goes both ways, like u dont need navigation controllers for all games if any,  dont need to buy tons of navigations either, and microsoft cost dont include forced xboxlive and family pack thats over 100$ if recall correctly or that ps3 can also play blu ray.

in sony defense they don't mean kinect, but the tradiontal 360 controller, ps3 ds3 batteries are built in can be replaced, and they dont need to recharge.

u are trying too hard to defend microsoft, when i recall they did since the ps3 launched calling it overpriced.

maybe not for u but hardware wise there is no comparsion that ps3 its better value for the mone since it not only better build, will last longer, it got few things like standard power cable, uses any USB flashdrive compatible, and HDD its standard 2.5. not forgetting obvious blu ray. no cost to use nextflix

So if Sony is low for doing this that makes MS even lower for copying this lowness? ROFL! ohh M$ alwayz makes me lulz.

Unlike the price comparison chart that Microsoft posted yesterday, the only big "problem" with this feature comparison chart is that due to being controller-less, it simply doesn't make much sense to even compare Kinect. It's like a comparison chart with nine Netbooks and one tablet PC. Take the Kinect-column out, and the comparison is actually rather fair. If they wanted to diss Kinect, they could have easily done that by comparing some other features ("precisily measures even small movements", "has no significant lag", "can be played by more than two players at once", "can be played while sitting", "can be played even in small rooms", "works with all clothes", "motion detection consumes lots of processing power", "target audience" etc.)

By the way, I wonder why Sony listed "Feedback: Yes - Audio feedback" for Kinect. In that respect, they are presenting Kinect even better than it is. The only audio feedback that Kinect has is the usual sound that comes directly from the console, and which of course every console has. So Sony should either list that as a feature of all consoles (which would be a little unfair to the Wii, because the Wiimote has real audio feedback), or remove it as a feature from Kinect.

Buttons!

This is almost as good as the MS one

both charts are bs, ms added wii fit, and they didnt take into consideration that you play 4 player on the xbox using kinect you need two tv's to xbox's and two kinects. also they didnt take into consideration that the dualshock 3 can be used as a navigation controller. at the end of the way the wii experience is the least expensive and the best for motion gaming, because it is centered around that.

haha this is a joke!

I like this one better. Not that I really need a comparison chart, 'cause I'm biased.

Holy shit... Is this for real?!

Lol at BLU RAY Powered HD, Buttons and Wireless :D

actually u can play metroid on the ps3 if u keep linux

OMG.   Is this for real?  It's so immature.  So many of those points are totally bogus, like the entire secondary controller section.   Should state it's an extra cost for Move. included for Wii and totally unnecessary for 360.   Or Kinect not supporting rechargable batteries.  Thank God it doesn't!  What a pain that would be.

Sony hang your head down in shame.  You're acting like a pre-teen punk and blatantly insulting our intelligence ... again.