By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony Discussion - 12 minutes of Killzone 3 multiplayer footage

tuscaniman said:
bRoKeN said:

open pics in new tab to see the full image
for the dude complaining kz3 will be kz2.5...... look at that. already looks different. the last pic is suppose to be the alien jungle that the devs said "unlike anything you seen before"


Nice posting of concept art. The jungle is so dark you can't even tell what it is. As I said when I see actual gameplay of something different then maybe my mind will change. Until then its Killzone 2.5. If I remember right alot of PS3 only owners bashed Halo 3 calling it Halo 2.5. Tell me how KZ3 is a bigger jump from KZ2 than what Halo 3 was from Halo 2....its not. Don't dish it out if you can't take it.

Yet you still bought halo3 and now your calling KZ3 a KZ2.5 and wont be buying it?



Around the Network
pizzahut451 said:
Hynad said:

Errrr...  The Helghasts are former human colonists.    They are not an Alien race. ¬_¬


they certnaly are. look at their ears. They are very sharp. and how come none of them doesnt have any hair at all? they are all bald.

Only thing that comes to my mind is that the life on Helghan changed them somehow. Or maybe they are more advanced type of humans. But than again, they get their ass kicked by ISA all the time


Hum, no.  A quick look at scholar Visari's speech at the very beginning of Killzone 2 will show you their ears are normal ears.

As for the hair, this is due to the Helghan planet's Atmosphere being highly radioactive. ^_-

 

Do you even know the setting and story of the series?



Hynad said:
pizzahut451 said:
Hynad said:

Errrr...  The Helghasts are former human colonists.    They are not an Alien race. ¬_¬


they certnaly are. look at their ears. They are very sharp. and how come none of them doesnt have any hair at all? they are all bald.

Only thing that comes to my mind is that the life on Helghan changed them somehow. Or maybe they are more advanced type of humans. But than again, they get their ass kicked by ISA all the time


Hum, no.  A quick look at scholar Visari's speech at the very beginning of Killzone 2 will show you their ears are normal ears.

As for the hair, this is due to the Helghan planet's Atmosphere being highly radioactive. ^_-

 

Do you even know the setting and story of the series?


hmm, i could have sworn i saw the sharp ears in the game somwhere. i"ll check again sometimes later



wow, after seeing that artwork, i'm more hyped than ever lol



CPU: Ryzen 7950X
GPU: MSI 4090 SUPRIM X 24G
Motherboard: MSI MEG X670E GODLIKE
RAM: CORSAIR DOMINATOR PLATINUM 32GB DDR5
SSD: Kingston FURY Renegade 4TB
Gaming Console: PLAYSTATION 5
Ping_ii said:
tuscaniman said:
bRoKeN said:

open pics in new tab to see the full image
for the dude complaining kz3 will be kz2.5...... look at that. already looks different. the last pic is suppose to be the alien jungle that the devs said "unlike anything you seen before"


Nice posting of concept art. The jungle is so dark you can't even tell what it is. As I said when I see actual gameplay of something different then maybe my mind will change. Until then its Killzone 2.5. If I remember right alot of PS3 only owners bashed Halo 3 calling it Halo 2.5. Tell me how KZ3 is a bigger jump from KZ2 than what Halo 3 was from Halo 2....its not. Don't dish it out if you can't take it.

Yet you still bought halo3 and now your calling KZ3 a KZ2.5 and wont be buying it?


Yes because Halo 3 released in 2007. A year where shooters weren't as prevelant and Halo is a better series than Killzone in my opinion. Killzone 3 is competing against Halo:Reach, Black Ops, Crysis 2, Gears of War 3, Bulletstorm etc. I'm not going to buy every single shooter so the ones that appeal the most to me are the ones that bring something new to the table. Killzone 3 so far isn't much different than KZ2 except a few add ons and some better visuals. We'll see if I'm proved wrong. I'm definitely buying Reach, Gears 3, and Black Ops. After that its between Crysis 2, Bulletstorm, or Killzone 3. In between all this I'm picking up Mortal Kombat. Too many games, need to save up for Las Vegas, and Killzone 3 needs to impress. I apologize for calling it KZ 2.5.



Around the Network
tuscaniman said:
Ping_ii said:
tuscaniman said:
bRoKeN said:

open pics in new tab to see the full image
for the dude complaining kz3 will be kz2.5...... look at that. already looks different. the last pic is suppose to be the alien jungle that the devs said "unlike anything you seen before"


Nice posting of concept art. The jungle is so dark you can't even tell what it is. As I said when I see actual gameplay of something different then maybe my mind will change. Until then its Killzone 2.5. If I remember right alot of PS3 only owners bashed Halo 3 calling it Halo 2.5. Tell me how KZ3 is a bigger jump from KZ2 than what Halo 3 was from Halo 2....its not. Don't dish it out if you can't take it.

Yet you still bought halo3 and now your calling KZ3 a KZ2.5 and wont be buying it?


Yes because Halo 3 released in 2007. A year where shooters weren't as prevelant and Halo is a better series than Killzone in my opinion. Killzone 3 is competing against Halo:Reach, Black Ops, Crysis 2, Gears of War 3, Bulletstorm etc. I'm not going to buy every single shooter so the ones that appeal the most to me are the ones that bring something new to the table. Killzone 3 so far isn't much different than KZ2 except a few add ons and some better visuals. We'll see if I'm proved wrong. I'm definitely buying Reach, Gears 3, and Black Ops. After that its between Crysis 2, Bulletstorm, or Killzone 3. In between all this I'm picking up Mortal Kombat. Too many games, need to save up for Las Vegas, and Killzone 3 needs to impress. I apologize for calling it KZ 2.5.


Wait... you're assuming and complaining that Killzone 3 doesn't seem to be much different than KZ2, that the shooters that appeal to you the most are the ones that bring something new to the table and then you make mention of Gears 3 ??

Sorry.  No compute.



Hynad said:
tuscaniman said:
Ping_ii said:
tuscaniman said:
bRoKeN said:

open pics in new tab to see the full image
for the dude complaining kz3 will be kz2.5...... look at that. already looks different. the last pic is suppose to be the alien jungle that the devs said "unlike anything you seen before"


Nice posting of concept art. The jungle is so dark you can't even tell what it is. As I said when I see actual gameplay of something different then maybe my mind will change. Until then its Killzone 2.5. If I remember right alot of PS3 only owners bashed Halo 3 calling it Halo 2.5. Tell me how KZ3 is a bigger jump from KZ2 than what Halo 3 was from Halo 2....its not. Don't dish it out if you can't take it.

Yet you still bought halo3 and now your calling KZ3 a KZ2.5 and wont be buying it?


Yes because Halo 3 released in 2007. A year where shooters weren't as prevelant and Halo is a better series than Killzone in my opinion. Killzone 3 is competing against Halo:Reach, Black Ops, Crysis 2, Gears of War 3, Bulletstorm etc. I'm not going to buy every single shooter so the ones that appeal the most to me are the ones that bring something new to the table. Killzone 3 so far isn't much different than KZ2 except a few add ons and some better visuals. We'll see if I'm proved wrong. I'm definitely buying Reach, Gears 3, and Black Ops. After that its between Crysis 2, Bulletstorm, or Killzone 3. In between all this I'm picking up Mortal Kombat. Too many games, need to save up for Las Vegas, and Killzone 3 needs to impress. I apologize for calling it KZ 2.5.


Wait... you're assuming and complaining that Killzone 3 doesn't seem to be much different than KZ2, that the shooters that appeal to you the most are the ones that bring something new to the table and then you make mention of Gears 3 ??

Sorry.  No compute.

Sigh I guess I'll mention that I like Gears of War much better than Killzone as well. Secondly have you heard of a thing called Beast Mode? That is worth purchasing Gears of War 3 in itself. Not to mention its going to have competitive matchmaking, 4 player co-op, Horde mode is back, updated graphics, new weapons, mechs are in like KZ3. KZ3 may  have as much content as Gears (if and when more info is announced), but I like the Gears series way better. Thats why its a must buy. Killzone is just not on the elite level of shooters as Gears and Halo.



tuscaniman said:
Ping_ii said:
tuscaniman said:
bRoKeN said:

open pics in new tab to see the full image
for the dude complaining kz3 will be kz2.5...... look at that. already looks different. the last pic is suppose to be the alien jungle that the devs said "unlike anything you seen before"


Nice posting of concept art. The jungle is so dark you can't even tell what it is. As I said when I see actual gameplay of something different then maybe my mind will change. Until then its Killzone 2.5. If I remember right alot of PS3 only owners bashed Halo 3 calling it Halo 2.5. Tell me how KZ3 is a bigger jump from KZ2 than what Halo 3 was from Halo 2....its not. Don't dish it out if you can't take it.

Yet you still bought halo3 and now your calling KZ3 a KZ2.5 and wont be buying it?


Yes because Halo 3 released in 2007. A year where shooters weren't as prevelant and Halo is a better series than Killzone in my opinion. Killzone 3 is competing against Halo:Reach, Black Ops, Crysis 2, Gears of War 3, Bulletstorm etc. I'm not going to buy every single shooter so the ones that appeal the most to me are the ones that bring something new to the table. Killzone 3 so far isn't much different than KZ2 except a few add ons and some better visuals. We'll see if I'm proved wrong. I'm definitely buying Reach, Gears 3, and Black Ops. After that its between Crysis 2, Bulletstorm, or Killzone 3. In between all this I'm picking up Mortal Kombat. Too many games, need to save up for Las Vegas, and Killzone 3 needs to impress. I apologize for calling it KZ 2.5.

So you're buying black ops even though its cod 5.5???
as soon as you said your buying cod and not killzone, IMO your legitimacy went out the door.



Smart Men answer questions, Wise men ask questions.
Gamers play games, True Gamers support Gaming

tuscaniman said:
Hynad said:
tuscaniman said:
Ping_ii said:
tuscaniman said:
bRoKeN said:


Yes because Halo 3 released in 2007. A year where shooters weren't as prevelant and Halo is a better series than Killzone in my opinion. Killzone 3 is competing against Halo:Reach, Black Ops, Crysis 2, Gears of War 3, Bulletstorm etc. I'm not going to buy every single shooter so the ones that appeal the most to me are the ones that bring something new to the table. Killzone 3 so far isn't much different than KZ2 except a few add ons and some better visuals. We'll see if I'm proved wrong. I'm definitely buying Reach, Gears 3, and Black Ops. After that its between Crysis 2, Bulletstorm, or Killzone 3. In between all this I'm picking up Mortal Kombat. Too many games, need to save up for Las Vegas, and Killzone 3 needs to impress. I apologize for calling it KZ 2.5.


Wait... you're assuming and complaining that Killzone 3 doesn't seem to be much different than KZ2, that the shooters that appeal to you the most are the ones that bring something new to the table and then you make mention of Gears 3 ??

Sorry.  No compute.

Sigh I guess I'll mention that I like Gears of War much better than Killzone as well. Secondly have you heard of a thing called Beast Mode? That is worth purchasing Gears of War 3 in itself. Not to mention its going to have competitive matchmaking, 4 player co-op, Horde mode is back, updated graphics, new weapons, mechs are in like KZ3. KZ3 may  have as much content as Gears (if and when more info is announced), but I like the Gears series way better. Thats why its a must buy. Killzone is just not on the elite level of shooters as Gears and Halo.


This is all that ever needed to be said. Killzone simply can't win once you say that. The rest is irrelevant or unnesseccery.