D-FENS said: My only problem with this site's numbers are the adjustments. When the numbers are off a little, OK, but when they're off a lot and the only way to correct them is after the big three release their numbers, or by running with NPD's numbers, it makes this site look like a Mickey Mouse operation that is easily dismissed by other communities. Case in point: the huge PS3 adjustment in others for the past several weeks. I remember looking at the others numbers at the start of the week whenb PS3 was at 90k-ish, at the end of the week, that had skyrocketed to, what 155k? With the new adjustments, the weekly others looks nothing at all like it was being portrayed on this site previously, hence, it's really easy to point at VGZ's numbers, laugh, and call them a joke. |
Thing is, isn't it more important thatthe numbers are right?
When new data comes in that causes these adjustments, it only helps in making future numbers closer to the truth in the long run. Besides, don't act like seeing high PS3 sales didn't make you happy lol
Leatherhat on July 6th, 2012 3pm. Vita sales:"3 mil for COD 2 mil for AC. Maybe more. " thehusbo on July 6th, 2012 5pm. Vita sales:"5 mil for COD 2.2 mil for AC."