Obviously you aren't comprehending the analogy, or desperately trying to change the subject. The analogy wasn't about the mechanics of the process, and I think you know that. A snowflake is a complex structure, but water molecules going from a gaseous state into a solid state isn't complex. You keep proposing that a complex result must require a complex process. I have debunked that with nothing more then a snowflake. I could debunk it with hundreds of complex natural structures. Would you like me to rattle off a litany of them?
I think I have been more then gentle with you in this back and forth. I have let you slide on quite a lot. I haven't demanded citation for your claims. I haven't demanded sources. I haven't even responded in link. Don't you think its only honorable to have enough respect for me to address the point that was made. Rather then dance around the room stalling for time, or trying to intercede in another ongoing discussion. I have a lock on you, and I am not going to relent. Further more this thread doesn't look like it is going to collapse, or pinch off yet again. So yeah your pretty cornered, and yeah that is why you got snarky with me earlier.
You really have three choices here. You can concede the point. Concede you have no good argument. Leave the thread. Like I said I haven't been particularly brutal with you. I have handled you with kid gloves, and on top of that I have also been more articulate then I needed to be. I have been more then fair with you, and more then that I have been very nice to you. Bottom line I think I deserve a real response to the point. I have put out more then enough effort thus far to justify that.
Take the hint.