I understand we have some new players

You vote players not characters. Example:

Vote: hatmoza

Also, make sure the vote is bolded so it counts. Example:

Vote: No Lynch

------------------------------------

In mafia games we also use terms  like "FoS" which basically means you suspect someone of being scum. Example.

I don't like hatmoza's reasoning. It seems kind of suspicous.

FoS hatmoza

So wait, I can't just Vote: Mafia Player? What kind of game is this? You have completely ruined my perfect plan!

I'm here, I went out last night, did not think the game would start on a Saturday, and did not think there would be so much activity on the weekend...

Anyhow, I'm going to do a no lynch, I think WoW strung themselves up and will die tonight in a night action unless a doctor protects him(her?) or was a false role-claim, etc - No sense in losing 2 pro-town on the first day (assuming we did a lynch on WoW and then Mafia taking another out tonight)

Vote: No Lynch

And to people saying vote the lurkers, it's the weekend and we (or at least I) didn't know the game had started, you can check my post history and see the last post I made was before Hatmoza started the game if you like.

^^^ So you just show up to vote no lynch huh...after we talked about lynching lurkers ?

vote : no lynch

lets see how this goes.

Well, like I said, I wasn't lurking, I just wasn't on.. If anyone had pulled up my profile before I got on a couple hours ago you would have seen the last time I was online was before Hatmoza started the game..

However, Nikells was last online 4 hours ago and still hasn't posted..  so he "could" be lurking or he might not have seen the PM from Hatmoza

Lynching a lurker at this stage of the game is as bad if not worse than the "Let's lynch Vega or Akuma to see what happens!" strategy

So guys, sadly I don't believe I have time to come online until tomorrow evening, so I will

Vote: No Lynch

until then

Does anyone know how to change text color in 3.0?

Says the serial lurker. It is a bit pre-mature still though, I agree. No way to tell who will be active through the whole course of the game. I'll take someone who doesn't post day one, but then is super active till the end of the game rather than the reverse.

Nothing new here? I'm not going to vote for WoW just because he wanted to help us. Maybe he couldn't explain his tactic to us, but he sounds like a experienced player and we shouldn't loose him in the first night. As for the lurkers, I can't be active the whole time, too. Tanstalas explained it pretty good. I would have to kill myself, too.

vote: no lynch