It's quite simple. He'll redefine the term "fighter" so that it's a narrow, specific genre that excludes successful games he wants to exclude and create new genre boxes specifically for those games, rather than admit that it's a broad genre. That way they never have to be mentioned for comparison. The fact that the primary activity in Mario Kart is racing and the primary activity in SSBB is fighting will be ignored.

Its much more a sandwhich of several genres then a fighter

im still waiting for an actuall definition and explanation as to why it isnt a fighter other than "its not a fighter, so there...."

otherwise, your just proving Demotruk right

The final boss of Street Fighter IV said Smash Bros is a fighter.  I rest my case. <3

Here, the ACTUAL definitions:

Racers: need to be so realistic that the sun is able to reflect off the car in front of you and cause you to crash into the nearest wall with HD flames.

Fighters: need to have about 74 different moves for each character and the fighters need to bleed if they so much as cough on each other.

That's what I'm assuming he means for them.

Mario Kart is a racer becuse you race.

Smash Bros is a fighter because you fight.

/arguement.

A brawler?

LOL prologue XD

u know what GT5 is goign to sell right?

When GT5 come out, we will see if racing games didn't sell well these days...

Well if there aren't quality racing games, people won't buy them.