows.

Go ahead.

P.S. If you want to make money back from games why don't you just go ahead and pirate them? The developer doesn't see any money from the sale/copy anyhow.


That is true. You propably don't see it that much if you keep steam running all the time. I start steam only when I want to play a steam game and then there will be many of those messages. "Preorder now" "10% off" and so on.

It doesn't cost me anything, true. What do I gain from it? Nothing. I just don't want it.

Because pirating is illegal and the developer has seen the money from my purchase. I guess I should not sell my car when I am going to get a new one then. Because the manufacturer does not see money for the car... Your logic is simply astonishing.


You gain having your games being consistently up to date.

A car is a physical object whose value is itself. When you relinquish your car you lose that value. A game is an idea, and its value is the ability to experience it. You don't suddenly lose the experience of the game when you sell it. Not only do you give someone else the value of the idea, but you make money off of it. It's in fact worse than piracy. You made money off the developer's idea, and in the same swift stroke prevented them from getting any money. Your ability, or lack thereof, to understand this is astounding.



Tag(thx fkusumot) - "Yet again I completely fail to see your point..."

HD vs Wii, PC vs HD: http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=93374

Why Regenerating Health is a crap game mechanic: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3986420

gamrReview's broken review scores: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4170835

 

vlad321 said:
Antabus said:
vlad321 said:
Antabus said:
vlad321 said:

Now I maybe see them once a week and a half, with 5 to scroll through, 4 of which are old.

Furthermore, Steam itself doesnt eat resources if you have it running in the background, so I don't see your laptop argument at all.

P.S. At least pick a manly game that requires skills from back in the day like Quake or UT, don't be a countard and discredit yourself by saying HL2 sucks.

You will see those when you log on steam, if there are new ones.

My argument? I just don't want to install steam on my laptop. Why should I install it there? That is if steam would not force you to install even if you buy a game from a retail store.

HL and HL2 are propably the worst shooters I have ever played. They are just so boring.

May I quote your post scriptum on my sig? I just love that manly part.


That is simply not true, because I never see them when I log on from a restart. As I stated above, I only see them when I exit from a game I launched from steam, and even that doesn't always work. As I said, I have been pissed at deals I have missed before.

As for the laptop, it doesn't cost you anything. Steam is lightweight, though the new version not so much as before but it's still a minimal amount, far less than my browsers take (especially Chrome in terms of RAM eaten up), and uses less CPU than most of the core services you are running on windows.

Go ahead.

P.S. If you want to make money back from games why don't you just go ahead and pirate them? The developer doesn't see any money from the sale/copy anyhow.


That is true. You propably don't see it that much if you keep steam running all the time. I start steam only when I want to play a steam game and then there will be many of those messages. "Preorder now" "10% off" and so on.

It doesn't cost me anything, true. What do I gain from it? Nothing. I just don't want it.

Because pirating is illegal and the developer has seen the money from my purchase. I guess I should not sell my car when I am going to get a new one then. Because the manufacturer does not see money for the car... Your logic is simply astonishing.


You gain having your games being consistently up to date.

A car is a physical object whose value is itself. When you relinquish your car you lose that value. A game is an idea, and its value is the ability to experience it. You don't suddenly lose the experience of the game when you sell it. Not only do you give someone else the value of the idea, but you make money off of it. It's in fact worse than piracy. You made money off the developer's idea, and in the same swift stroke prevented them from getting any money. Your ability, or lack thereof, to understand this is astounding.

A game which you buy from retail is a physical object.

But even if you buy something from DD service, you should own it and be able to do whatever you want with it. I don't lose the experience which I've had with the car... or do I? ;) Oh and hey, car is also an idea. Someone has spent a lot of hours designing and manufacturing it, just like a game. Goddamn, those people who sell their used cars are worse than car thiefs because they make money of the idea. Damn!!



Around the Network
Antabus said:
Scoobes said:

I'll support it as long as the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. To me, having saved game backups, the ability to play anywhere without having to take my disks, not having to worry about finding disks when I get new hardware and the new cross platform ownership if I decide to buy a Mac, outweigh the disadvantage of second hand sale. That's not including all the extra community features.

Essentially, it's DRM which whilst in one hand takes away one ability, but gives a lot of benefits to the customer with the other. In other words, it's the only DRM I've seen that's actually doing something right.

On the second hand sale of DD products you have to remember that the laws were originally written for physical products that undergo degradation with use. With digital download the area is very grey. With a digital download there is not degradation, hence if you sell a DD product onto another party, they will essentially receive exactly the same product as one from brand new/full price.

For physical media, the equivalent would be if you purchased a DVD, made a perfect replica, then sold it on. It bascially equates to a form of piracy. These are really some pretty insane issues for law makers to sort out, because on one hand you have the right to sell, but on the other, they have to protect the content holders/distributors.


I don't get it. Would it be bad if you could sell the games you bought on steam or that you would not have to put up with steam or any other drm crap if you buy a retail game? I guess you like the EA online passes too. Oh wait, that is not a valve thing...

So let me get this straight...

If you would sell a game which you have bought from steam to another steam user... that would be like making a pirate copy of the game? Even though you would lose the game from your steam games.

I think I am starting to see the reason for your drm supporting.

I never said it was logical, lol.

It's an issue with the laws for protecting copyright holders. Basically, the reason you're allowed to sell your content is because the value decreases with use (like a car for instance). With digital download, as their is no decrease in value due to the user; it remains identical from the day you purchased it. Due to this, a digital resale becomes an issue for content holders as their is no distinct advantage to buying something new, the quality of the digital product remains constant and therefore, for the content provider, is the equivalent of piracy. 

Even selling second hand games has the disadvantage that the disk is worn, the case may be damaged, manual missing, etc.

You can however, sell an entire account because when you buy a game across Steam, that is technically what you own... yeah, the laws are fuzzy.

Anyway, I never said I supported DRM as a whole. I said I support a service (that has DRM) when there are much greater advantages to the end user that outweigh the negatives. The only service that has done this (in games) is Steam. The positives of Steam as a service include physical damge of disks becomes a non-issue, auto-patching, cross-platform play, cross-platform ownership, saved game backups, community features (acheivements, chat, profiles etc.) and being playable on multiple hardware units no matter where you are. If I have to stay with family for a few months and have to use a seperate PC, I don't need to take my games with me, just my account details.

Which other services (with DRM) offer all of this? As far as I'm aware, none of them (including the EA online thing). Valve and Steam have fans because the service is good. It wasn't all plain sailing as I'm sure you know. When Steam was first launched it was a terrible service, but people don't mind anymore because it's greatly improved over the years. You must see that right?



vlad321 said:

You gain having your games being consistently up to date.

A car is a physical object whose value is itself. When you relinquish your car you lose that value. A game is an idea, and its value is the ability to experience it. You don't suddenly lose the experience of the game when you sell it. Not only do you give someone else the value of the idea, but you make money off of it. It's in fact worse than piracy. You made money off the developer's idea, and in the same swift stroke prevented them from getting any money. Your ability, or lack thereof, to understand this is astounding.

Ok, this is sorta dumb.

A car gives me an ability to experience it's value as I enjoy my trip through the mountains. I use it for no other purpose (many rich people do this). Selling the car I don't suddenly lose the experience of the ride when I sell it. Not only do I give someone else the value of the experience, but I make money off of it. I made money off of the manufacturers idea (enjoyable sports car) and in the same swift stroke prevented them from getting any money.

Anyone who sells anything they did not make with their own hands is preventing the original creators from making money. Just remember to stop buying products from retailers (or any middle man), and stop using dumb analogies to justify piracy or argue that they must support piracy if they support selling the rights to something they bought.




If you drop a PS3 right on top of a Wii, it would definitely defeat it. Not so sure about the Xbox360. - mancandy
In the past we played games. In the future we watch games. - Forest-Spirit
11/03/09 Desposit: Mod Bribery (RolStoppable)  vg$ 500.00
06/03/09 Purchase: Moderator Privilege  vg$ -50,000.00

Nordlead Jr. Photo/Video Gallery!!! (Video Added 4/19/10)

vlad321 said:
blunty51 said:

MS has a monopoly with XBL, Sony has one with PSN.

Are there any consequences of that? I haven't been privy to any.


Yes, you actually have to pay to play online. Considering LIVE is inferior to regular online and you have to pay for it's a sign of lack of competition.

But you don't hear publishers making a fuss about XBL, like they do in this case.

The point is that there is no sub-competition on the 360 itself, same with the PS3. The only competition where that is concerned is XBL vs. PSN vs. WW vs. PC DD (and this is what should keep any individual entity from getting out of hand). Yet there seems to be a problem for the lack of sub-competition on the PC alone.

Why should it be mandatory for PC to be any different than the other platforms? It shouldn't. It's only because it's an open platform and everyone wants piece of the pie. I don't think there's any other reason, but that's just my take on it anyway.



Scoobes said:

I never said it was logical, lol.

It's an issue with the laws for protecting copyright holders. Basically, the reason you're allowed to sell your content is because the value decreases with use (like a car for instance). With digital download, as their is no decrease in value due to the user; it remains identical from the day you purchased it. Due to this, a digital resale becomes an issue for content holders as their is no distinct advantage to buying something new, the quality of the digital product remains constant and therefore, for the content provider, is the equivalent of piracy. 

Even selling second hand games has the disadvantage that the disk is worn, the case may be damaged, manual missing, etc.

You can however, sell an entire account because when you buy a game across Steam, that is technically what you own... yeah, the laws are fuzzy.

Anyway, I never said I supported DRM as a whole. I said I support a service (that has DRM) when there are much greater advantages to the end user that outweigh the negatives. The only service that has done this (in games) is Steam. The positives of Steam as a service include physical damge of disks becomes a non-issue, auto-patching, cross-platform play, cross-platform ownership, saved game backups, community features (acheivements, chat, profiles etc.) and being playable on multiple hardware units no matter where you are. If I have to stay with family for a few months and have to use a seperate PC, I don't need to take my games with me, just my account details.

Which other services (with DRM) offer all of this? As far as I'm aware, none of them (including the EA online thing). Valve and Steam have fans because the service is good. It wasn't all plain sailing as I'm sure you know. When Steam was first launched it was a terrible service, but people don't mind anymore because it's greatly improved over the years. You must see that right?

the bold is so totally not true and a lie that content creators feed to consumers to try and convince them that resale is as bad as piracy . The reason you are allowed to sell your property is because it is yours. Plain and simple. These publishers are trying to restrict what you are buying from a copy of the game to a liscense to use the game. This is what they are doing.




If you drop a PS3 right on top of a Wii, it would definitely defeat it. Not so sure about the Xbox360. - mancandy
In the past we played games. In the future we watch games. - Forest-Spirit
11/03/09 Desposit: Mod Bribery (RolStoppable)  vg$ 500.00
06/03/09 Purchase: Moderator Privilege  vg$ -50,000.00

Nordlead Jr. Photo/Video Gallery!!! (Video Added 4/19/10)

Scoobes said:

I never said it was logical, lol.

It's an issue with the laws for protecting copyright holders. Basically, the reason you're allowed to sell your content is because the value decreases with use (like a car for instance). With digital download, as their is no decrease in value due to the user; it remains identical from the day you purchased it. Due to this, a digital resale becomes an issue for content holders as their is no distinct advantage to buying something new, the quality of the digital product remains constant and therefore, for the content provider, is the equivalent of piracy. 

Even selling second hand games has the disadvantage that the disk is worn, the case may be damaged, manual missing, etc.

You can however, sell an entire account because when you buy a game across Steam, that is technically what you own... yeah, the laws are fuzzy.

 

Which other services (with DRM) offer all of this? As far as I'm aware, none of them (including the EA online thing). Valve and Steam have fans because the service is good. It wasn't all plain sailing as I'm sure you know. When Steam was first launched it was a terrible service, but people don't mind anymore because it's greatly improved over the years. You must see that right?


I don't know about the laws where you might live, but there is no such law here. I really doubt that there is that kind of law there either. How about those retail games which value goes up from the purchase? Like when you get a game for 5€, you should not be able to sell it for 10€? Or those old collectors games? But once again, I don't care about the developer. I care about the customer, me. My rights.

Actually, steam does not allow you to sell the account. It is forbidden in some rule and they might ban the account if you do that.

I don't know, I prefer to buy my games from retail. I do know that and I am still pissed at valve for making people use steam back then. It was horrible and true, it is better now. But as you can see, some people mind. At least me. :P